You are here

İntrauterin Yara İyileşmesinin Biyolojisi

The Biology of Intrauterine Wound Healing

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Cutaneous scarring may be defined as the functional and structural disturbance of the normal skin architecture as an end product of the wound healing process. The experimental studies which show that fetal wounds created heal without scar formation in certain animal models have created a rapidly growing field of surgical research regarding the biology of fetal healing and the manipulation of scar formation in adult models. In this paper, it was aimed to review the characteristics of intrauterine wound healing in order to light the way for the new investigations on this subject.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Yara iyileşmesinin bir sonucu olan kutanöz skar oluşumu, normal deri yapısındaki fonksiyonel ve yapısal bir bozukluk olarak tanımlanabilir. Belli hayvan modellerinde fetusun ektoderminde oluşturulan yaraların skar oluşmadan iyileştiğini gösteren deneysel çalışmalar, fetal iyileşmenin biyolojisi ve erişkin modelinde skar oluşumunun manipülasyonu konusu ile ilgili hızla gelişen bir cerrahi araştırma alanı yaratmıştır. Bu konuda ki yapılacak olan yeni çalışmalara ışık tutması açısından bu makalede, intrauterin yara iyileşmesinin özelliklerinin anlatılması amaçlanmıştır.
103-106

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Harrison MR, Filly RA, Golbus MS, et al. Fetal treatment. N
Engl J Med 1982;307:1651-2.
2. Lorenz HP, Longaker MT, Perkacha LA, et al. Scarless wound
repair: a human fetal skin model. Development 1992;114:253-
9.
3. Goss AN. Intrauterine healing of fetal rat oral mucosal, skin
and cartilage wounds. J Oral Pathol 1977;6:35-8.
4. Viljanto J, Thomasson B, Pikkarainen J, et al. Foetal
connective tissue regeneration. Acta Chir Scand 1975;141:85-
9.
5. Krummel TM, Nelson JM, Diegelmann RF, et al. Fetal
response to injury in the rabbit. J Pediatr Surg 1987;22:640-4.
6. Burrington JD. Wound healing in the fetal lamb. J Pediatr
Surg 1971;6:523-8.
7. Sopher D. A study of wound healing in the foetal tissues of
the cynomolgus monkey. Lab Anim Handbook 1975;6:327-
35.
8. Hallock GG, Rice DC, and McClure HM. In utero lip repair in
the rhesus monkey: An update. Plast Reconstr Surg
1987;80:855-8.
9. Mathes SJ, Abouljord M: Wound healing. In Davis JH,(ed).
Clinical surgery. St Louis: Mosby;1987.pp.
10. Cohen IK, and Diegelmann RF. Wound healing in cosmetic
surgery: An overview. In R. Ross (Ed.), Problems in Aesthetic
Surgery: Biological causes and clinical solutions. St. Louis:
Mosby; 1986. pp.
11. Longaker MT, and Adzick NS. The biology of fetal wound
healing: A review. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:788-98.
12. Adzick NS, Harrison MR, Glick PI, et al. Comparison of fetal,
newborn and adult wound healing by histologic, enzymehistochemical,
and hydroxyproline determination. J Pediatr
Surg 1985;20:315-9.
13. Ledbetter SM, Morykwas MJ, et al. The effects of total and
partial amniotic fluid exclusion on excisional fetal rabbit
wounds. Ann Plast Surg 1991;27:139-43.
14. Longaker MT, Whitby DJ, Ferguson JWM, et al. Adult skin
wounds in the fetal environment heal with scar formation.
Ann Surg 1994;219:65-72.
15. Çek DI, Özer K, Perk C ve ark. Histologic changes in capsule
formation around silicone implants after a single dose
injection of amniotic fluid. Eur J Plast Surg 1992;15:289-91.
16. Özgenel GY, Şamlı B, Özcan M. Effects of human amniotic
fluid on peritendinous adhesion formation and tendon healing
after flexor tendon surgery in rabbits. J Hand Surg
2001;26:332-9.
G. Y. Özgenel
106
