You are here

Home » Content

MUTLAK GÜÇ YA DA SINIRSIZ SORUMLULUK: DEVLET EGEMENLİĞİ VE ULUSLARARASI TOPLUMUN KORUMA SORUMLULUĞU

ABSOLUTE POWER OR UNLIMITED RESPONSIBILITY: SOVEREIGNTY AND RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY

Journal Name:

  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2016

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Applying sovereignty in an absolute form in modern international relations has resulted in states are estranged of legitimacy. Sovereignty supposed to guarantee welfare and security of individuals has become a threat for them. Perception of self-legitimated state sovereignty has turned into an unbounded authority. Therefore resorting to force has being legitimated to protect human rights against state. For this reason, Responsibility to Protect (R2P), being a post-modern concept, has been created on the basis of historical experiments in order not to repeat mistakes to eliminate deficiencies of the past. R2P has claimed that international society has a responsibility to stop human rights violations and mass murders performed by states. This papers aims to explain evolution of state sovereignty in terms of human rights and international society undertaking to protect human rights. In the first chapter, it has been emphasized that state sovereignty is an absolute responsibility instead uncontrolled power and touched upon contents of sovereignty in the context of human rights. The second chapter focuses on responsibilities of international society in mass murder resulted from violating human rights.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Modern uluslararası ilişkilerde egemenliğin mutlakiyetçi biçimde uygulanması otoritelerin meşruiyetten uzaklaşmalarına neden olmaktadır. Bireyin refahını ve güvenliğini sağlaması beklenen egemenlik kavramı bireyi tehdit etmeye başlamıştır. Devlet egemenliğinin kendinden meşru olduğu algısı sınırsız otoriteye dönüşmüştür. Bu yüzden insan haklarını devlete karşı korumak için kuvvet kullanmayı meşrulaştırma çabaları ortaya çıkmıştır. Koruma Sorumluluğu (KrS) insan haklarını korumak için tarihsel süreç içinde deneyimlenen birikimlerden oluşmuştur. KrS geçmişin hatalarını tekrarlamamak ve eksikliklerini gidermek amacıyla modern dünyanın ihtiyaçlarına cevap vermek adına tasarlanmış post-modern bir kavramdır. KrS devlet tarafından gerçekleştirilen toplu katliamları ve insan hakları ihlallerini engellemek adına uluslararası topluma sorumluluk yüklemektedir. Bu çalışmada devlete sınırsız sorumsuzluk sağlayan mutlak egemenlik algısının insan hakları üzerinden yaşadığı dönüşüm ve insan haklarını koruma sorumluluğunu üstlenen uluslararası topluma değinilecektir. İlk bölümde devlet egemenliğinin kontrolsüz bir güç olmaktan öte mutlak bir sorumluluk getirdiğinin vurgulanmakta ve sorumluluğun muhteviyatı insan hakları bağlamında değerlendirilmektedir. İkinci bölümde insan hakları ihlallerinden kaynaklanan toplu katliamlarda uluslararası toplumun sorumlulukları ele alınmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-mutlak-guc-ya-da-sinirsiz-sorumluluk-devlet-egemenligi-uluslararasi-toplumun-koruma-sorumlulugu.pdf
  • 24
133
158
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

