You are here

Home » Content

Retroperitoneoskopik Verici Nefrektomi Sonuçlarımız

Results of Retroperitoneoscopic Donor Nephrectomy at our Center

Journal Name:

  • Türk Nefroloji, Diyaliz ve Transplantasyon Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010
DOI: 
DOI 10.5262/tndt.2010.1003.05

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
OBJECTIVE: Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN), a variation of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy technique, has been reported only by a few centers. Here, we aimed to present the preliminary results of RDN at our center. Materi al and Metho ds: Fifteen consecutive RDNs were performed at our center from December 2009 to June 2010. The data obtained included donor age, sex, body mass index (BMI), operative time (OT), warm ischemia time (WIT), blood loss, and intra- and postoperative complications. Res ults : Mean donor age was 42.2±9.4 years with a mean BMI of 25.6 kg/m2. 53% (n=8) of the donors were females and 47% (n=7) males. The left kidney was procured in 73% (n=11) of the donors. The reason for procurement of the right kidney was multiple arteries on the left in all cases. Mean OT was 138±34 min, mean WIT was 170±58 s, and mean blood loss was 140±45 ml. One patient was converted to open surgery due to vena cava injury. All kidneys were successfully transplanted. The average creatinine level on postoperative day 7 was 1.02±0.26 mg/dl compared to 0.64±0.16 mg/dl before the operation. The mean length of hospital stay was 4±0.9 days. None of patients encountered postoperative complications. Conclusio n: RDN can be performed with acceptable intraoperative morbidity. The results of our series support the safety of RDN.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Son on yılda, verici nefrektomide standart yöntem laparoskopi olmuştur. Bununla birlikte laparoskopik tekniğin bir varyasyonu olan retroperitoneoskopik yöntem ancak belirli merkezlerde uygulanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, 15 olguya uyguladığımız retroperitoneoskopik verici nefrektomi (RVN) deneyimimiz ve sonuçlarını sunduk. Gereç ve Yönte mLER: Aralık 2009-Haziran 2010 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde 15 olguya RVN operasyonu uygulandı. Hasta verileri tıbbi kayıtlardan elde edildi. Verici yaşı, cinsiyeti, operasyondaki tahmini kan kaybı, sıcak iskemi süresi, hastanede kalış süresi, Vericinin operasyon öncesi ve operasyon sonrası birinci hafta, 1. ay ve 3. ay serum kreatinin düzeyleri, operasyon sırasında ve operasyon sonrası komplikasyonları değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Ortalama yaşı 42,2±9,4 (26-55) yıl olan 7’si erkek, 8’i kadın toplam 15 olguya RVN uygulandı. 11 olguda sol, 4 olguda ise sağ RVN uygulandı. Ortalama operasyon süresi 138±34 (70-195) dk idi. Ortalama sıcak iskemi süresi 170±58 (100-300) sn idi. Ortalama kan kaybı 140±45 (50-1200) ml idi. Sağ RVN yapılan bir hastada vena kava yaralanması nedeniyle açık ameliyata geçildi. Tüm böbrekler başarı ile nakledildiler. Operasyon sonrası hastanede kalış süresi ortalama 4±0,9 (3-6) gündü. Vericilerin operasyon öncesi kreatinin düzeyi ortalama 0,64±0,16 mg/dl, operasyon sonrası 1. haftada 1,02±0,26 mg/dL düzeyindeydi. Alıcıların kreatinin düzeyi ise operasyon sonrası 1. Haftada 1 mg/dL düzeyinde ve izlemlerinde aynı düzeyde izlendi. Operasyon sonrası komplikasyon izlenmedi. Sonuç: RVN, güvenli ve minimal invazif bir yöntemdir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_172977_19_pp_180-185.pdf
  • 3
180-185
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS,
Kavoussi LR: Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation
1995; 60:1047-1049
2. Schweitzer EJ, Wilson J, Jacobs S, Machan CH, Philosophe B,
Farney A, Colonna J, Jarrell BE, Bartlett ST: Increased rates of
donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 2000;
232:392-400
3. Gill IS, Uzzo RG, Hobart MG, Streem SB, Goldfarb DA, Noble
MJ: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal live donor right nephrectomy
for purposes of allotransplantation and autotransplantation. J Urol
