You are here

İktidar Mücadelesi Olarak Dış Politika: 2007-8 Yıllarında Ak Parti ve TSK Arasında Bir Mücadele Alanı Olarak Kuzey Irak

Foreign Policy as Domestic Power Struggle: The Northern Iraq as a Battlefield Between the AKP and the TAF in 2007-8

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The issue of rapprochement with Kurdish parties in the Northern Iraq turned a discursive battlefield between Turkish Armed Forces (TAF) and the ruling Justice Development Party (AKP) after the 2005 General Elections in Iraq from which Kurdish groups emerged as a strong political actor in Iraqi politics. When the AKP government declared its policy of rapprochement with the Kurdish regional government at the beginning of 2007, the then Chief of General Staff Yaşar Büyükanıt publicly criticized and rejected this new policy. Büyükanıt declined to talk with Kurdish leaders on the grounds that they were supporting for the PKK. This exchange of statements was the part of a political snowball rolling to which other areas of the struggle were included. The rift between the AKP government and the TAF over how to deal with Iraqi Kurds started just as Turkey gears up for key presidential elections. This paper will attempt to analyze the battle over the Northern Iraq between the TAF and the AKP in order to answer the following questions: How the TAF and the AKP came face to face on the issue of the Northern Iraq? Under what conditions the Northern Iraq turned a discursive battlefield between the TAF and the AKP? What was the function of the Northern Iraq in the domestic power struggle between the TAF and the AKP?
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kuzey Irak’taki Kürt partiler ile yakınlaşma meselesi Kürt gurupların önemli aktör olarak ortaya çıktığı Irak’taki 2005 seçimlerinden sonra Türkiye’de Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri ve Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi arasında söylemsel bir çatışma alanına dönüştü. AK Parti hükümeti 2007’nin başlarında Kürt bölgesel yönetimi ile yakınlaşma beyanını açıklayınca, dönemin Genel Kurmay Başkanı Yaşar Büyükanıt açık bir şekilde bu politikayı eleştirdi. Büyükanıt Irak’taki Kürt partilerin PKK’yı desteklediğini gerekçe göstererek böylesi bir yakınlaşmaya karşı olduğunu açıkladı. Bu karşılıklı açıklamalar 2007 yılı içinde yaşanan AK Parti ve TSK arasındaki daha geniş ölçekli çatışmanın bir uzantısıydı. Söz konusu dış politika tartışması Türkiye’nin Cumhurbaşkanlığı seçimine doğru gittiği bir ortamda patlak vermişti. Bu makale şu sorulara cevap vermek amacıyla AK Parti ve TSK arasında Kuzey Irak üzerinden yaşanan gerilimi analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır: TSK ve AKP Kuzey Irak konusunda nasıl karşı karşıya geldiler? Hangi koşullar tarafları arasında Kuzey Irak’ı bir söylemsel çatışma zeminine dönüştürdü? Kuzey Irak’ın AK Parti ve TSK arasında o dönemde yaşanan güç mücadelesindeki işlevi ne oldu?
67
94

REFERENCES

References: 

