You are here


Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study we present an overview of the undergraduate blended Physics course that has been supported by the Moodle platform. The course that has been applied is a basic physics course for primary student teachers. The aim of Moodle is to create an online learning environment which helps students to have a virtual space where they can share knowledge through different kinds of supervised activities, chats and forums. Students have to enter Moodle and they have participated activities that have been offered by the instructor after the lesson every week. After the study, results have shown that teacher candidates using Moodle processing have positive thoughts about the course. In the study, it has been emphasized views of prospective primary teachers about MOODLE in some subjects of physics. Students are challenged to doing research. Prospective teachers tend to use this method in their professional life; therefore, it is recommend that offering challenging possibilities to them about their using. It is recommended that this application is become widespread in education (especially higher education in Turkey).



Alavi, M., & Dufner, D. (2005), Technology-mediated collaborative learning: A research perspective. In S. R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks. (pp. 191–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Antonenko, P. (n.d.). Modular object-oriented Dynamic Learning Environment: What open source has to offer, Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Chicago, N/A, 2004, October 19–23, 9p.
Bangert, A. W. (2004). The seven principles of good practice: A framework for evaluating on-line teaching. Internet and Higher Education, 7(3), 217–232.
Bedard-Voorhees (2005). Developing a Twenty-First Century Faculty: Institutional Structures and Strategies for Online Instruction. Retrieved June 8, 2006, at 226H
Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S.R., & Harasim, L. (2005). The online interaction learning model: An integrated theoretical framework for learning networks. In S.R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning networks. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2004). Becoming an online teacher: Adapting to a changed environment for teaching and learning in higher education. Educational Media International, 41(3), 231-244.
Berge, Z. L. (2000). Components of the online classroom. In R. E. Weiss, D. S. Knowlton &
B. W. Speck (Eds.), Principles of effective teaching in the online classroom. (pp. 23-28). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
BlackBoard (2007). 227H
Bower, B. L. & Hardy, K. P. (2004). From correspondence to cyberspace: changes and challenges in distance education. New Directions for Community Colleges, 128, 5–12.
Buddie, D. (2006, Jan. 30).. Zalatwic – Using MOODLE to accomplish things. Association for Learning Technology. Retrieved January 4, 2008, from 228H
Carmichael, A. (n.d.). Helping young people to learn at their own pace in a rural area Moodle. Retrieved January 4, 2008, from 229H
Claroline (2007). 230H
Cole, J. & Foster, H. (2008). Using Moodle. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Cole, J. (2005). Using Moodle: teaching with the Popular Open Source Course Management System. O’Reily Media Inc, USA: Sebastopol.
Conrad, R, & Donaldson, J. (2004). Engaging the online learner: Activities and resources for creative instruction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dougiamas, M., & Taylor, P. C. (2003) Moodle: using learning communities to create an open source course management system, in D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds) ED MEDIA2003: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on educational multimedia and hypermedia & world conference on educational telecommunications, 171-178. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education (AACE).
Durham Academy. (2008). Retrieved January 4, 2008, from
Hannafin, M.J. (1997, December). The case for grounded design: What the literature suggests about effective teaching, learning, and technology. Keynote presentation at the
meeting of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE), Perth, Australia. 232H
Hannafin, M. J., & Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced, student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25, 167-202.
Hirumi, A. (2005) ‘In Search of Quality: An Analysis of e-Learning Guidelines and Specifications’, Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6,4, p. 309–330.
Ilias. (2007). 233H
Kaminski, J. (February, 2005). Editorial: Moodle – a User-Friendly, Open Source Course Management System. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics (OJNI), Vol. 9, No. 1 [Online]. Available at 234H
Kenny, et al., 2006. A pilot study of problem formulation and resolution in an online problem-based learning course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. v7 i3.
Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2001). Teaching online: A practical guide. Boston7, Houghton Mifflin
Land, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2000). Student-centered learning environments. In D. Jonassen (Ed.) Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp.1-19) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Maikish, A. (2006). MOODLE: A free, easy, and constructivist online learning tool. MultiMedia & Internet@Schools, 13(3), 26-28.
Martín-Blas, T., & Serrano-Fernández, A. (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Computers & Education, 52, 35–44.
Morris, L. V., Wu, S.-S., & Finnegan, C. L. (2005). Predicting Retention in online general education courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 23–36.
Mudle, K. (2007, June 1). Our pupils are getting into a right Moodle! The Cumberland News. Retrieved January 4, 2008, from 235Hhttp://www.cumberlandnews.
236HNorman, C. (2006). Has Computing Changed Physics Courses?, Computing in Science and Engineering, v.8 n.5, p.4-5, September 2006 [doi>237H10.1109/MCSE.2006.88]
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass Publishers.
Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (2005). Collaborating online: Learning together in community. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Rice, W. H. (2006). Moodle e-learning course development. A complete guide to successful learning using Moodle. Packt Publishing
Richardson, W. (2006). Transcript Education Week, Saturday, October 14, 2006.
Romero, C., Ventura, S., Delgado, J. A., & Bra, P. D. (2008). Personalized links recommendation based on data mining in adaptive educational hypermedia systems. In Second European Conference on technology enhanced learning. Crete, Greece.
Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, M. H. (2004). Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional and Fully Online Graduate Courses International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Volume 5.
Rubin, L. (2006). Computational Physics: A Better Model for Physics Education?, Computing in Science and Engineering, v.8 n.5, p.22-30
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (2001). Problem Based Learning: An Instructional Model and Its Constructivist Framework (No. CRLT Technical Report No. 16-01). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University from 238H
SDUSD Educational Technology. (no date). Retrieved January 4, 2008, from 239H
TopClass. (2007). 240H
Tuzi, F. (2007, Jan. 26). Educators can manage course content with Moodle. Retrieved January 4, 2008, from 241H
WebCT (2007). 242H
Wolcott, L. L. (2003). Dynamics of faculty participation in distance education: Motivators, incentives, and rewards. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education. pp. 549-565. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Thank you for copying data from