2000; 164:1500-1504
4. Yang SC, Rha KH, Kim YS, Kim SI, Park K: Retroperitoneoscopyassisted
living donor nephrectomy: 109 cases. Transplant Proc
2001; 33:1104-1105
5. Bachmann A, Giannini O, Wolff T, Dickenmann M, Ruszat R,
Langer I, Gürke L, Gasser TC, Reich O, Stief CG, Steiger J, Sulser
T: Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: A comparison
with the open approach in respect of early postoperative pain
management. Transplant Proc 2005; 37:609-612
6. Yang SC, Ko WJ, Byun YJ, Rha KH: Retroperitoneoscopy assisted
live donor nephrectomy: The Yonsei experience. J Urol 2001;
165:1099-1102
7. Ruszat R, Sulser T, Dickenmann M, Wolff T, Gürke L, Eugster T,
Langer I, Vogelbach P, Steiger J, Gasser TC, Stief CG, Bachmann
A: Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: Donor outcome and
complication rate in comparison with three different techniques.
World J Urol 2006; 24:113-117
8. Gill IS, Carbone JM, Clayman RV, Fadden PA, Stone MA, Lucas
BA, McRoberts JW: Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. J
Endourol 1994; 8:143-148
9. Greco F, Hoda MR, Alcaraz A, Bachmann A, Hakenberg OW,
Fornara P: Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: Analysis of
the existing literature. Eur Urol 2010;
10. Ng CS, Abreu SC, Abou El-Fettouh HI, Kaouk JH, Desai
MM, Goldfarb DA, Gill IS: Right retroperitoneal versus left
transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urology
2004; 63:857-861
11. Tanabe K, Miyamoto N, Ishida H, Tokumoto T, Shirakawa H,
Yamamoto H, Kondo T, Okuda H, Shimmura H, Ishikawa N,
Nozaki T, Toma H: Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy
(RPLDN): establishment and initial experience of RPLDN at a
single center. Am J Transplant 2005; 5:739-745
Cilt/Vol: 19, No: 3, 2010, Sayfa/Page: 180-185 185
Türk N efroloji D iyaliz ve Transplantasyon D ergisi Özden E ve ark: Retroperitoneoskopik Verici Nefrektomi Sonuçlarımız
Turkish Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Journal
12. Bachmann A, Wyler S, Wolff T, Gürke L, Steiger J, Kettelhack C,
Gasser TC, Ruszat R: Complications of retroperitoneoscopic living
donor nephrectomy: Single center experience after 164 cases. World
J Urol 2008; 26:549-554
13. Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Tabibi A, Shakhssalim N, Hosseini
Moghaddam SM.: Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor
nephrectomy: A randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 2005; 95:
851-855
14. Leventhal JR, Kocak B, Salvalaggio PR, Koffron AJ, Baker TB,
Kaufman DB, Fryer JP, Abecassis MM, Stuart FP: Laparoscopic
donor nephrectomy 1997 to 2003: Lessons learned with 500 cases
at a single institution. Surgery 2004; 136:881-890
15. Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ, Sinkov
V, Bluebond-Langner R, Kavoussi LR: Laparoscopic live donor
nephrectomy: Trends in donor and recipient morbidity following
381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 2004; 240:358-363
16. Bachmann A, Wolff T, Ruszat R, Giannini O, Dickenmann M, Gürke
L, Steiger J, Gasser TC, Stief CG, Sulser T: Retroperitoneoscopic
donor nephrectomy: A retrospective, non-randomized comparison
of early complications, donor and recipient outcome with the
standard open approach. Eur Urol 2005; 48:90-96
17. Troppmann C, Daily MF, McVicar JP, Troppmann KM, Perez RV:
The transition from laparoscopic to retroperitoneoscopic live donor
nephrectomy: A matched pair pilot study. Transplantation 2010;
89:858-863
18. Koçak B, Açıkgöz A, Bilen C, Kar A, Sarıkaya Ş, Büyükalpelli
R: El yardımlı laparoskopik donör nefrektomi: İlk 40 vaka. Türk
Üroloji Dergisi 2009; 35:329-334
19. Yavaşçaoğlu İ, Doğan H, Gürsoy E, Kordan Y, Vuruşkan H, Oktay
B.: Laparoskopik donör nefrektomi: Erken dönem sonuçlarımız.
Türk Üroloji Dergisi 2010; 36:61-66
20. Simforoosh N, Bassiri A, Ziaee SA, Tabibi A, Salim NS,
Pourrezagholi F, Moghaddam SM, Maghsoodi R, Shafi H:
Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: The first
randomized clinical trial. Transplant Proc 2003; 35:2553-2554

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com