You are here

Home » Content

21. Yüzyılın Eşiğinde Fetal Cerrahi

Fetal Surgery at the Dawn of 21 th Century

Journal Name:

  • Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2004

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformations by improved fetal imaging techniques, as well as the possibility to correct those conditions which were potentially fatal or which might improve the prognosis of the child if they were corrected before birth promote interest in fetal surgery. Additionally it has been shown by experimental fetal surgery research that the wounds created in the ectoderm of a fetus in utero, heal clinically and histologically without scar formation. In this review, historical steps, indications, techniques, and complications of the fetal surgery were summarized.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Fetal görüntüleme tekniklerindeki gelişmeler sonucunda doğum öncesi dönemde fetal malformasyonların tanısının konulabilmesi, diğer taraftan ölüm riski taşıyan ya da doğum öncesi düzeltilmesi halinde prognozun olumlu yönde etkileneceği patolojik durumların intrauterin dönemde onarımının yapılabilme olasılığı günümüzde fetal cerrahi üzerine ilgiyi artırmıştır. Ayrıca deneysel fetal cerrahi araştırmalarda, intrauterin dönemde fetusun ektoderminde oluşturulan yaranın, klinik ve histolojik olarak skar oluşmadan iyileştiği gösterilmiştir. Böylelikle yara iyileşmesi alanında da önemli bilgiler elde edilmiştir. Bu makalede, fetal cerrahinin gelişimi, endikasyonları, kullanılan teknikler ve komplikasyonlar literatür ışığında anlatılmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-21.yuzyilin-esiginde-fetal-cerrahi.pdf
  • 1
53-56
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Rosenkranz JG, Simon RC, and Carisle JH. Fetal surgery in
the pig with a review of other mammalian fetal techniques. J
Pediatr Surg 1968;3:392-7.
2. Jackson BT, and Egdahl RH. The performance of complex
fetal operations in utero without amniotic fluid loss or other
disturbances of the fetal-maternal relationships. Surgery
1960;48:564-70.
3. Freda VJ, Adamson K Jr. Exchange transfusion in utero.
Report of a case. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1964;89:817-21.
4. Crombleholme TM, D’Alton M, Cendron M, et al. Prenatal
diagnosis and the pediatric surgeon : the impact of prenatal
consultation on perinatal management. J Pediatr Surg
1996;31:156-63.
5. Harrison MR, Filly RA, Parer JRT, et al. Management of the
fetus with a urinary tract malformation. JAMA 1981;246:635-
9.
6. Harrison MR, Ross NA, Noall R, et al. Correction of
congenital hydronephrosis in utero. I. The model: fetal
urethral obstruction produces hydronephrosis and pulmonary
hypoplasia in fetal lambs. J Pediatr Surg 1983;18:247-56.
7. Harrison MR, and Adzick NS. What's new in general surgery.
The fetus as a patient. Surgical Considerations Ann Surg
1991;213:279-81.
8. Adzick NS, Outwater KM, Harrison MR, et al. Correction of
congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero. An early gestational
fetal lamb model for pulmonary vascular morphometric
analysis. J Pediatr Surg 1985;20:673-80.
9. Harrison MR, Langer JC, Adzick NS, et al. Correction of
congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero. Initial clinical
experience. J Pediatr Surg 1990;25:47-57.
10. Adzick NS, Harrison MR, Glick PL, et al. Fetal cystic
adenotamoid malformation: prenatal diagnosis and natural
history. J Pediatr Surg 1985;20:483-8.
11. Langer JC, Harrison MR, Schmidt KG, et al. Fetal hydrops
and demise from sacrococcygeal teraotoma: rationale for fetal
surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:1145-50.
12. Harrison MR, Filly RA, Golbus MS, et al. Fetal treatment. N
Engl J Med 1982;307:1651-2.
13. Adzick NS, Harrison MR, Glick PI, et al. Comparison of fetal,
newborn and adult wound healing by histologic, enzymehistochemical, and hydroxyproline determination. J Pediatr
Surg 1985;20:315-9.
