You are here

Home » Content

Penil protezlerin gözden geçirilmesi ve gelişmeler

Journal Name:

  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Penile prosthesis surgery remains an indispensable treatment option for restoring erectile function in a selected patient group whom medical therapies such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors are contraindicated or who have failed. During the past few years, improvements particularly in inflatable prostheses' cylinder and pump design to provide good device concealment, to ease inflation and deflation, and to reduce complications such as infection. It is important for urologists, to follow these advances in technology in order to best treat their patients. The aim of the article is to provide a review of the more widely used implants and to give an idea of which prosthesis is suitable for spesific patients.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Penil protez cerrahisi erektil disfonksiyon tedavisinde fosfodiesteraz gibi medikal tedavinin kontrendike olduğu veya cevap alınamadığı seçilmiş hasta gruplarında halen vazgeçilmez tedavi seçeneği olarak bulunmaktadır. Son yıllarda özellikle şişirilebilir protezlerdeki silindir ve pompa dizayn gelişmeleri protezlerin saklanmasını kolaylaştırmış, kolay şişirme ve söndürme sağlamış, aynı zamanda infeksiyon gibi komplikasyonları azaltmıştır. Bu teknolojik yeniliklerin takibi ürologlar açısından hastalarına en iyi şekilde tedavi sunabilmeleri için önemlidir. Derlemenin amacı yaygın kullanılan penil protezlerin gözden geçirilmesi ve özellikli hastalar için hangi protezlerin uygun olacağıyla ilgili fikir verebilmektir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-penil-protezlerin-gozden-gecirilmesi-gelismeler.pdf
  • 3
32-37
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Meli
h Çulha: Penil Protezler. Editörler: Tellaloğlu S, Kadıoğlu A. Erkek Seksüel Disfonksiyonu. İstanbul, Nobel Tıp2000; 179-194
2. Goodwin WE, Scardino PL, Scott WW: Penile prothess for impotance: case report. JUrol 1981; 126: 409-410
3. Kim JH, Carson CC: History ofurologic prostheses for impotence. Prob Urol, 1993; 7: 283-88,.
4. Jonas U, Jacobi GH: Silicone silver penile prosthesis: prescription, operative approach and, results. J Urol, 1980; 123: 865-74
5. Furlow WL, Goldwasser B, Gundian JC. Implantation ofModelAMS 700penileprothesJUrol 1988;139:741-
2
6. Stanisic TH, Dean JC. The Flexi-Flate ve Flexi-Flate Ilpenile prothesses 1989;16:39-49
7. Mulcahy JJ. Implantation ofhydraulic penile prothess. Urol ClinNorthAm 1993;l:71-92
8. Liberman SN, Gomella LG, Hirsch IH. Experience with the Ultrex ve Ultrex Plus inflatable penile prothess: new implantation techniques ve surgical outcome. Int JImpotRes 1998;10:175-8
9. Milbank AJ, Montague DK, Angermeier KW, et al. Mechanical failure ofthe American Medical Systems Ultrex inflatable penile prosthesis: before and after 1993 structural modification. J Urol 2002; 167:2502-2506.
10. Montague DK, Angermeier KW. Increasing size with penile implants. CurrUrol Rep 2008; 9:483—486.
11. Wilson SK, Cleves MA, Delk JR. Comparison of mechanic reliability oforiginal ve enhanced Mentor Alpha I penile prothess. J Urol 1999;162:715-8
12. Garber BB. Coloplast Titan inflatable penile prosthesis with One Touch Release pump: initial results [abstract]. J Urol 2009; 181 (suppl 4):449; Abstract 1262. American Urological Association Annual Meeting, 25-30 April 2009. Chicago, Illinois, USA.
13. Brock G, Ralph D, Ritenour C, on behalfofthe Worldwide Titan OTR Investigators. Early clinician experience with the Titan One Touch Release (OTR) inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) [abstract]. J Sex Med 2009; 6 (suppl 1):26. Poster abstract #66. Fall Meeting ofthe Sexual Medicine Society ofNorth America (SMSNA), 16-19 October 2008, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
14. Brock GB, Ralph DR, Ritenour CWMR. Early results in patient satisfaction with the Titan One Touch Release (OTR) inflatable penile prosthesis [abstract]. J Sex Med 2009; 6 (Suppl 2):48. Podium abstractPD-011. Joint Congress ofthe European and International Societies for Sexual Medicine (ESSM-ISSM), 7-11 December 2008, Brussels, Belgium.
15. Quallich SA, Ohl DA, Dunn RL. Evaluation ofthree penile prosthesis pump designs in a blinded survey of practitioners. UrolNurs 2008; 28:101-105; 108.
16. Carson CC 3rd. Efficacy ofantibiotic impregnation of inflatable penile prostheses in decreasing infection in original implants. J Urol. Apr 2004;171(4):1611-4
17. Carson CC 3rd, Chapel hill NC: initial success with Ams 700 series inflatable penile prosthesis with inhibizone antibiotic surface treatment: A retrospective review ofrevision cases incidence and comparative results versus non -treated devices. AUA 99th Annual Meeting, Abstract 894, San Francisco, May 2004.
18. Wolter C et al. Hidrophilic-coated inflatable penile prosthesis: one year experience. AUA 99th Annual Meting, Abstract 896, San Francisco, May 2004.
19. Eid JF. What is new for inflatable penile prostheses? CurrOpinUrol2009, 19:582-588.
20. Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Carmignani G, Corbu C, Campo B, Ordesi G, et al. AMS three piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long-term multi-institutional study in 200 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 2000;37:50-
5.
21. Carson CC. Penile prothess implantation in the treatment ofPeyronie's disease. Int J Impot Res 1998;10:125-8.
22.. Penile prosthesis surgery: a review ofprosthetic devices and associated complications. 2007
Mar;4(2):296-309.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com