You are here

DİNİ SOSYALLEŞME: ETKİ KAYNAKLARI VE ARAÇLARIN ETKİLERİ

RELIGIOUS SOCIALIZATION SOURCES OF INFLUENCE AND INFLUENCES OF AGENCY

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.3956
Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Religious socialization is an interactive process through which social agents influence individuals’ religious beliefs and understandings. People interact with a variety of different agents of socialization over the life course, and these individuals, organizations, and experiences channel the beliefs and understandings that constitute religious preferences – and these preferences help inform commitments to religious organizations. Agents of socialization influence individuals only if the source is a trusted and valued connection, and experiences can only inform religious understandings if they are salient for religious faith. Individuals have considerable agency to reject socialization pressure, and to choose which connections guide religious preferences. The temporal ordering of contact with agents of socialization is clearly important. Family, peer group, media, religious institutions (mosqueschurches), school are considered as an important factors in the sociology for the religious socialization of individuals/youths. In this study, author begins by elaborating a theoretical foundation for the study of religious influence and religious socialization. He draws on contemporary theory and research on social movements and the sociology of religion, particularly on the nature of religious preferences and endogenous and exogenous sources of preference change. The nexus between these arenas of social research is crucial for an integrative perspective on socialization geared toward ideologically structured collective action. Next, he reviews research documenting the influence of various socialization agents. Finally, he provides a general assessment of the prospects for future research on socialization and how they fit into important theoretical debates in the sociology of religion.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Dini sosyalleşme, sosyal etmenler aracılığıyla bireylerin dini inançlarını ve anlayışlarını etkileyen interaktif bir süreçtir. İnsanlar hayat boyunca farklı sosyalleşme özneleriyle etkileşim içinde olurlar ve bu bireyler, organizasyonlar ve tecrübe kanalları inanç ve anlayışları ki onlar da dini tercihleri oluştururlar ve bu tercihler dini organizasyonlara sorumluluklarını gösterme adına yardım ederler. Eğer sosyalleşme kaynakları güvenilir ve değerli bağlantı sağlıyorsa sosyalleşme araçları bireyleri etkiler ve eğer kaynakların dini inançları belirgin ise yaşantılar da dini anlayışları pekiştirir. Bireyler sosyalleşmenin baskısını reddetmek ve hangi araçların dini tecrübelere (tercihlere) rehberlik ettiğini seçmek için ciddi araçlara sahiptirler. Sosyalizasyon ajanları ile temasın zamansal sıralaması da açıkça önemlidir. Bireylerin dini sosyalleşmesinde aile, okul, din kurumları (cami, kilise), arkadaş grubu ve medya etkili faktörler olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışmada yazar öncelikle dini sosyalleşme ve dini etki çalışmalarının teorik temellerilerine dikkatle eğilerek başlıyor. Ardından özellikle dini tercihlerin niteliğini ve bu tercihlerdeki değişikliğin iç ve dış dinamiklerini sosyal hareketler ve din sosyolojisi konusundaki çağdaş kuram ve araştırmaları üzerine bir çerçeve çizerek devam ediyor. Sosyal araştırma ve din araştırmaları alanındaki bağlar çok ideolojik olarak yapılandırılmış kollektif eyleme doğru sosyalleşme üstünde bütüncül bir perspektif elde etmek için çok önemlidir. Daha sonra yazar, alanla ilgili yapılan çalışmalarda değişik sosyalleşme araçlarının etkisini gözden geçiriyor. Nihayet, gelecekte sosyalleşme üzerine yapılacak çalışmalar için konuya ilişkin bakış açılarının genel değerlendirmesini ve onların din sosyolojisindeki önemli teorik çalışmalar içinde nereye oturacağına dair fikirler ileri sürüyor
279-297

REFERENCES

References: 

ACOCK, Alan, and Vern BENGTSON. 1978. “On the Relative Influence of Mothers and Fathers:
A Covariance Analysis of Political and Religious Socialization.” Journal of Marriage and
the Family 40: 519–30.
ACOCK, Alan. 1984. “Parents and Their Children: The Study of Inter-Generation Influence.”
Sociology and Social Research 68: 151–71.
AKERLOF, George A. 1997. “Social Distance and Social Decisions.” Econometrica 65: 1005–27.
