You are here

Home » Content

Ortodontik tedavi amacıyla başvuran bir hasta populasyonunun incelenmesi

Evaluation of a population referred for orthodontic treatment

Journal Name:

  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Evaluation of patients referred for orthodontic treatment is of great importance for planning an ortodontic service. This study investigated social incurences, the cities where the patients referred from and treatment alternatives as well as distribution of malocclusions in a referred population. The material of the study was composed of 2844 (1662 girls, 1182 boys) patients referred to the Department of Orthodontics, Suleyman Demirel University, paculty of Dentistry between January 2002 and November 2004. Mean age of the subjects was 13.26 years. According to our results, patients were referred mostly from Antalya. Most of the patients had social insurance from Emekli Sandığı. Angle Class I was the most frequently seen malocclusion type and most common treatment alternative was the fixed orthodontic treatment.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Ortodontik tedavi olmak amacýyla kliniklere baþvuran hasta populasyonunun incelenmesi, klinik ihtiyaçlarýnýn bu bulgulara göre düzenlenmesi açýsýndan büyük önem taþýmaktadýr. Bu çalýþmada kliniðimize baþvuran hasta populasyonunda maloklüzyon daðýlýmýnýn yanýsýra, baþvurduklarý iller, baðlý olduklarý kurum ve öngörülen tedavi planlamalarý incelenmiþtir. Maloklüzyon tipleri Angle sýnýflamasýna göre belirlenmiþtir. Çalýþmamýzýn materyalini, Ocak 2002 ve Kasým 2004 tarihleri arasýnda Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Diþhekimliði pakültesi Ortodonti Kliniðine baþvuran 2844 hasta oluþturmaktadýr (1662 kýz, 1182 erkek). Bireylerin ortalama yaþý 13.26' dýr. Araþtýrmamýzýn sonuçlarýna göre kliniðimize baþvuran hastalarýn çoðunluðunun Antalya'dan geldiði (%42.83), hastalarýn en çok Emekli Sandýðýna baðlý olduðu (%48.35), çoðunda Angle Sýnýf I maloklüzyon bulunduðu (%65.65) ve en yüksek oranda sabit tedavi öngörüldüðü (%72.08) tespit edilmiþtir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ortodontik-tedavi-amaciyla-basvuran-bir-hasta-populasyonunun-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 3
23-26
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

-
Kliniğimize başvururan hastaların çoğu Antalya'dan gelmektedir (%42.83).
-
Hastaların çoğunluğu Emekli Sandığına bağlıdır
(%48.35).
-
Hastalarda en çok Angle SınıfI maloklüzyon tespit edilmiştir (%65.65).
-
Hastalar için en çok sabit tedavi öngörülmüştür
(%72.08).
Kaynaklar
1. Wood BF. Malocclusion in the modern Alaskan Eskimo. AmJOrthod. 1971;60:344-354.
2. Krzpow AB, Lieberman MA, Modan M. Prevalence of malocclusion in young adults of various ethnic backgroundsinIsrael.J DentRes. 1975;54:605-608.
S.D.Ü. Tıp Pak.
Derg
. 2005:12(3)/23-26
26
Sayın
, Hasta populasyonunun incelenmesi
3. Garner LD, Butt MH. Malocclusion in Black Americans and Nyeri Kenyans. An epidemiologic study. Angle Orthod. 1985;55:139-146.
4. Diagne F, Ba I, Ba-Diop K, Yam AA, Ba-Tamba A. Prevalence of malocclusion in Senegal. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993;21:325-326.
5. Otuyemi OD, Abidoye RO. Malocclusion in 12-year-old suburban and rural Nigerian children. Community DentHealth. 1993;10:375-380.
6. Lew KK, Foong WC, Loh E. Malocclusion prevalence in an ethnic Chinese population. Aust Dent J. 1993;38:442-449.
7. Tang EL. The prevalence of malocclusion amongst Hong Kong male dental students. Br J Orthod. 1994;21:57-63.
8. Harrison RL, Davis DW. Dental malocclusion in native children of British Columbia, Canada. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol.1996;24:217-221.
9. Ng'ang'a PM, Ohito F, Ogaard B, Valderhaug J. The prevalence ofmalocclusion in 13-to 15-year-old children in Nairobi, Kenya. Acta Odontol Scand. 1996;54:126-130.
10. Jacobson S, Lennartsson B. Prevalence of malocclusion and awareness of dental appearance in young adults. SwedDentJ. 1996;20:113-120.
11. Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANESIII survey. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1998;13:97-106.
12. Johnson M, Harkness M. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in 10-year-old New Zealand children. Aust Orthod J. 2000;16:1-8.
13. Silva RG, Kang DS. Prevalence of malocclusion among Latino adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:313-315.
14. Thilander B, Pena L, Infante C, Parada SS, de Mayorga C. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents in Bogota, Colombia. An epidemiological study related to different stages of dental development. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23:153-167.
15. Lauc T. Orofacial analysis on the Adriatic islands: an epidemiological study of malocclusions on Hvar Island. Eur J Orthod .2003;25:273-278.
16. Sari Z, Uysal T, Karaman AI, Basciftci FA, Usumez S, Demir A. Orthodontic malocclusions and evaluation of treatment alternatives:an epidemiologic study. Turkish J Orthod. 2003;16:119-126.
17. Jones WB. Malocclusion and facial types in a group of Saudi Arabian patients referred for orthodontic treatment: a preliminary study. Br J Orthod. 1987;14:143-146.
18. Yang WS. The study on the orthodontic patients who visited department of orthodontics, Seoul National University Hospital [abstract]. Taehan ChikkwaUisa
HyophoeChi. 1990;28:811-821.
19. Sayin MÖ, Turkkahraman H. Malocclusion and crowding in an orthodontically referred Turkish population. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:635-639.
20.
Ülge
n M. Ortodonti: Anomaliler, Sefalometri, Etioloji, Büyüme ve Gelişim, Tanı. Yeditepe Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul 2000;2-3.
21.
Tosu
n Y. Serbest Diş Hekimliğinde Ortodonti. Titizler Grafik & Ofset Baskı Hizmetleri, İzmir 2003;61.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com