You are here

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TEACHER IMMEDIACY BEHAVIOURS AND DISTANT LEARNERS‘ SOCIAL PRESENCE PERCEPTIONS IN VIDEOCONFERENCING APPLICATIONS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Videoconferencing systems combine face-to-face and mediated interactions in distance education. We extend the use of a Social Presence measure to on-site (face-to-face) learners and distant learners. Comparison between physically present and distant located learners did not indicate significant differences in social presence. Also results indicate that the predicted social presence score for distance instruction is slightly lower than for the on-site instruction for high nonverbal behavior while the reverse is true of low non verbal behaviors. Predicted social presence for face to face instruction is quite higher than for the distance instruction for the high verbal behaviors while the reverse is true of low verbal behaviors. It means that students‘ social presence is predicted to be higher in the face to face setting comparing to the videoconferencing course in both models. Additionally, when both nonverbal and verbal behaviors increase, the predicted social presence is facilitated, controlling for the grouping variable. In other words, instructors‘ nonverbal and verbal communication skills enhance learners‘ social presence in either environment.
180-192

REFERENCES

References: 

Andersen, J., Andersen, P., & Jensen, A (1979). The measurement of nonverbal
Immediacy. Journal of Applied Communication, 7, 153-180.
Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. New
Jersey: Transaction Books.
Argyle, M. & Dean, J. (1965). ― Eye contact, distance and affiliation‖. Sociometry,
28,289-304.
Booth- Butterfield, S., Mosher, N., & Mollish, D. (1992). Teacher Immediacy and
student involment: Adual process analysis.Communication Research
reports,9, 13-22.
Burgeon, J., Buller, D., & Woodall, W. (1996). Nonverbal Communication: The
unspoken Dialogue (2.nd): McGraw-Hill.
191
Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors,
student motivation and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
Daft, R. L.,& Lengel, R. H. ( 1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial
behaviour and organizational design. Research in organizational Behaviour, 6, 191-233.
DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and application, Sage Publications,
California.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (1995). SPSS: Step by step. Belmont CA: Wadsworth
Publishing.
Griffiths, D., Stirling, D. W., & Weldon, L. K. (1998). Understanding Data: Principles &
practice of statistics. Queensland: John Wiley & Sons.
Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and
student learning. Communication Education. 37, 40-53.
Hackman, M & Walker, K. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised
classroom: the effects of system design and teacher immediacy on student learning and
satisfaction. Communication Education. 39 (3), 196-206.
Kydd, C.T. & Ferry, D.L. (1994). Managerial use of videoconferencing. Information &
Management, 27 (6), 369-375.
McIsaac, M. S., & Gunawardena, C.N. (1996).Distance Education. In Jonassen, D
(ed.) Handbook for research on educational communications and technology, Scholastic
Press, New York, pp.403-437.
Mehribian, A. (1967). Attitudes inferred from non-immediacy of verbal communication.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 6, 294-295.
Murphy, K. L., & Farr, C.W.(1993). The critical role of the ID in interactive television: The
value of immediacy. In proceedings of selected research and development presentations
at the convention of the AECT sponsored by the Research and Theory Division, New
Orleans, LA, January 13-17.
Netemeyer, R. G, Bearden, W. O and Sharma, S. (2003): Scaling Procedures: Issues and
Applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Newliep, J. (1997). Communication Research a cross-cultural comparison of teacher
immediacy in American and Japanese College classrooms. Communication Education,
24(4), 431.
Richmond,V.P., Gorham, J.S., & McCroskey, J.C.(1987). The relationship between
selected immediacy behaviours and cognitive learning. In M. McLauhhlin (Ed.),
Communication Yearbook 10 (pp. 574-590). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Johnson, A. E. (2003). Development of the Nonverbal
Immediacy Scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy.
Communication Quarterly, 51, 502-515.
192
Rifkind, L. J. (1992). Immediacy is a predictor of teacher effectiveness in the
instructional television classroom.Journal of Interactive Television, 1(1), 31-38.
Sanders, J. A., & Wiseman, R. L.(1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal
teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective and behavirol learning
in the multiculturel classroom. Communications Educations, 39, 341-353.
Short, J., Willliams, B., & Christie, B (1976). The Social Psycholgy of elecommunications.
London: Wiley.
Siktin, S., Sutcliffe, K., & Barrios- Choplin, J. (1992). A Dual- Capacity Model of
communication Media Choice in Organizations. Human Communication
Research, 18 (4), 563-598.
Thweatt, K. S., McCroskey, J. C. (1996). Teacher nonimmediacy and misbehavior:
Unintentional negative communication. Communication Reseach Reports, 13 (2),
198-204.
Titsworth, B. S. (2001). Immediate and delayed effects of interest cues and engagement
cues on students‘ affective learning. Communication Studies,
52, 169-179.
Trevino, L., Lengel, R. & Daft, R. ( 1987). Media Symbolizm, Media Richness, and
media Choice in Organization. Communications Research, 14( 5), 553-574.
Walter, J.B. & Burgoon, J.K. ( 1992). Relational Communication in computer-mediated
interaction, Human Communication Research, 19 (1), 50-88.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com