BAGWELL, Laurie Simon, and B. Douglas BERNHEİM. 1996. “Veblen Effects in a Theory of
Conspicuous Consumption.” American Economic Review 86: 349–73.
BENGTSON, Vern L. 1975. “Generation and Family Effects in Value Socialization.” American
Sociological Review 40: 358–71.
BENGTSON, Vern L., and Joseph A. KUYPERS. 1971. “Generational Difference and the
Developmental Stake.” Aging and Human Development 2: 249–60.
BENGTSON, Vern L., and K. D. BLACK. 1973. “Intergenerational Relations and Continuities in
Socialization.In Paul Baltes andWarner K. Schaie, eds., Life Span Developmental
Psychology: Personality and Socialization (pp. 207–34). New York. Academic Press.
BENGTSON, Vern L., and Lillian TROLL. 1978. “Youth and Their Parents: Feedback and
Intergenerational Influence in Socialization.” In Richard M. Lerner and Graham B.
Spanier, eds., Child Influences on Marital and Family Interaction: A Life-Span Perspective
(pp. 215–40). New York:
BERNHEİM, B. Douglas. 1994. “A Theory of Conformity.” Journal of Political Economy 102:
841–77.
COLLİNS, Randall1993. “Emotional Energy as the Common Denominator of Rational Action.”
Rationality and Society 5: 203–30.
CORNWALL, Marie. 1989. “The Determinants of Religious Behavior: A Theoretical Model and
Empirical Test.” Social Forces 68: 572–92.
DE VAUS, David, and Ian MCALLİSTER. 1987. “Gender Differences in Religion.” American
Sociological Review 52: 472–81.
DİLLON, Michele, and Paul WİNK. In press. “American Religion, Generativity, and the
Therapeutic Culture.” In Ed de St. Aubin, Dan McAdams, and T. Kim, eds., The
Generative Society.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
DİLLON, Michele. 1995. “Religion and Culture in Tension: The Abortion Discourses of the U.S.
Catholic Bishops and the Southern Baptist Convention.” Religion and American Culture: A
Journal of Interpretation 5: 159–80.
DİLLON, Michele. 1999a. Catholic Identity: Balancing Reason, Faith, and Power. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
DİLLON, Michele, and Paul WİNK. In press. “American Religion, Generativity, and the
Therapeutic Culture.” In Ed de St. Aubin, Dan McAdams, and T. Elster, Jon. 1983. Sour
Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FİNKE, Roger, and Rodney STARK. 1988. “Religious Economies and Sacred Canopies: Religious
Mobilization in American Cities, 1906.” American Sociological Review 53: 41–9.
Dini Sosyalleşme: Etki Kaynakları ve Araçların Etkileri 293
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 8/3, Winter 2013
FİNKE, Roger, and Rodney STARK. 1992. The Churching of America, 1776–1990: Winners and
Losers in Our Religious Economy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
FİNKE, Roger, and Rodney STARK. 1998. “Religious Choice and Competition,” American
Sociological Review 63: 761–6.
FİNKE, Roger. 1992 “An Unsecular America.” In Steve Bruce, ed., Religion and Modernization:
Sociologists and Historians Debate the Secularization Thesis, (pp. 145–69). Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
FRANK, Robert H. 1993. “The Strategic Role of Emotions: Reconciling Over and Undersocialized
Accounts of Behavior.” Rationality and Society 5: 160–84.
GLASS, Jennifer, Vern L. BENGTSON, and Charlotte Chorn DUNHAM. 1986. “Attitude
Similarity in Three-Generation Families: Socialization, Status Inheritance, or Reciprocal
Influence?” American Sociological Review 51: 685–98.
GOVE, Walter. 1994. “WhyWe Do WhatWe Do: A Biopsychosocial Theory of Human
Motivation.” Social Forces 73: 363–94.
GRANOVETTER, Mark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78:
1360–80.
GREELEY, Andrew M., and Michael HOUT 1999. “Americans’ Increasing Belief in Life After
Death.” American Sociological Review 64: 813–35
HAGESTAD, Gunhild O. 1982. “Parent and Child: Generations in the Family.” In T. M. Field, A.
Huston, H. C. Quay, and G. E. Finley, eds. Review of Human Development (pp. 485–99).
New York: Wiley.
HALL, John R. 1978. The Ways Out: Utopian Communal Groups in an Age of Babylon. London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul.