14. Lorenz HP, Longaker MT, Perkacha LA, et al. Scarless wound
repair: a human fetal skin model. Development 1992;114:253-
9.
15. Goss AN. Intrauterine healing of fetal rat oral mucosal, skin
and cartilage wounds. J Oral Pathol 1977;6:35-8.
16. Viljanto J, Thomasson B, Pikkarainen J, et al. Foetal
connective tissue regeneration. Acta Chir Scand 1975;141:85-
9.
17. Krummel TM, Nelson JM, Diegelmann RF, etal. Fetal
response to injury in the rabbit. J Pediatr Surg 1987;22:640-4.
18. Burrington JD. Wound healing in the fetal lamb. J Pediatr
Surg 1971;6:523-8.
19. Sopher D. A study of wound healing in the foetal tissues of
the cynomolgus monkey. Lab Anim Handbook 1975;6:327-
35.
20. Hallock GG, Rice DC, and McClure HM. In utero lip repair in
the rhesus monkey: An update. Plast Reconstr Surg
1987;80:855-8.
21. Adzick NS, and Harrison MR. Fetal surgical therapy. Lancet
1994;343:897-902.
22. Dado DV, Kernahan DA, and Gianopoulous JG. Intrauterine
repair of cleft lip: What’s involved? (Discussion) Plast
Reconstr Surg 1990;85:461-7.
23. Longaker MT, Dodson TB, Leonard B, Kaban DMD. A rabbit
model for fetal cleft cleft repair J Oral Maxillofac Surg
1990;48:714-9. G.Y. Özgenel
56
24. Harling TR, Stelnicki EJ, Hedrick MH, Longaker MT. In
utero models of craniofacial surgery. World J Surg
2003;27:108-16.
25. Crombleholme TM, Dirkes K, Whitney TM, et al. Amniotic
band syndrome in fetal lambs. I. Fetoscopic release and
morphometric outcome. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:974-8.
26. Lorenz HP, and Longaker MT. In utero surgery for cleft
lip/palate: minimizing the “Ripple effect” of scarring. J
Craniofac Surg 2003;14:504-11.
27. Weinzweig J, Panter KE, Patalooni M, et al. The fetal cleft
palate: I. Characterization of a congenital model. Plast
Reconstr Surg 1999; 103:419-28.
28. Weinzweig J, Sullivan P, Panter KE, et al. The fetal cleft
palate: II. Scarless healing after in utero repair of a congenital
model. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1356-64.
29. Stelnicki EJ, Hoffman W, Foster R, et al. The in utero repair
of Tessier number 7 lateral facial clefts created by amniotic
band-like compression. J Craniofac Surg 1998;9:557-62.
30. Stelnicki EJ, Vanderwall K, Hoffman WY, et al. A new in
utero sheep model for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis.
Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101:278-86.
31. Stelnicki EJ, Vanderwall K, Harrison MR, et al. The in utero
correction of unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. Plast
Reconstr Surg 1998;101:287-96.
32. Stelnicki EJ, Lee S, Hoffman W, et al. A long-term,
controlled-outcome analysis of in utero versus neonatal cleft
lip repair using an ovine model. Plast Reconstr Surg
1999;104:607-15.
33. Longaker MT, Whitby DJ, Ferguson MW, et al. Studies in
fetal wound healing: Early deposition of fibronectin
distinguishes fetal from adult wound healing. J Pediatr
Surg1989;24:799-805.
34. Somasundaram K, Prathrap K. Intrauterine healing of skin
wounds in rabbit foetus. J Pathol 1970;100:81-6.
35. Dostal GH, Gamelli RL, et al. Fetal wound healing. Gynecol
Obstet 1993 ;176 :299-306.
36. Longaker MT, Golbus MS, Filly RA, et al. maternal outcome
after open fetal surgery: a review of the first 17 human cases.
JAMA 1991;265:737-41.
37. Adzick NS, Harrison MR, Anderson JV, et al. Fetal surgery in
the primate. III. Maternal outcome after fetal surgery. J Pediatr Surg 1986;21:477-80.
38. Harrison MR, Anderson JR, Rosen M, et al. Fetal surgery in
the primate. I. Anesthetic, surgical, and tocolytic management
to maximize the fetal-neonatal survival. J Peiatr Surg
1982;17:115-22.
39. Estes JM, MacGillivray TE, Hadrick MH, et al. Fetoscopic
surgery for the treatment of congenital anomalies. J Pediatr
Surg 1992;27:950-54.
40. Estes JM, Whitby DJ, Lorenz HP, et al. Endoscopic creation
and repair of fetal cleft lip. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;90:743-
9.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com