You are here

Home » Content

KELİME İLİŞKİLENDİRME TEST YÖNTEMİYLE KİMYA ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ GRAVİMETRİK ANALİZE İLİŞKİN BİLİŞSEL YAPILARININ İNCELENMESİ

EXAMINING COGNITIVE STRUCTURES OF CHEMISTRY TEACHER CANDIDATES ABOUT GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS THROUGH WORD ASSOCIATION TEST METHOD

Journal Name:

  • Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The first purpose of this study is to examine the cognitive structures of chemistry teacher candidates about gravimetric analysis by using word association test method. The other purpose is to explore the relationship between the teacher candidates’ performances in the the open-tailed examination about gravimetric analysis and the performances in the word association test. The sample of the study included 20 teacher candidates from Chemistry Education Department in GUGEF. Concept networks were constructed by using answer words in word association test. The concept networks indicated that teacher candidates considerably had difficulties in associating some of the concepts in gravimetric analysis to each other. Also, it is conceived that they were successful in linking between a few of the concepts. Moreover, when the scores gained from the examination were correlated with scores from the word association test, pearson correlation coefficient (r=0.71; p<0.05) displayed that a positive and significant correlation existed between them.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kelime ilişkilendirme test yönteminin fen eğitimindeki kullanımının tanıtılmasına da odaklanan bu çalışmanın birinci amacı gravimetrik analiz hakkında kimya öğretmen adaylarının bilişsel yapılarının kelime ilişkilendirme test yöntemi kullanılarak araştırılmasıdır. Çalışmanın ikinci amacı ise öğretmen adaylarının gravimetrik analize ilişkin açık uçlu sınavdaki başarıları ile kelime ilişkilendirme testindeki başarıları arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Çalışmanın örneklemini GÜGEF Kimya Eğitimi Anabilim Dalı 2. sınıfta öğrenim gören ve Analitik Kimya dersinde gravimetri konusunu tamamlamış olan öğretmen adaylarından 20 kişi oluşturmaktadır. Gravimetrik analiz konusundaki kelime ilişkilendirme testinden elde edilen cevaplardan hareketle kavram ağları oluşturulmuştur. Kavram ağları öğrencilerin gravimetrik analize ait bazı kavramları ilişkilendirmede güçlükler yaşadıklarını, bazı kavramlar arasındaki ilişkilendirmelerde ise oldukça başarılı olduklarını göstermiştir. Ayrıca öğretmen adaylarının kelime ilişkilendirme testinden aldıkları puanlar ile sınavdan aldıkları puanlar arasında korelasyon analizi yapıldığında pearson korelasyon katsayısı r=0,71 (p<0.05) olarak bulunmuştur. Bu sonuç bize açık uçlu sınav başarıları ile kelime ilişkilendirme testine ait başarıları arasında pozitif ve anlamlı bir ilişkinin varlığını göstermektedir
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kelime-iliskilendirme-test-yontemiyle-kimya-ogretmen-adaylarinin-gravimetrik-analize-iliskin-bilissel-yapilarinin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 1
107-125
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Anderson, O. R. (1992). Some interrelationships between constructivist models of learning
and current neurobiological theory, with implications for science education. Journal
of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 1037-1058.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart
and Winston.
Ausubel, D.P., Novak, J.D. & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A cognitive
view. New York, USA: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Bahar, M., Johnstone A. H. & Sutcliffe, R. G. (1999). Investigation of students’ cognitive
structure in elementary genetic through word association tests. Journal of Biological
Education, 33(3), 134-141.
Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: a theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical
Education, 63, 873-877. Gussarsky, E. & Gorodetsky, M. (1988). On the chemical equilibrium concept: constrained
word associations and conception. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 25 (5),
319-333.
Gussarsky, E. & Gorodetsky, M. (1990). On the concept “chemical equilibrium”: the
asociative framework. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 27 (3), 197-204.
Hauslein, P. L., Good, R. G. & Cummins, C. L. (1992). Biology content cognitive structure:
from science student to science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29,
939-964.
Johnson, P. E. (1965). Word relatedness and problem solving in high-school physics. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 56, 217-224.
Johnson, P. E. (1967). Some psychological aspects of subject-matter structure. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 58, 75-83.
Johnstone, A. H. & Moyniyan, T. F. (1985). The relationship between performances in word
association tests and achievement in chemistry. European Journal of Science
Education, 7 (1), 57-66.
Kempa, R. F. & Nicholls, C. E. (1983). Problem solving ability and cognitive structure - an
exploratory investigation. European Journal of Science Education, 5 (2), 171-184.
Kostova, z. & Radoynovska, B. (2008). Word association test for studying conceptual
structures of teachers and students. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education
Policy (BJSEP), 2(2), 209-231.
Moreira, M. A. & Santos, C. A. (1981). The influence of content organization on student’s
cognitive structure ın thermodynamics. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 18
(6), 525-531.
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and vee diagrams: two metacopgnitive tolls to facilitate
meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19, 29-52.
Posner GT. J., Strike K. A., Hewson P. W. & Gertzog W. A. (1982). Accomodation of a
scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66,
211-227.
Preece, P. F. W. (1976). Mapping cognitive structure: A comparison of methods. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 68(1), 1-8.
Preece, P. F. W. (1977). Development trend in the continued word associations of physics
students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14 (3), 235-239.
Preece, P. F. W. (1978). Exploration of semantic space: review of research on the
organization of scientific concepts in semantic memory. Science Education, 62 (4),
547-562.
Shavelson, R. J. (1974). Methods for examining representations of a subject-matter structure
in a student’s memory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 11, 231-249.
Shavelson, R. J. & Stanton, G. C. (1975). Construct validation: methodology and application
to three measures of cognitive structure. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12, 67-
85.
Skoog, D.A., West, D.M. & Holler, F.J. (1995). Analitik Kimya Temelleri-1. 7. Baskı, Çeviri
Editörleri: Kılıç, E. ve Köseğlu, F. Yayınevi: Bilim Yayıncılık, Ankara. Stewart, J. (1980). Techniques for assessing and representing information in cognitive
structure. Science Education, 64, 223-235.
Taşar, M. F. (2001) A case study of a novice college student’s alternative framework and
learning of force and motion. Doctor of Philosophy. Pennsylvania State University.
Tsai, C.-C., (1999). Content Analysis of Taiwanese 14 year olds’information processing
operations shown in cognitive structures following physics instruction, with relations
to science attainment and scientific epistemological beliefs. Research in Science &
Technological Education, 17(2), 125-138.
Tsai, C.-C., (2001). Probing students’ cognitive structures in science: the use of a flow map
method coupled with a meta-listening technique. Sudies in Educational Evaluation
27, 257-268.
Tsai, C.-C., & Huang C.-M., (2001). Development of cognitive structures and information
processing strategies of elemantary school students learning abourt biological
reproduction. Journal of Biological Education. 36 (1), 21-26.
Tsai, C.-C., & Huang C.-M., (2002). Exploring students’ cognitive structures in learning
science: A review of relevant methods. Journal of Biological Education. 36 (4), 163-
169.
West, L.H.T., Fensham, P.J. & Garrad, J.E. (1985). Describing the cognitive structures
following instruction in chemistry, in: L.H.T. West & A.L. Pines (Eds.) Cognitive
structures and conceptual change, pp.29-49. (Orlando, FL., Academic Press).
West L. H. T. & Pines A. L. (1985). Cognitive structures and conceptual change. Orlando,
FL, USA: Academic Press.
White, R. ve Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. New York: Falmer Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com