HALL, John R. 1987. Gone From the Promised Land: Jonestown in American Cultural History.
New Brunswick,NJ: Transaction Books.
HALL, John R. 1988. “Jonestown and Bishop Hill: Continuities and Disjunctures in Religious
Conflict.”Communal Studies 8: 77–89.
HARRİSON, Michael, and Bernard LAZERWİTZ. 1982. “Do Denominations Matter?” American
Journal of Sociology 88: 356–77.
HECKATHORN, Douglas D. 1993. “Collective Action and Group Heterogeneity: Voluntary
Provision Versus Selective Incentives.” American Sociological Review 58: 329–50.
HECKATHORN, Douglas D. 1993. “Collective Action and Group Heterogeneity: Voluntary
Provision Versus Selective Incentives.” American Sociological Review 58: 329–50.
HİRSCHMAN, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
HOGE, Dean R., Benton JOHNSON, and Donald A. LUİDENS. 1994. Vanishing Boundaries: The
Religion of Mainline Protestant Baby Boomers. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox.
HUNSBERGER, Bruce E. 1985. “Parent-University Student Agreement on Religious and
Nonreligious Issues.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 24: 314–20.
294 Darren E. SHERKAT, Çev.: Özcan GÜNGÖR
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 8/3, Winter 2013
HUNTER, James D. 1983. American Evangelicalism: Conservative Religion and the Quandary
ofModernity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
HUNTER, James D. 1987. Evangelicalism: The Coming Generation. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
HUNTER, James D. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York: Basic
Books.
IANNACCONE, Laurence. . 1990. “Religious Practice: A Human Capital Approach.” Journal for
the Scientific Study of Religion 29: 297–314.
JOHNSON, Benton. 1997. “Formal Education vs. Religious Belief.” Journal for the Scientific
Study of Religion 36: 231–46.
JOHNSON, Robert Allan. 1980. Religious Assortative Marriage in the United States. New York:
Academic Press.
LAWLER, Edward J., Cecilia RİDGEWAY, and Barry MARKOVSKY. 1993. “Structural Social
Psychology and the Micro-Macro Problem.” Sociological Theory 11: 268–90.
LAZERWİTZ, Bernard, J. Alan WİNTER, Arnold DASHEFSKY, and Ephraim TABORY. 1998.
Jewish Choices: American Jewish Denominationalism. Albany, NY: State University of
New York Press.
LAZERWİTZ, Bernard. 1995a. “Denominational Retention and Switching among American
Jews.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 34: 499–506.
LAZERWİTZ, Bernard. 1995b. “Jewish-Christian Marriages and Conversions, 1971 and 1990.”
Sociology of Religion 56: 433–43.
LİEBMAN, Robert C., John R. SUTTON, and Robert WUTHNOW. 1988. “Exploring the Social
Sources of Denominationalism: Schisms in American Protestant Denominations, 1890–
1980.” American Sociological Review 53: 343–52.
MCCARTHY, John D., and Mayer N. ZALD. 1977. “Resource Mobilization and Social
Movements: A Partial Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 82: 1212–41.
MCCUTCHEON, Allan L. 1988. “Denominations and Religious Intermarriage: Trends Among
White Americans in the Twentieth Century.” Review of Religious Research 29: 213–27.
MCPHERSON, J. M., and Lynn SMİTH-LOVİN. 1987. “Homophily in Voluntary Organizations.”
American Sociological Review 52: 370–9.
MİLLER, Alan, and John HOFFMAN. 1995. “Risk and Religion: An Explanation of Gender
Differences in Religiosity.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 34: 63–75.
MİLLER, Alan, and Rodney STARK. 2002. “Gender and Religiousness.” American Journal of
Sociology 107: 1399–423.
NELSEN, Hart M., and R. H. PotVin. 1981. “Gender and Regional Differences in the Religiosity
of Protestant Adolescents.” Review of Religious Research 22: 278–85.
NELSEN, Hart M., and R. H. POTVİN. 1981. “Gender and Regional Differences in the Religiosity
of Protestant Adolescents.” Review of Religious Research 22: 278–85.
NEWCOMB, Theodore. 1943. Personality and Social Change: Attitude Formation in a Student
Community. New York. Holt.
