You are here

Home » Content

NORMAL EJEKSÎYO N FRAKSİYONU OLAN HEMODÎALÎZ HASTALARINDA SOL VE SAĞ VENTRİKÜL PERFORMANSININ SÎSTOLÎK ZAMAN ARALIKLARI İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

THE ASSESSMENT OF LEFT AND RIGHT VENTRICULAR PERFORMANCE WITH SYSTOLIC TIME INTERVALS IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS WITH NORMAL EJECTION FRACTION

Journal Name:

  • Türk Nefroloji, Diyaliz ve Transplantasyon Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1999

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this controlled study, left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular systolic time intervals (STI) were investigated in hemodialysis patients (HDp) with normal myocardial systolic function as assessed by ec'ocardiographic indicators like ejection fraction (EF). Echocardiographic findings in 88 HDp (M:F 47:41, mean age 35±11 years) and 73 healthy controls (M:F 31:42, mean age 36^10 years) were compared for STI parameters (prejection period (PEP), ejection time (ET) and STI index (PEP/ET)). Left ventricular PEP (114±21 ms vs. 95.4±3.6 ms, p<0.001) and STI index (0.41±0.11 vs 0.34±0.02, p<0.001) were higher in the HDp as compared to controls. There were no difference in RV STI parameters between two groups. The deteriorations of STI parameters in HDp were independent ofL V hypertrophy and hypertension. It was concluded that while RV performance seems not to be influenced by uremia, LV STI indexes deteriorate before an overt systolic dysfunction (normal EF), and impairment of STI indexes appear to be markers ofuremic cardiomyopathy, independent ofLV mass or hypertension.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu kontrollü çalışmada, global ejeksiyon fraksiyonu (EF) normal bulunan hemodializ hastalarında (HDp), sol (LV)ve sağ (RV) ventrikül sistolik zaman aralıkları (STİ) araştırıldı. Dialize giren 88 hasta (E:K 47:41, ortyaş 35±11 yıl) ile 73 sağlıklı birey (E:K 32:41, ort yaş 36± 10 yıl) ekokardiyografik olarak STI parametreleri (Preejeksiyon periyod (PEP), ejeksiyon zamanı (ET) ve STI indeks (PEP/ET)) bakımından karşılaştırıldı. Hemodializ hastalarında LV için PEP (114±21 ms e karşı 95.4±3.6ms, p<0.001) ve STIindeks (0.41±0.11 e karşı 0.34±0.02, p<0.001) kontrol grubuna göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksek bulunurken, RV sistolik zaman aralıkları normalden farklı bulunmadı. Hemodializ hastalarında artmış sol ventrikül STI indeksi ve PEP, LV hipertrofisi ve hipertansiyondan bağımsız idi. Sonuç olarak, üremik hastalarda RVperformansı üremiden etkilenmez görünürken, sol ventrikül STI parametreleri aşikar sistolik disfonksiyondan önce (normal EF ve FS), LV kitlesinden ve hipertansiyondan bağımsız olarak bozulmakta ve bu bulgu üremik kardiyomyopatinin göstergesi olarak gözükmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon pdf_tndt_257.pdf
  • 3
133-137
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Ritz E, Rambausek M, Mail G, Ruffmann K, Mandelbaum A. Cardiac changes in uraemia and their possible relationship to cardiovascular instability on dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1990;Suppl 1:93-97.
2. Parfrey PS, Foley RN, Harnett JD, Kent GM, Murray
DC, Barre PE: The outcome and risk factors for left ventricular disorders in chronic uremia. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1996;11:1277-1285.
3. Boudoulas H. Systolic time intervals. Eur Heart J
1990;ll(suppll):93-104.
4. Burwash I, Otto C, Pearlman A. Use of Doppler-Derived Left Ventricular Time Intervals for Noninvasive Assessment of Systolic Function. Am J
Cardiol 1993;72:1331-1333.
5. Hamada M, Hiwada K, Kokubu T. Clinical significance of systolic time intervals in hypertensive patients. Eur
Heart J 1990 Dec; 11 Suppl 1(15-13).
6. Declaration of Helsinki. Reccomendation guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. 41 st World Medical Assembly, Hong-Kong,
September 1989.
7. Henry WL, DeMaria A, Gramiak R, King DL; Kisslo JA; Popp RL; Sahn DJ; Schiller NB; Tajik A; Teichholz
LE; Weyman AE: Report of the American Society of Echocardiography Committee on nomenclature and standarts in two dimensional echocardiography.
Circulation 1980;62:212-5.
8. Sahn D.T, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M Mode echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978;58:1072-83.
9. Devereux RB, Koren NJ, deSimone P, Okin N, Klingfield P: Methods for detection of left ventricular hypertrophy: Application to hypertensive heart disease. Eur Heart J 1993;14(Suppl D):8
10. Devereux RB, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977;55:613-18.
11. Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Harnett JD, Kent GM, Martin CJ. Clinical and echocardiographic disease in patients starting end-stage renal disease therapy. Kidney Int 1995;47:186-192.
12. London GM, Marchais S.I, Guerin AP, Metivier F, Pannier B: Cardiac hypertrophy and arterial alterations in end-stage renal disease: Hemodynamic factors.
Kidney Int 1993; 43 (Suppl 41):42-49.
13. Bornstein A, Gaasch WH, Harrington J. Assessment of the cardiac effects of hemodialysis with systolic time intervals and echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1983 Jan 15;51(2):332-5.
14. Ulmer HE, Heupel EW, Scharer K. Long-term evaluation of cardiac function utilizing systolic time intervals in children with chronic renal failure. Int J
Pediatr Nephrol 1982 Jun;3(2):79-86.
15. Trznadel K, Luciak M, Wyszogrodzka M. The left ventricular systolic function after digoxin administration in patients with chronic renal failure.
Clin Nephrol 1980 May; 13(5):231-4.
16. Douglas PS, Tallant B. Hypertrophy, fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction in early canine experimental
hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991;17:530-6.
17. Mall G, Rambauseck M, Neumeister A. Myocardial interstitial fibrosis in experimental uremia. Implications for cardiac compliance. Kidney Int 1988;33:804-11.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com