Aydınlı, E. (2009), “A Paradigmatic Shift for the Turkish Generals and an
end to the Coup Era in Turkey”, The Middle East Journal, vol.
63, no. 4.
Balcı, A. (2011), “Türkiye’de Militarist Devlet Söylemi”, Kadim Yayınları,
Ankara.
Balcı, A. (2012), “Foreign Policy as Politicking in the Sarıkız Coup Plot:
Cyprus between the Coup Plotters and the JDP”, Middle East
Critique, vol. 21, no. 2.
Balcı, A. (2015), “The Kurdish Movement’s EU Policy in Turkey:
An Analysis of a Dissident Ethnic Block’s Foreign Policy”,
Ethnicities, vol. 15, no. 1.
Barkey, H. J. (2011), “Turkey and Iraq: The Making of a Partnership”,
Turkish Studies, vol. 12, no. 4.
Campbell, D. (1998), “Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy
and the Politics of Identity”, University of Minnesota Press,
Minneapolis.
Campbell, D. (2005), “The Biopolitics of Security: Oil, Empire, and the
Sports Utility Vehicle”, American Quarterly, vol. 57, no. 3.
Caporaso, J. A. et al. (1986 ), “The Comparative Study of Foreign Policy:
Perspectives on the Future”, International Studies Notes, vol. 13,
no. 2.
Cizre-Sakallıoğlu, Ü. (1997), “The Anatomy of the Turkish Military’s
Political Autonomy”, Comparative Politics, vol. 29, no. 2.
Cizre, Ü. (2008), “Ideology, Context and Interest: the Turkish military”, The
Cambridge History of Turkey: Turkey in the Modern World İçinde
Ed. Reşat Kasaba, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cizre, Ü. (2008), “The Justice and Development Party and the Military:
Recreating the Past after Reforming It”, Secular and Islamic
Politics in Turkey: The Making of the Justice and Development
Party İçinde Ed. Ümit Cizre, Routledge, London.
92
Ali Balcı
Davutoğlu, A. (2013), “Teoriden Pratiğe: Türk Dış Politikası Üzerine
Konuşmalar”, 2nd Edition, Küre Yayınları, İstanbul.
Duran, B. (2006), “JDP and Foreign Policy as an Agent of Transformation”,
The Emergence of a New Turkey: Democracy and the AK Party
İçinde Ed. Hakan Yavuz, The University of Utah Press, The Salt
Lake City.
Gunter, M. M. and Yavuz, M. H. (2007), “Turkish Paradox: Progressive
Islamists versus Reactionary Secularists”, Critique: Critical
Middle Eastern Studies, vol. 16, no. 3.
Gül, A. (2004), “Türkiye Küresel Barışın Teminatıdır”, Anlayış, No: 9,
June.
Hale, W. and Özbudun, E. (2010), “Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in
Turkey: The Case of the AKP”, Routledge, London.
Hale W. (2013), “Turkish Foreign Policy since 1774”, Routledge, London.
İnat, K. and Duran, B. (2006), “AKP Dış Politikası: Teori ve Uygulama”,
Demokrasi Platformu, vol. 1.
Karakaya-Polat, R. (2009), “The 2007 Parliamentary Elections in Turkey:
Between Securitisation and Desecuritisation”, Parliamentary
Affairs, vol. 62, no. 1.
Kardaş T. (2009), “Turkey: Secularism, Islam, and the EU”, The Borders
of Islam: Exploring Samuel Huntington’s Faultlines, from Al-
Andalus to the Virtual Ummah İçinde Ed. Tuncay Kardas, Stig
Jarle Hansen and Atle Mosey, Hurst, London.
Lundgren, A. (2007), “The Unwelcome Neighbour: Turkey’s Kurdish
Policy”, IB Tauris, London.
Müftüler Baç, M. and Gürsoy, Y. (2010), “Is There a Europeanization of
Turkish Foreign Policy? An Addendum to the Literature on EU
Candidates”, Turkish Studies, vol. 11, no. 3.
Nabers, D. (2009), “Filling the Void of Meaning: Identity Construction in
US Foreign Policy After September 11, 2001”, Foreign Policy
Analysis, vol. 5, no. 2.
93
Foreign Policy as Domestic Power Struggle:
The Northern Iraq as a Battlefield between the AKP and the TAF in 2007-8
Özcan, G. (2009), “Facing its Waterloo in Diplomacy: Turkey’s Military
in the Foreign Policy-Making Process”, New Perspectives on
Turkey, vol. 40.
Özcan, G. (2010), “The Changing Role of Turkey´s Military in Foreign
Policy Making”, UNISCI Discussion Papers, vol. 23.
Sarigil, Z. (2007), “Europeanization as Institutional Change: the Case of
the Turkish Military”, Mediterranean Politics, vol. 12, no. 1.
Taydaş, Z. and Özdamar, Ö. (2013), “A Divided Government, an Ideological
Parliament, and an Insecure Leader: Turkey’s Indecision about
Joining the Iraq War”, Social Science Quarterly, vol. 94, no. 1.
Uzgel, İ. (2003), “Between Praetorianism and Democracy: The Role of
the Military in Turkish Foreign Policy”, The Turkish Yearbook of
International Relations, vol. 34.
Yavuz, M. H. (2009), “Secularism and Muslim Democracy in Turkey”,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com