You are here

Home » Content

Broiler Tavuk larda Yeme İlave Edilen Saccharomyces cerevisiae ve Fitaz’ın Büyüme Performansı ve Plazma Biyokimyasal Parametreleri Üzerine Etkileri

The Effects of Supplemental Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Phytase on Growth Performances and Plasma Biochemical Parameters of Broiler Chickens

Journal Name:

  • Uludag University Journal of The Faculty of Veterinary Medicine

Publication Year:

  • 2015

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Saccharomyces cerevisiae and phytase can be used as a feed supplement in combination or alone for broiler feeding. An experiment was performed to study the effect of supplemental different ratio S. cerevisiae and phytase combination on growth performances, plasma biochemical parameters and plasma enzyme activities of broiler chickens. Animal were feed ad libitum through the study. Sixty hundred 1 day-old broiler chicks were randomly selected and distributed into eight groups as control (C); phytase (P) (added 200 g Pyhase to 1000 kg of diet); S. cerevisiae (Y1) (added 0.1% S. cerevisiae of the diet); Y1+P (combination of group Y1 and P); S. cerevisiae (Y2) (added 0.2% S. cerevisiae of the diet); Y2+P (Combination of Y2 and P); Y4 (added 0.4% S. cerevisiae of the diet); Y4+P (Combination of Y4 and P) respectively. At the end of the study, blood samples were collected from 15 randomly selected broiler chickens from each group through the brachial vein on the 42nd day of the experiment. Plasma were separated and used for measurement of plasma biochemical parameters and enzyme activities. S.cerevisiae alone and combination of Phytase and S. cerevisiae increased body weight and body weight gain of broiler, especially in 6th week, except in group Y4. Although, the broiler chickens supple-mented with just phytase or/and S. cerevisiae and their combination had lower plasma triglyceride, total choles-terol, LDL-cholesterol, glucose, calcium and GGT enzyme activity , they had higher HDL-cholesterol, phospho-rus and ALT enzyme. Moreover, supplementation with just phytase or/and S. cerevisiae and their combination did not change the hematocrit, plasma total protein and AST enzyme levels of the broiler chickens. These results demonstrated that phytase and S. cerevisiae alone or/and their combination improved growth performance and body weight gain of the broiler chickens. So, S.cerevisiae and phytase combination may be used as an growth enhancer. However, more studies would be necessary to obtain the effects of supplementing yeast and phytase combination on growth.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Saccharomyces cerevisiae ve fitaz ayrı ayrı olarak broiler tavuklarda yem katkısı amacıyla kullanılmakta-dır. Bu araştırma, farklı oranlarda S. cerevisiae’nin ve fitaz kombinasyonunun broiler tavuklarda büyüme per-formansı, plazma biyokimyasal parametreleri ve plazma enzim aktiviteleri üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmek için yapıldı. Çalışma boyunca hayvanlar ad libitum beslendi. 1 günlük yaşta 600 adet broiler tavuk rastgele se-çildi ve 8 gruba sırasıyla şu şekilde ayrıldı: Kontrol (C); Fitaz (P) (200 g Fitaz 1000 kg yeme ilave edildi); S. cerevisiae (Y1) (% 0,1 oranında S. cerevisiae yeme ilave edildi); Y1+P (grup Y1 ve P’nin kombinasyonu); Y2 (% 0,2 oranında S. cerevisiae yeme ilave edildi); Y2+P (grup Y2 ve P’nin kombinasyonu); Y4 (% 0,4 oranında S. cerevisiae yeme ilave edildi); Y4+P (grup Y4 ve P’nin kombinasyonu). Çalışmanın sonlandırıldığı 42. günde, her gruptan rastgele seçilen 15 adet hayvanın brahial veninden kan örnekleri alındı. Kan örneklerinin plazması ayrıldı ve biyokimyasal parametreler ve enzim aktivitelerinin ölçülmesi için kullanıldı. S. cerevisiae, tek başına ve S.cerevisiae ve fitaz kombinasyonları, Y4 grubu hariç, özellikle 6. haftada tavuklarda canlı ağırlık ve canlı ağırlık kazanımını arttırdı. Sadece fitaz ve/veya S. cerevisiae ve kombinasyonlarının veril-diği tavuklarda plazma trigliserid, total kolesterol, LDL_kolesterol, glukoz, kalsiyum ve GGT enzimi azalırken, hayvanlarda yüksek düzeyde HDL-kolesterol, fosfor ve ALT enzimi tespit edildi. Diğer taraftan, tavuklarda sadece fitaz ve/veya S. cerevisiae ve kombinasyonlarının yem katkısı olarak kullanılması, hematokrit, plazma