2005 Dünya Zirvesi Sonuç Bildirgesi (2005). http://www.who.int/hiv/universalaccess2010/worldsummit.pdf, (07.15.2012).
2005 World Summit Outcome (2005). GA Res 60/1, UN GAOR, 60th sess, 8th plen mtg, Agenda Items 46 and 120, Supp No 49, UN Doc A/RES/60/1 (24 October 2005) para 139, http://www.ifrc.org/docs/idrl/I520EN.pdf (14.4.2015).
AKBULUT, İ. (2002). “İnsan Hakları”, Yargıtay Dergisi, 2002, s. 461, http://www.yargitay.gov.tr/belgeler/site/dergi/yrgdergi/Temmuz2002/Temmu... (5.2.2015).
AMNEUS, D. (2012). “Responsibility to Protect: Emerging Rules on Humanitarian Intervention?”, Global Society, 26(2): 241-276.
ANNAN, K. (1999). “Statement on Receiving the Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Actions of the United Nations During the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda”, http://www.un.org/press/en/1999/19991216.sgsm7263.doc.html, (20.4.2015).
Adem Ali İREN - Muharrem GÜRKAYNAK - Mustafa ATATORUN
[154]
ARBOUR, L. (2008). “The Responsibility to Protect as a Duty of Care in International Law and Practice”, Review of International Studies, 34(3): 445-458.
BADESCU, C. G. (2011). Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect Security and Human Rights, Routledge, New York, 2011.
BARKIN, J. S. (1998). "The Evolution of the Constitution of Sovereignty and the Emergence of Human Rights Norms", Joumal of International Studies, 27(2): 229-252.
BELLAMY, A. (2006). “Whither the Responsibility to Protect? Humanitarian Intervention and the 2005 World Summit”, Ethics and International Affairs, 20(2): 143-169.
BELLAMY, A. (2009). Responsibility To Protect: The Global Effort To End Mass Atrocities, Polity Press.
BELLAMY, A. J. (2011). Global Politics and the Responsibility to Protect: From Words to Deeds”, Routledge, Oxon.
BMGK (2006). 1674 sayılı Karar, http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1674(2006), (11.1.2015).
BMGK (2009). 1894 sayılı Karar, 2009, http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1894(2009), (11.1.2015).
BRADLEY, C. A. ve GOLDSMITH, J. L. (1997). “Customary International Law as Federal Common Law: A Critique of the Modern Position”, Harvard Law Review, 110(4): 815-876.
CASSESE, A. (1999). “Ex iniuria ius oritur: Are We Moving Towards International Legitimisation of Forcible Humanitarian Countermeasures in the World Community?”, European Journal of International Law, 10(1): 23-30.
CASSESE, A. (2005). International Law, Oxford University Press, New York.
CATLIN, G. (1950). A History of the Political Philosopher, Allen&Unwin, London.
CHOPRA, J. ve WEISS, T. (1992). “Sovereignty is no Longer Sacrosanct”, Ethics and International Affairs, 6(1): 95-117.
COOPER, R. ve KOHLER, J. (2009). Responsibility to Protect The Global Moral Compact for the 21st Century, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
CROSSETTE, B. “Sinking the Responsibility to Protect”, United Nations Association of the United States of America,
Mutlak Güç Ya Da Sınırsız Sorumluluk: Devlet Egemenliği Ve Uluslararası Toplumun Koruma
Sorumluluğu
[155]
http://www.unausa.org/site/pp.asp?cfvKRI8MPJpF&b4134409 (03.02.2012).
DENG, F. M. vd. (1996). Sovereignty As Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa, Brooking Institution, Washington DC.
ECKERT, A. E. (2012). “Responsibility to Protect in the Anarchical Society: Power, Interest, and the Protection of Civilians in Libya and Syria”, Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 41(1): 87-99.
EVANS, G.ve SAHNOUN, M. (2002). “The Responsibility to Protect”, Foreign Affairs, 81(6): 99-110.
GIERYCZ, D. (2010). “From Humanitarian Intervention (HI) to Responsibility to Protect (R2P)”, Criminal Justice Ethics, (29)2: 110-128.
GÖZLÜGÖL, S. (2002). Avrupa İnsan Hakları Sözleşmesi ve İç Hukukumuza Etkisi, Hilmi Usta Matbaacılık, Ankara.
HAMILTON, R. J. (2006). “The Responsibility to Protect: From Document to Doctrine—But What of Implementation?”, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 19: 289-297.
HEHIR , A. (2008). Humanitarian Intervention after Kosovo Iraq, Darfur and the Record of Global Civil Society, Palgrave Macmillan, London.
HEHIR, A. (2010). Humanitarian Intervention: An Introduction, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