Dini Sosyalleşme: Etki Kaynakları ve Araçların Etkileri 295
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 8/3, Winter 2013
PHİLLİPS, R. 1998. “Religious Market Share and Mormon Church Activity.” Sociology of
Religion 59: 117–30.
ROBERT Bellah, 1976. “New Religious Consciousness and the Crisis of Modernity.” In Chacles
Glock and Robert Bellah, eds., The New Religious Consciousness (pp. 332–52). Berkeley:
University of California Press.
ROBERT Bellah, 1976. “New Religious Consciousness and the Crisis of Modernity.” In Chacles
Glock and Robert Bellah, eds., The New Religious Consciousness (pp. 332–52). Berkeley:
University of California Press.
ROCHFORD, E. Burke. 1985. Hare Krishna in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University
Press.
ROOF Wade, Clark1993. A Generation of Seekers: The Spiritual Journeys of the Baby Boom
Generation. San Francisco:Harper & Row.
ROSSİ, Alice S., and Peter H. ROSSİ. 1990. Of Human Bonding: Parent-Child Relations Across
the Life Course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
SANDOMİRSKY, Sharon, and John WİLSON. 1990. “Processes of Disaffiliation: Religious
Mobility Among Men and Women.” Social Forces 68: 1211–29.
SEN, Amartya. 1973. “Behavior and the Concept of Preference.” Economica 40: 241–59.
SEN, Amartya. 1993. “Internal Consistency of Choice.” Econometrica 61: 495–521.
SHERKAT, Darren E. 1991a. “Leaving the Faith: Testing Sociological Theories of Religious
Switching Using Survival Models.” Social Science Research 20: 171–87.
SHERKAT, Darren E., and John WİLSON. 1995. “Preferences, Constraints, and Choices in
Religious Markets: An Examination of Religious Switching and Apostasy.” Social Forces
73: 993–1026.
SHERKAT, Darren E. 1991a. “Leaving the Faith: Testing Sociological Theories of Religious
Switching Using Survival Models.” Social Science Research 20: 171–87.
SHERKAT, Darren E. 1991b. Religious Socialization and the Family: An Examination of Religious
Influence in the Family over the Life Course. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Department
of Sociology. Duke University.
SHERKAT, Darren E. 1997. “Embedding Religious Choices: Integrating Preferences and Social
Constraints into Rational Choice Theories of Religious Behavior.” In Lawrence A. Young,
ed., Rational Choice Theory and Religion: Summary and Assessment (pp. 65–86). New
York: Routledge.
SHERKAT, Darren E. 1998. “Counterculture or Continuity? Examining Competing Influences on
Baby Boomers’ Religious Orientations and Participation.” Social Forces 76: 1087–1115.
SHERKAT, Darren E. 2001. “Tracking the Restructuring of American Religion.” Social Forces 79:
1459–93.
SHERKAT, Darren E., and Shannon A. CUNNİNGHAM. 1998. “Extending the Semi-Involuntary
Institution: Social Constraints and Regional Differences in Private Religious Consumption
Among African Americans.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 37: 383–96.
SHERKAT, Darren E., and T. Jean BLOCKER. 1997. “Explaining the Political and Personal
Consequences of Protest.” Social Forces. 75: 1049–76.
296 Darren E. SHERKAT, Çev.: Özcan GÜNGÖR
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 8/3, Winter 2013
SHERKAT, Darren, and Alfred DARNELL. 1999. “The Effect of Parents’ Fundamentalism on
Children’s Educational Attainment: Examining Differences by Gender and Children’s
Fundamentalism.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 38: 23–36.
SHERKAT, Darren, and Christopher ELLİSON. 1999. “Recent Developments and Current
Controversies in the Sociology of Religion.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 363–94.
SİGEL, Roberta S. 1989. “Conclusion: Adult Political Learning – A Lifelong Process.” In Roberta
S. Sigel, ed., Political Learning in Adulthood: A Sourcebook of Theory and Research (pp.
458–72).Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
SNOW, David A., E. Burke ROCHFORD, Steven K. WORDEN, and Robert D. BENFORD. 1986.
“Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American
Sociological Review 51: 464–81.
STARK Rodney, Roger FİNKE, and Laurence IANNACCONE. 1995. “Pluralism and Piety:
England and Wales, 1851.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 36: 431–44.
