You are here

ATTITUDES OF TURKISH DISTANCE LEARNERS TOWARD INTERNET-BASED LEARNING: An Investigation Depending on Demographical Characteristics

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study is to develop an attitude scale toward Internet-based learning (IBL) and to investigate whether attitude levels of Turkish distance learners in an IBL environment differ according to their demographical characteristics (i.e. age, gender, marital status, parental status, employment status, grade point average (GPA). Research data were gathered from 804 (491 male and 313 female) learners in an IBL environment at Sakarya University, Turkey. Explanatory factor analysis identified three factors with eigenvalues >1. The scale appears to be a reliable and valid instrument to assess the attitude levels of learners toward IBL. The analyses of demographical characteristic differences on the scale indicate that married learners, working learners and learners with children have significantly higher attitude levels toward IBL than those of unemployed and single learners and learners with no children. Male distance learners demonstrate significantly higher attitude levels than females do on the majority of the subscales. In general, learners over age of 26 have statistically higher attitude levels than those of younger learners. Attitude levels of learners with poor GPAs are significantly lower than those of learners with better GPAs. The findings are consistent with the related literature.
97-84

REFERENCES

References: 

Albaracin, D., Zanna, M. P., Johnson, B. T., & Kumkale, T. (2005). Attitudes:
Introduction and scope. In Albaracin, D.(Ed), Handbook of attitudes (p.p.3-19).
Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence, Erlbaum Associates
Biner, P. M. & Dean, R.S. (1995). Re-assessing the role of student attitudes in the
evaluation of distance education effectiveness. The Distance Educator, 1(4), 10-11.
Biner, P. M., Welsh, K. D., Barone, N. M., Summers, M., & Dean, R. S. (1997). The impact
of remote-site group size on student satisfaction and relative performance in
interactive telecourses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(1), 23-33.
Bisciglia, M. & Monk-Turner, E. (2002). Differences in attitudes between onsite and
distance site students in group teleconference courses. The American Journal of
Distance Education, 16 (1), 37-52.
Brinkerhoff, J. & Koroghlanian, C. M. (2005). Student computer skills and attitudes
toward Internet-delivered instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32
(1), 27-56.
Carswell, L., Thomas, P., Petre, M., Price, B., Richards, M. (2000). Distance education
via the Internet: the student experience. British Journal of Educational Technology,
31(1), 29-47.
Cragg, C. E., Edwards, N., Yue, Z., Xın, S. L. & Huı, Z. D. (2003). Integrating Web-based
Technology into Distance Education for Nurses in China: Computer and Internet Access
and Attitudes. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 21 (5), 265-275.
Cramer, S. S., Havice, W. L. & Havice, P. A. (2002). Attitudes toward computermediated
distance training. The Journal of Technology Studies, 28 (1), 70-75.
Demiray, U. (1990). Turkey's Open Education Faculty. Journal of Industry and Higher
Education, 4 (1), 53-54.
Demiray, U. (1991). Identification of the distance education students in Turkey: A Case
study Open Education Faculty. Indian Journal of Distance Education, 4, 83-91.
Durndell, A. & Haag, Z. (2002). Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes
towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East
European sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 521–535
Durndell A, Glissov P., & Siann G (1995). Gender and computing: Persisting differences.
Educational Research, 37 (3) 219-227.
Durndell A. & Thomson K. (1997). Gender and computing: a decade of change.
Computers in Education, 28 (1) 1-9.
Gal-Ezer, J. & Lupo, D. (2002). Integrating Internet tools into traditional CS distance
education: Students' attitudes. Computers & Education, 38 (4), 319-330
82
Hannay, M. & Newwine, T. (2006). Perceptions of distance learning: A comparison of
online and traditional learning . MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 2
(1), [Online] Retrieved April 28, 2007, from http://jolt.merlot.org/Vol2_No1.htm
Havice, W. L. (1999). College students‘ attitudes toward oral lectures and integrated
media presentations. The Journal of Technology Studies, 25(1), 51–55.
Insight, The South Central Instrument Library and Data Repository (2005). Distance
Education Learning Environment Survey. Retrieved December 1, 2006, from
http://insight.southcentralrtec.org/instruments/
Kahl, T.N. & Cropley, A.J. (1986). Face to face versus distance learning: psychological
consequences and practical implications. Distance Education 7 (1), 38-48.
McIsaac, M.., Murphy, K. L. & Demiray, U. (1988). Examining distance education in
Turkey. Journal of Distance Education, 9 (1), 106-119.
Maushak, N. J. Ellis, K. A. (2003). Attitudes of graduate students toward mixed-medium
distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4 (2), 129-142.
Mayzer, R. & Dejong, C. (2003). Student satisfaction with distance education in a
criminal justice graduate course. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 14 (1), 37-52.
O‘Lawrence, H. (2006). The influences of distance learning on adult learners.
Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, 81 (5), 47-49.
Reisslein, J., Seeling, P. & Reisslein, M. (2005). Video in distance education: ITFS vs.
web-streaming: Evaluation of student attitudes. Internet & Higher Education, 8 (1), 25-
44.
Robertson, S. I., Calder, J., Fung, P., Jones, A., & O‘Shea, T. (1995). Computer attitudes
in an English secondary school. Computers & Education, 24(2), 73–81.
Schumacher, P. & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001) Gender, Internet and computer attitudes
and Experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 95-110
Shashaani L. (1994). Gender differences in computer experience and its influence on
computer attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research,11(4), 347-367.
Shih, C-C. & Gamon, J. (2001). Web-based learning: relationships among student
motivation, attitude, learning styles, and achievement. Journal of Agricultural
Education, 42 (4), 12-20.
Smith, D.L. & McNelis, M. J. (1993). Distance Education: Graduate Student Attitudes
and Academic Performance. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No: ED 360 948.
Sorensen, C. K. (1995). Evaluation of interactive television instruction: assessing
attitudes of community college students. DEOSNEWS, 5(9). [Online] Retrieved
December 20, 2006 from http://www.ed.psu.edu/ACSDE/deos/deosnews/deosnews5_9.asp
Su, B., Bonk, C. J., Magjuka, R. J., Liu, X., & Lee, S. (2005). The Importance of
Interaction in Web-Based Education: A Program-level Case Study of Online MBA
83
Courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1). [Online] Retrieved 24 December,
2006, from http://www.ncolr.net/jiol/issues/PDF/4.1.1.pdf
Thompson, B. & Daniel, L.G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity
of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological
Measurement, 56 (2), 197-208.
Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Tsai, M.J. (2001).Developing an Internet attitude scale for
high school students. Computers & Education, 37(1), 41-51.
Usun, S. (2003). Educational uses of Internet in the world and Turkey: A comparative
review. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 4(3). [Online] Retrieved
December 15, 2006 from
http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde11/index.htm
Valenta, A.,Therriault, D., Dieter, M., & Mrtek, R. (2001). Identifying student attitudes
and learning styles in distance education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,
5(2), 111-127.
Verduin, Jr., J. R., & Clark, T. (1991). Distance education: The foundations of effective
practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Whalstrom, C., Williams, B. K., & Shea, P. (2003). The Successful Distance Learning
Student. Belmont, CA; Scratchgravel.
Williams, M. L., Pabrock, K., & Covington, B. (1999). Distance learning: The essential
guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Zhang, P. (1998). A case study on technology use in distance learning. Journal of
Research on Computing in Education, 30(4), 398- 419

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com