17. Özgenel GY, and Filiz G. Effects of human amniotic fluid on
peripheral nerve scarring and regeneration in rats. J Neurosurg
2003;98:371-7.
18. Harrison MR, Langer JC, Adzick NS, et al. Correction of
congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero. Initial clinical
experience. J Pediatr Surg 1990;25:47-57.
19. Rowsell AR. The intrauterine healing of foetal muscle
wounds: Experimental study in the rat. Br J Plast Surg
1984;37:635-42.
20. Hegard D, and Paulsson M. Structure and metabolism of
proteoglycans. In K.A. Piez and A. H. Reddi (Eds.),
Extracellular matrix biochemistry. New York: Elsevier, 1984.
Pp. 277-280.
21. Nimni ME, and Harkness RD. Molecular structure and
functions of collagen. In M.E. Nimni (Ed.), Collagen, Vol. 1:
Biochemistry. Boca Raton, Fla.: CRC Press, 1988. Pp. 43-45
22. Longaker MT, Chiu ES, Adzick SN, et al. Studies in fetal
wound healing. V. A prolonged presence of hyaluronic acid
characterizes fetal wound fluid. Ann Surg 1991,213:292-6.
23. Longaker MT, Hall JL, Stair SE, et al. Studies in fetal wound
healing. VII. Fetal wound healing may be modulated by
hyaluronic acid stimulating activity in amniotic fluid. J Pediatr
Surg 1990;25:430-3.
24. Longaker MT, Whitby DJ, Ferguson MW, et al. Studies in
fetal wound healing: Early deposition of fibronectin
distinguishes fetal from adult wound healing. J Pediatr Surg
1989;24:799-805.
25. Merkel JR, DiPaolo BR, Hallock GG, and Rice DC. Type I
and type III collagen content of healing wounds in fetal and
adult rats. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med 1988,187:493-7.
26. Mast BA, Haynes JH, Krummel TM, et al. In vivo degradation
of fetal wound hyaluronic acid results in increased
fibroplasias, collagen deposition, and neovascularization.
1992,89:503-7.
27. Estes JM, Adzick SN, Harrison MR, et al. Hyaluronate
metabolism undergoes an ontogenic transition during fetal
development: Implications for scar-free wound healing. J Pediatr
Surg 1993,28:1227-31.
28. Krummel TM, Michna AB, Thomas BL, et al. Transforming
growth factor beta induces fibrosis in a fetal wound model. J
Pediatr Surg 1988;23:647-52.
29. Nath KR, LaRegina M, Markham H, et al. The expression of
transforming growth factor type beta in fetal and adult rabbit
skin wounds. J Pediatr Surg 1994,29:418-21.
30. Somasundaram K, Prathrap K. Intrauterine healing of skin
wounds in rabbit foetus. J Pathol 1970;100:81-6.
31. Somasundaram K, Prathrap K. The effect of exclusion of
amniotic fluid on intrauterine healing of skin in rabbit
foetuses. J Pathol 1972;107:127-30.
32. Krummel TM, Ehrlich HP, Nelson JM, et al. Fetal wounds do
not contract in utero. Surg Forum 1989,40:613-4.
33. Çek İşçen D. Intrauterin yara iyileşmesinin özellikleri ve
fetusa yapılan cerrahi girişimler. Klinik Gelişim 5 1992:1868-
70.
34. Dado DV, Kernahan DA, and Gianopoulous JG. Intrauterine
repair of cleft lip: What’s involved? (Discussion) Plast
Reconstr Surg 1990;85:461-7.
35. Longaker MT, Dodson TB, Leonard B, Kaban DMD. A rabbit
model for fetal cleft cleft repair J Oral Maxillofac Surg
1990;48:714-9.
36. Harling TR, Stelnicki EJ, Hedrick MH, Longaker MT. In
utero models of craniofacial surgery. World J Surg
2003;27:108-16.
37. Crombleholme TM, Dirkes K, Whitney TM, et al. Amniotic
band syndrome in fetal lambs. I. Fetoscopic release and
morphometric outcome. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:974-8.
38. Lorenz HP, and Longaker MT. In utero surgery for cleft
lip/palate: minimizing the “Ripple effect” of scarring.J
Craniofac Surg 2003;14:504-11.
39. Dostal GH, Gamelli RL, et al. Fetal wound healing. Gynecol
Obstet 1993;176:299-306.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com