You are here

Objective Evaluation in an Online Geographic Information System Certificate Program

Journal Name:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Departmental decisions regarding distance education programs can be subject to subjective decision-making processes influenced by external factors such as strong faculty opinions or pressure to increase student enrolment. This paper outlines an evaluation of a departmental distanceeducation program. The evaluation utilized several methods that strived to inject objectivity in evaluation and subsequent decision-making. A rapid multi-modal approach included evaluation methods of (1) considering the online psychosocial learning environment, (2) content analyses comparing the online version of classes to face-to-face versions, (3) cost comparisons in online vs. face-to-face classes, (4) student outcomes, (5) student retention, and (6) benchmarking. These approaches offer opportunities for departmental administrators and decision-making committees to make judgments informed by facts rather than being i
60-75

REFERENCES

References: 

Allen, M., Mabry, E., Mattrey, M., Bourhis, J., Titsworth, S., & Burrell, N.
(2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A
comparison using meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 54(3),
402-420.
Alstete, J. W., & Beutell, N. J. (2004). Performance indicators in online
distance learning courses: A study of management education.
Quality Assurance in Education, 12(1), 6-14.
73
73
Chalmers, L., Dibiase, D., Donert, K., Hardwick, S., & Solem, M. (2004).
Internationalizing online courses and degree programs in
geography. Retrieved October 25, 2004, from
http://www.gees.ac.uk/pigupapc.rtf
Commission of the European Communities. (2002). eEurope 2005: An
information society for all. Accessed November 16, 2004, from
http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/2002/news_libr
ary/documents/eeurope2005/eeurope2005_en.pdf
Diaz, D. P., & Cartnal, R. B. (1999). Students' learning styles in two classes:
Online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College
Teaching, 47, 130-135.
Dille, B., & Mezack, M. (1991). Identifying predictors of high risk among
community college telecourse students. American Journal of
Distance Education, 5(1), 24–35.
Dumont, R. (1996). Teaching and learning in cyberspace. IEEE
Transactions on Professional Communications, 39(4), 192–204.
Ehrmann, M. (1990). Psychological factors and distance education. The
American Journal of Distance Education, 4(1), 10–24.
Fraser, B. J. (1998a). Classroom environment instruments: Development,
validity and applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7-33.
Fraser, B. J. (1998b). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects
and determinants. In B. J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International
handbook of science education (pp. 527-564). London: Kluwer
Academic Publishers.
Fulkerth, R. (2002, November). Managing for course and program quality
in the online environment. Paper presented at the 2002 Teaching
Online in Higher Education Conference, Fort Wayne, IN. Retrieved
October 13, 2004, from
http://www.ipfw.edu/as/tohe/2002/Papers/fulkerth.htm
Gaudet, C. H., Annulis, H. M., & Carr, J. C. (2003). Building the geospatial
workforce. URISA Journal, 15, 21-30.
Geith, C., & Cometa, M. (1999). Cost analysis results: Comparing distance
learning and on-campus courses. Teaching, Learning, Technology
Group. Retrieved October 11, 2004, from http://www.tltgroup.org/
resources/F_Eval_Cases/Geith_Cometa.htm
Goh, S. C., & Khine, M. S. (Eds.). (2002). Studies in educational learning
environments: An international perspective. River Edge, NJ: World
Scientific.
Grabe, M., & Sigler, E. (2002). Studying online: Evaluation of an online
study environment. Computers and Education, 38, 375-383.
Gururajan, V. (2002). Knowledge management a new game in higher
education: A discussion paper on the new trends of technology
influencing the higher education landscape. In Focusing on the
Student. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Teaching Learning Forum,
5-6 February 2002. Perth: Edith Cowan University.
Harnar, M. A., Brown, S. W., & Mayall, H. J. (2000). Measuring the effects of
distance education on the learning experience: Teaching accounting
via PictureTel. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27, 37-
49.
74
74
Harris, R. (2003). Building a GIScience community in cyberspace:
Reflections on GIScOnline. Journal of Geography in Higher
Education, 27(3), 279-295.
Henderson, D., Fisher, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Interpersonal behavior,
laboratory learning environments, and student outcomes in senior
biology classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 26-43.
Hiltz, S. R., & Wellman, B. (1997). Asynchronous learning networks as a
virtual classroom. Communications of ACM, 40(9), 44–49.
Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London:
Routledge.
Kyle, W. C. (1997). Editorial: Assessing students' understanding of science.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 851-852.
Lægran, A. S. 2002. Geogra. pae nett–Interaktiv læring eller digital
distribusjon? Om integrering av IKT i undervisninge n ved Geogra.
sk institutt , NTNU. [Geography on the Net–Interactive learning or
digital distribution? On the integration of ICT in teaching at the
Department of Geography, NTNU.]. Norsk Geogra. sk Tidsskrift–
Norwegian Journal of Geography, 56, 230–234.
Molenda, M., & Harris, P. (2001). Issues and trends in instructional
technology. In R.M. Branch and M. A. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Educational
media and technology yearbook (Vol. 26, pp. 3-15). Englewood, CO:
Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass Publishers.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003, July 18). Distance
education at degree-granting postsecondary institutions: 2000-
2001. NCES Number: 2003017. Retrieved October 25, 2004, from
http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/peqis/publications/2003017
Olsen, J. K. (2000). Is virtual education for real?: Issues of quality and
accreditation. TechKnowLogia, 2(1), 16-18.
Posavac, E. J., & Carey, R. G. (2002). Program evaluation: Methods and
case studies (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Pretorius, R. W. (2004). An environmental management qualification
through distance education. International Journal of Sustainability
in Higher Education, 5(1), 63-80.
Rovai, A. P. (2003). A practical framework for evaluating online distance
education programs. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 109-124.
Scriven, M. S. (1981). The logic of evaluation. Inverness, CA: Edgepress,
Shea, T., Motiwalla, L., & Lewis, D. (2001 November/December). Internetbased
distance education—the administrator’s perspective. Journal
of Education for Business, 112-117.
Skilbeck, M. (2001). Panel discussion: The e-learning revolution—
Implications for academic work and university culture. In Online
learning in a borderless market. Proceedings of a conference held
15–16 February 2001 at Griffith University Gold Coast Campus (pp.
59-63). Canberra: Department of Education, Training, and Youth
Affairs.
Solem, M. N., Bell, S., Fournier, E., Gillespie, C. M., Lewitsky, M., & Lockton,
H. (2003). Using the Internet to support international
collaborations for global geography education. Journal of
Geography in Higher Education, 27(3), 239-53.
75
75
Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a
constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the
university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 357-
442.
Verduin, J. R., & Clark, T. (1991). Distance education:The foundations of
effective practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Walker, S. L. (2003). Development and validation of an instrument for
assessing distance education learning environments in higher
education: The DELES. Doctoral thesis, Curtin University of
Technology, Perth, Western Australia.
Walker, S. L., & Resta, P. (2002 September). Collaborating for online
instruction. Invited speakers for the 2002 Technology Leadership
Academy Fall Institute, Technology Leadership Institute, University of
Texas, Austin, Texas.
Westbrook, T. S. (1997). Changes in students’ attitudes toward graduate
business instruction via interactive television. The American Journal
of Distance Education, 11(1), 55–69.
Wikle, T. A. (1999). GIS education through certificate programs. URISA
Journal, 11, 53-60.
Woolcot, L. L. (1997). Tenure, promotion, and distance education:
Examining the culture of faculty rewards. American Journal of
Distance Education, 11(2), 3–18.
Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Program
evaluation: alternative approaches and practical guidelines (2nd
ed.). New York: Longman.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com