protein ve AST enzim değerlerini değiştirmedi. Sonuçlar fitaz ve S. cerevisiae’nın yalnız ve/veya kombinasyon-larının yem katkısı olarak kullanılmasının büyüme performansı ve canlı ağırlık kazanımını arttırdığını göster-mektedir. Böylece, S.cerevisiae ve fitaz kombinasyonları büyümeyi arttırıcı olarak kullanılabilir. Ancak, maya ve fitaz kombinasyonlarının büyümedeki etkisinin ortaya konması için daha fazla çalışmanın yapılması gerek-mektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-broiler-tavuk-larda-yeme-ilave-edilen-saccharomyces-cerevisiae-fitazin-buyume-performansi-plazma-biyokimyasal-parametreleri-uzerine-etkileri.pdf
  • 1-2
15
23
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Abdelrahman, M.M., 2013. Effects of feeding dry fat and yeast culture on broiler chicken perfor-mance. Turk J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 37, 31–37.
2. Akhavan-Salamat, H., Ghasemi, H.A., Khaltaba-ti-Farahani, A.H., Kazemi-Bonchenari, M., 2011. The effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on per-formance and nutrients digestibility in broilers fed with diet containing different levels of phosphorus. Afr. J. Biotechnology, 10, 7526–7533.
3. Aluwong, T., Hassan, B.F., Raji, M.A, , Kawu, M.U, Dzenda, T, Ayo J.O., 2013. Effect of Diffe-rent Levels of Supplemental Yeast on Perfor-mance Indices and Serum Biochemistry of Broi-ler Chickens. African Journal of Biotechnology, 12, 5480–5485.
4. Bekatorou, A., Psarianos, C., Koutinas, A.A., 2006. "Production of Food Grade Yeasts". Food Technology Biotechnology, 44, 407–415.
5. Biehl, R.R., Baker, D.H., Deluca, H.F., 1995. 1α-hydroxylated cholecalciferol compounds act ad-ditively with microbial phytase to improve phosphorus, zinc and manganese utilization in chicks fed soy-based diets. J. Nutr., 125, 2407–2416.
6. Bradley, G.L., Savage, T.F., 1958. The effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on turkey poult per-formance and the retention of gross energy and selected minerals. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 55, 1–7.
7. Brake, J., 1991. Lack of effect of all live yeast culture on broiler, breeders and progeny Perfor-mance. Poult. Sci., 70, 1037–1039.
8. Cowieson, A.J., Wilcock, P., Bedford, M.R., 2011. Super-dosing effects of phytase in poultry and other monogastrics. World's Poultry Science Journal, 67, 225–236.
9. Dawson, B., Trapp, R.G., 2004. Basic&Clinical Biostatistics, In. Lange Medical Books/McGraw International Editions, 3rd ed., New York, pp, 308-315.
10.Derebasi, E., Demir, E., 2004. Effects of the supplementation of probiotic , prebiotic and or-ganic acid in triticale and soybean meal based broiler diets. XXII Worlds Poultry Congress, Is-tanbul, Turkey.
11.Dowdy, S., Wearden, S., 1981. Statistics for Research. John Wiley & Sons Press-New York, pp, 262–274.
12. Eckles, C.H., Williams, V.M., 1924. Yeast as a supplementary feed for lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci., 8, 89–93.
13. Erdman, J.W., 1989. Phytic acid interactions with divalent cations in Foods and Gastrointestinal tract. In. Dintizis, F.R., Laszlo, J.A. (Eds.), Mine-
22
ral absorption in monogastric gastrointestinal tract. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 161–170.
14.Erkek, R., Unlu, H.B., 2003. Fitaz Enziminin Etlik Piliçlerin Beslenmesinde Kullanımı, Hay-vansal Üretim, 44, 10–19.
15. El-Arab, A.E., Foheid, S., El-Said, M., 2009. Effect of yeast and botanical β-glucan on serum lipid profile and cecum probiotic bacteria using rats fed cholesterol diet. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci., 59, 169–174.
16. Fuller, R., 1977. The importance of lactobacilli in maintaining normal microbial balance in the crop. British Poultry Sci., 18,18–94.
17.Hassanein, M.S., Soliman, N.K., 2010. Effect of Probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) Adding to Diets on Intestinal Microflora and Performance of Hy-Line Layers Hens. Journal of American Sci., 6, 159–169.
18.Hayat, J., Savage, T.F., Mirosh, L.W., 1993. The reproductive performance of two genetically dis-tinct lines of medium white hens when fed bree-der diets with and without a yeast culture contai-ning Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 43,291–301.