HEHIR, A. (2012). The Responsibility to Protect: Rhetoric, Reality and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention, Palgrave MacMillan, New York.
HOBBES, T. (1991). Man and Citizen, (der.) Bernard Gert, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis.
HOFFMAN, J. ve NOLKAEMPER, A. (2012). Responsibility to Protect From Principle to Practice, Pallas Publication, Amsterdam.
HOFFMANN, S. (2003). “Intervention: Should It Go On? Can It Go On?” (der.) Chatterjee and Scheid, Ethics and Foreign Intervention, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
HURD, I. (1999). “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics”, International Organization, 53(2):379-408.
ICISS Supplemantary Volume, s. 17, http://www.bits.de/NRANEU/docs/ICISS1201supplement.pdf (12.5.2015).
Adem Ali İREN - Muharrem GÜRKAYNAK - Mustafa ATATORUN
[156]
ICISS, (2001). “International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty”, http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICISS%20Report.pdf, 14.5.2015.
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE, Case Concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), 26 Şubat, 2007, paragraf 430, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/fi les/91/13685.pdf, (17.4.2015).
KI-MOON, B. (2009). Implementing the Responsibility to Protect, http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/implementing%20the%20rtop.pdf, (13.02.2012).
KRASNER, S. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
KRS’YE ATIF YAPAN BMGK KARARLARI hakkında daha fazla bilgi için bkz. http://www.globalr2p.org/resources/335 (18.5.2015).
LINKLATER, A. (2007). Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, Sovereignty and Humanity, Routledge, New York.
LU, C. (2006). Just and Unjust Interventions in World Politics: Public and Private, Palgrave MacMillan, New York.
MARTIN, S. (2011). “Sovereignty and The Responsibility to Protect Mutually Exclusive Or Codependent?” Griffith Law Review, C20(1): 153-187.
NANDA,V. P. (2011). “From Paralysis In Rwanda to Bold Moves In Libya: Emergence Of The ‘Responsibility To Protect’ Norm Under Internatıonal Law - Is the International Community Ready for It?”, Houston Journal of International Law, 34(1): 1-53.
ORFORD, A. (2011). International Authority and the Responsibility to Protect, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
POWER, S. (2013). A Problem from Hell: America and the Age of Genocide, Basic Books, London, 2013.
ROUSSEAU, J. J. (1968). The Social Contract, Penguin, London.
SIMONOVIC, I. (2000). "From Sovereign Equality to Equally Reduced Sovereignty", The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 24(2):163-174.
THAKUR, R. (2006), The United Nations Peace and Security, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
THAKUR, R. (2011). The Responsibility to Protect: Norms, Laws and the Use of Force in international Politics, Routledge, London.
Mutlak Güç Ya Da Sınırsız Sorumluluk: Devlet Egemenliği Ve Uluslararası Toplumun Koruma
Sorumluluğu
[157]
THAKUR, R. ve WEISS, T. (2009). “R2P: From Idea to Norm and Action?”, Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(1): 22-53.
THE UNITED NATIONS (2004). A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Changes
THE UNITED NATIONS (2005). In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All, http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/59/2005 (18.5.2015).
TOMUSCAT, C. (2008).Human Rights between Idealism and Realism, Oxford University Press, New York.
ÜNAL, Ş. (1994). “İnsan Haklarının Tarihi Felsefi ve Hukuki Temelleri”, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, (1): 41-74.
UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 260 (III), Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, A/RES/3/260 , Article I, http://www.un-documents.net/a3r260.htm, 13.3.2015).
WEBER, C. (1995). Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, The State, and Symbolic Exchange, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
ZIPPELIUS, R. (1965). Das Wesen des Rechts: Eine Einführung in die Rechtsphilosophie, Beck Verlag, München,

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com