STARK, Rodney, and William Sims BAİNBRİDGE. 1980. “Networks of Faith: Interpersonal
Bonds and Recruitment to Cults and Sects.” American Journal of Sociology 85: 1376–85.
STARK, Rodney, and William Sims BAİNBRİDGE. 1985. The Future of Religion:
Secularization, Revival, and Cult Formation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
STARK, Rodney, and William Sims BAİNBRİDGE. 1987. A Theory of Religion. New Brunswick,
NJ: Rutgers University Press.
STİGLER, George G., and Gary S. BECKER. 1977. “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum.”
American Economic Review 67: 76–90.
STOLZENBERG, Ross M., Mary BLAİR-LOY, and Linda J. WAİTE. 1995. “Religious
Participation Over the Early Life Course: Age and Family Life Cycle Effects on Church
Membership.” American Sociological Review 60: 84–103.
STOLZENBERG, Ross M., Mary BLAİR-LOY, and Linda J. WAİTE. 1995. “Religious
Participation Over the Early Life Course: Age and Family Life Cycle Effects on Church
Membership.” American Sociological Review 60: 84–103.
SULLİNS, D. Paul. 1993. “Switching Close to Home: Volatility or Coherence in Protestant
Affiliation Patterns.” Social Forces 72: 399–419.
SUZİEDELİS, A., and R. H. POTVİN. 1981. “Sex Differences in Factors Affecting Religiousness
Among Catholic Adolescents.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 20: 38–51.
TAYLOR, Robert J. 1988. “Structural Determinants of Religious Participation Among Black
Americans.” Review of Religious Research 30: 114–25.
THOMAS, Darwin L., and Marie CORNWALL. 1990. “Religion and Family in the 1980’s:
Discovery and Development.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 52: 983–92.
WİLLİTS, Fern K., and Donald M. CRİDER. 1989. “Church Attendance and Traditional Religious
Beliefs in Adolescence and Young Adulthood: A Panel Study.” Review of Religious
Research 31: 68–81.
WİLSON, John, and Marc MUSİCK. 1997. “Who Cares? Toward an Integrated Theory of
Volunteer Work.” American Sociological Review 62: 694–713.
Dini Sosyalleşme: Etki Kaynakları ve Araçların Etkileri 297
Turkish Studies
International Periodical For the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 8/3, Winter 2013
WUTHNOW, Robert, and Glen Mellinger 1978. “The Religiosity of College Students: Stability
and Change over Years at University.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 17:159–
64.
WUTHNOW, Robert, and John Evans, eds. 2001. The Quiet Hand of God: The Public Role of
Mainline Protestants. Berkeley: University of California Press.
WUTHNOW, Robert. 1985. “Science and the Sacred.” In Phillip E. Hammond, ed., The Sacred in
a Secular Age (pp. 187–203). Berkeley: University of California Press.
WUTHNOW, Robert. 1987. Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis.
Berkeley: University of California Press.
WUTHNOW, Robert. 1988. The Restructuring of American Religion: Society and Faith
SinceWorldWar II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
WUTHNOW, Robert. 1989. The Struggle for America’s Soul: Evangelicals, Liberals, and
Secularism. Grand Rapids,MI: Eerdmans.
WUTHNOW, Robert. 1991. Acts of Compassion: Caring for Others and Helping Ourselves.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
WUTHNOW, Robert. 1993. The Future of Christianity. New York: Oxford University Press.
WUTHNOW, Robert. 1994. Sharing the Journey. New York: Free Press.
WUTHNOW, Robert. 1998. After Heaven: Spirituality in America Since the 1950s. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
WUTHNOW, Robert. 1999. Growing Up Religious: Christians and Jews and Their Journeys of
Faith. Boston: Beacon Press.
WUTHNOW, Robert, and John EVANS, eds. 2001. The Quiet Hand of God: The Public Role of
Mainline Protestants. Berkeley: University of California Press.
WUTHNOW, Robert, and Glen MELLİNGER 1978. “The Religiosity of College Students:
Stability and Change over Years at University.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
17:159–64.
ZALD, Mayer N. 2000. “Ideologically Structured Action: An Enlarged Agenda for Social
Movemen Research.” Mobilization 5: 1–16.
ZALD, Mayer N., and John D. MCCARTHY. 1987. Social Movements in an Organizational
Society: Collected Essays. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com