19.Hiss, S., Sauerwein, H., 2003. Influence of die-tary ss-glucan on growth performance, lymp-hocyte proliferation, specific immune response and haptoglobin plasma concentrations in pigs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 87, 2–11.
20. Johnston, S.L., 2000. The effect of phytase on nutrient availability in diets for swine and po-ultry. Ph,D. Thesis, Louisiana State Univ, Baton Rouge.
21. Johnston, S.L., Williams, S.B., Southern, L.L., Bidner, T.D., Bunting, L.D., Matthews, J.O., Ol-cott, B.M., 2004. Effect of phytase addition and dietary calcium and phosphorus levels on plasma metabolites and ileal and total-tract nutrient di-gestibility in pigs. J. Anim. Sci., 82,705–714.
22.Kabir, S.M.L., 2009. The Role of Probiotics in Poultry. Industry Int. J. Mol. Sci., 10, 3531– 3546.
23.Kim, S.H., Yu, D.J., Park, S.Y., Lee, S.J., Ryu, K.S., 2002. Effects of single or mixed feeding of lactobacillus and yeast on performance, nutrient digestibility intestinal microflora, and fecal NH3 gas emission in laying hens. Korean Journal of Poultry Sci., 29, 225–231.
24.Levic, J., Djuragic, O., Sredanovic, S., 2006. Phytase as a factor of improving broilers growth performance and environmental protection. Arc-hiva Zootechnica, 9, 95-100.
25.Liu, N., Ru, Y., Wang, J., Xu, T., 2010. Effect of dietary sodium phytate and microbial phytase on the lipase activity and lipid metabolism of broiler chickens. Br. J. Nutr., 103, 862–8.
26.Mannan, F., Ahmed, H.H., Estefan, S.F., Sharaf, H.A., Eskander, E.F., 2005. Saccharomyces ce-revisiae intervention for relieving flutamide-induced hepatoxicity in male rats. Pharmazie, 60, 689–695.
27.Monika, B.T., Roman, S., Anna, P., 2012. The level of major proteins and minerals in the blood serum of chickens fed diets with pure cellulose. Folio biologica (Krakow), 60, 65–70.
28.National Research Council – NRC, 1994. Nutri-ent Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. Ed., Natio-nal Acad., Press, Washington-DC.
29.Nilson, A., Peralta, J.M.F., Miazzo, R.D., 2004. Use of brewer yeast (S,cerevisiae) to replace part of the vitamin mineral premix in finisher broiler diets. XXII World Poultry Congress, Istanbul, Turkey
30.Onifade, A.A., Odunsi, A.A., Babatunde, G.M., Olorede, B.R., Muma, E., 1999. Comparison of the supplemental effects of Saccharomyces cere-visiae and antibiotics in low-protein and high fib-re diets fed to broiler chickens. Arch. Tierernahr, 52, 29–39.
31.Onwurah, F.B., Amaefule, K.U., Ahamefule, F.O., 2014. Effect of Baker’s Yeast (Saccha-romycescerevisiae) Inclusion in Feed and in DrinkingWater on Performance of Broiler Birds. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 4, 144-151.
32.Onyango, E.M., Bedford, M.R., Adeola, O., 2004. The yeast production system in which Escherichia coli phytase is expressed may affect growth performance, bone ash, and nutrient use in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci., 83, 421–427.
33.Ozsoy, B., Yalcin, S., 2011. The effects of die-tary supplementation of yeast culture on perfor-mance, blood parameters and immune system in broiler turkeys. J. Ankara Univ. Vet. Fac., 58, 117–122.
34. Paryad, A., Mahmoudi, M., 2008. Effect of diffe-rent levels of supplemental yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on performance, blood constituents and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks. Afri-can Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(12), 835–842.
35. Pirgozliev, V., Karadas, F., Pappas, A., Acamo-vic, T., Bedford, M.R., 2010. The effect on per-formance, energy metabolism and hepatic carote-noid content when phytase supplemented diets were fed to broiler chickens. Research in Veteri-nary Sci., 89, 203–205.
36. Pouraziz, S., Aghdam Shahryar, H., Chekani-Azar, S., 2013. Effects of Dietary Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Butyric Acid Glycerides on Per-formance and Serum Lipid Level of Broiler Chickens. J. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fac., 19, 903-907.
23
37.Rojas, S.W., Scott, M.L., 1969. Factors affectingthe nutritive value of cottonseed meal as a proteinsource in chick diets. Poult. Sci., 48, 819–835.
38.Rozeboom, D.W., Shaw, D.T., Tempelman, R.J.,Miguel, J.C., Pettigrew, J.E., Connolly, A., 2005.Effects of mannan oligosaccharide and an anti-microbial product in nursery diets on performan-ce of pigs reared on three different farms. J.Anim. Sci., 83, 2637–2644.
