You are here

CONDUCTING A TRIAL OF WEB CONFERENCING SOFTWARE: Why, How, and Perceptions from the Coalface

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper reports on the trial of web conferencing software conducted at a regional Australian university with a significant distance population. The paper shares preliminary findings, the views of participants and recommendations for future activity. To design and conduct the trial, an action research method was chosen because it is participative and grounded in experience, reflecting the context and objectives of the trial. In the first phase of the trial, students in postgraduate Education courses were linked across the globe to participate in interactive and collaborative conference activity and to communicate via audio, text, and video and shared whiteboard. Mathematical problem-solving was carried out collaboratively in an undergraduate course using tablet PCs. This was followed by phase 2, a universitywide trial across disciplines. Preliminary findings indicate that web conferencing software enables teachers and students at the university to engage actively across diverse locations, supporting a student-centred approach and greater flexibility in terms of where, when and how students learn. From these findings, the authors have made some initial recommendations to university management on the adoption of web conferencing to support learning and teaching.
19-28

REFERENCES

References: 

Birch, D. & Volkov, M. (2005). Students' perceptions of compulsory asynchronous
online discussion. Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC)
Conference 2005: Broadening the Boundaries, 05-07 December, Fremantle, Western
Australia.
Dalsgaard, C. (2006). Social software: E-learning beyond learning management
systems. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning. Retrieved March 2,
2008, http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Christian_Dalsgaard.htm
de Byl, P. & Taylor, J. A. (2007). A web 2.0/web3D hybrid platform for engaging
students in e-learning environments. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education,
8(3). 108-127.
28
Hafeez-Baig, A. & Danaher, P. A. (2007). Future possibilities for mobile learning
technologies and applications at the University of Southern Queensland, Australia:
Lessons from an academic focus group. 1st International Conference on Mobile
Learning Technologies and Applications, 19 Feb., New Zealand: Auckland. Retrieved
March 16, 2008, from http://eprints.usq.edu.au/2042
Harman, C. & Dorman, M. (1998). Enriching distance teaching and learning of
undergraduate mathematics using videoconferencing and audiographics, Distance
Education, 19( 2), 299-318.
Kulathuramaiyer, N. & Maurer, H. (2007). Current Development of Mashups in Shaping
Web Applications. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World
Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007
(pp. 1172-1177). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Loch, B. & McDonald, C. (2007). Synchronous chat and electronic ink for distance
support in mathematics, Innovate 3(3).
Reushle, S. E. (2005). Inquiry into a transformative approach to professional
development for online educators, doctoral thesis, USQ.
Reushle, S. E. (2006). A framework for designing higher education e-learning
environments. E-Learn 2006 World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate,
Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education, 13-17 Oct., Hawaii: Honolulu. Retrieved
March 14, 2008, from http://eprints.usq.edu.au/1226
Rowe, S., Ellis, A., & Bao, T. Q. (2006). The evolution of audiographics: A case study of
audiographics teaching in a business faculty. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ASCILITE
conference: Who’s learning? Whose technology? Retrieved March 2, 2008, from
www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney06/proceeding/pdf_papers/p194.pdf
Salmon, G. (2000). Learning submarines: Raising the periscopes. Retrieved January
18, 2008, from http://www.flexiblelearning.net.au/nw2000/main/key03.htm
Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved
March 2, 2008, from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
Smith G.G., & Ferguson D. (2004). Diagrams and math notation in e-learning: growing
pains of a new generation, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science
and Technology, 35(5), 681-695.
The New Media Consortium & EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative. (2006). The Horizon
Report, 2006 edition. Retrieved March 2, 2008, from
http://www.nmc.org/pdf/2006_Horizon_Report.pdf
Thompson, J. (2007). Is Education 1.0 ready for Web 2.0 students? Innovate, 3(4).
Retrieved March 14, 2008, from
http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=393
Wood, L. (2007). The transition to professional work. Australian Mathematical Society
Gazette, 34(5).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com