39. Saied, J.M., Al-Jabary, Q.H., Thalij, K.M., 2011.Effect of Dietary Supplement Yeast Culture onProduction Performance and Hematological Pa-rameters in Broiler Chicks. International Journalof Poultry Science, 10, 376–380.
40. Santin, E., Mariorka, A., Macari, M., Grecco, M.,Sanchez, J.C., 2001. Performance and intestinalmucosa development in broiler chickens fed ra-tion containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cellwall. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 10, 236–244.
41. Scott, T.A., 2002. Evaluation of lighting prog-rams, diet density, and short-term use of mash asto 35 days of age. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 82, 375–383.
42. Sebastian, S., Touchburn, S.P., Chavez, E.R.,Lague, P.C., 1996a. The effects of supplementalmicrobial phytase on the performance and utiliza-tion of dietary calcium, phosphorus, copper andzinc in broiler chickens fed corn-soyabean diets.Poultry Sci., 75, 729–736
43. Sebastian, S., Touchburn, S.P., Chavez, E.R.,Lague, P.C. (1996b). Efficacy of supplementalmicrobial phytase at different dietary calcium le-vels on growth performance and mineral utiliza-tion of broiler chickens. Poultry Sci., 75, 1516–1523.
44. Selle, P.H., Ravindran, V., Partridge, G.G., 2009.Beneficial effects of xylanase and/or phytase inc-lusions on ileal amino acid digestibility, energyutilisation, mineral retention and growth perfor-mance in wheat-based broiler diets. Anim. FeedSci. Technol., 153, 303–313.
45. Shareef, A.M., Al-Dabbagh, A.A.S., 2009. Effectof probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) on per-formance of broiler chicks. Iraqi Journal of Vete-rinary Sci., 1, 23–29.
46. Shrivastava, A.K., Jha, R.R., 2010. Effects OfDifferent Chemical Composition And ProbioticOn The Haematobiochemical Profile Of Rabbit.EJEAFChe., 9, 1507–1513.
47. Simons, P.C.M, Versteegh, H.A.J, Jongbloed,A.W., Kemme, P.A., Slump, P., Bos, K.D., Wol-ters, M.G.E., Beudeker, R.F., Verschooor G.J.,
1990. Improvement of phosphorus availability by microbial phytase in broilers and pigs. British Journal of Nutr., 64, 525–540.
48. Simpson, C.J., Wise, A., 1990. Binding of zincand calcium to inositol phosphates (phytate) invitro. Brit. J. Nutr., 64, 225–232.
49. Singh, P.K., Khatta, V.K., 2002. Phytase supple-mentation for economic and eco-friendly broilerproduction. Journal of Eco- Physiology, 5,117–121.
50. Singh, P.K., Khatta, V.K., 2003a. Effect of phy-tase supplementation on the broiler production.Poultry Planner, 4, 13–14.
51. Singh, P.K., Khatta, V.K., 2003b. Effect of phy-tase supplementation on the performance of broi-ler chickens fed wheat based diets. Indian Jour-nal of Animal Nutrition, 20, 57–62.
52. SPSS. SPSS software package for Windows.Version 17,0, Chicago.
53.Thayer, R.H., Burkitt, R.F., Morrison, R.D.,Murray, E.E., 1978. Efficiency of utilization ofdietary phosphorus by Caged turkey breeder hensfed rations supplemented with live yeast culture.Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment StationStillwate, 173–181.
54.Thompson, L.U., 1986. Phytic acid, chemistry,nutritional effect and removal. Proc. FourthWorld Congress of Animal Feeding, InternationalPermanent Committee of the World Congresseson Animal Feeding, Madrid, 319–30.
55. Thompson, L.U., 1993. Potential health benefitsand problems associated with antinutrients in fo-ods. Food Research International, 26, 131–149.
56. Thongsong, B., Kalandakanond-Thongsong, S.,Chavananikul, V., 2008. Effects of the additionof probiotic containing both bacteria and yeast oran antibiotic on performance parameters, morta-lity rate and antibiotic residue in broilers. TheThai J. Vet. Med., 38, 17–26.
57.Veide, J., Andlid, T., 2006. Improved extracellu-lar phytase activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeby modifications in the PHO system. Int. J. FoodMicrobiol., 15; 108, 60–7.
58. Yalcin, S., Yalçın, S., Uzunoğlu, K., Duyum,H.M., Eltan, O., 2012. Effects of dietary yeastautolysate (Sachaccaromyces cerevisiae) andBlack cumin seed (Nigella sativa L,) on perfor-mance, egg traits, some blood characteristics andantibody production of laying hens. Livest. Sci.,145, 13–20.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com