You are here

LEWIS MODELİNİN ZAYIF YÖNLERİ V E SINIRLAYICILARI

WEAKNESS and LIMITATIONS OF LEWIS MODEL

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The distinction of Lewis from other economists is that he regards surplus labour as marginal productivity of labour is negligible, zero, or even negative with respect to human beings rather man-hours. Lewis model has challenged theoretical and empirical evidences from South eastern Asia and Latin America by many economists. In particular, Ted Schultz heavily criticized Lewis model by providing empirical results from India in which Lewis based his model on the over-populated in Indian rural areas. Surplus labour is the central element in Lewis model which is based on a "capitalist" and a "subsistence" sector which are called later as "a modern" and "a traditional" sector in his revisited work of dual economy in 1979. This study is based on a critical literature review in order to explain the limitation of the Lewis model.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Lewis'i diğer ekonomistlerden ayıran şey onun artık emeği, marjinal verimliliği çalışma saatlerinden ziyade işgücü bakımından sıfır ve hatta negatif olarak kabul etmesidir. Lewis modeli Asya ve Latin Amerika'da ki birçok iktisatçı tarafından teorik ve ampirik olarak desteklenmemiştir. Bilhassa, Lewis'in modelini dayandırdığı Hindistan kırsal alanında aşırı nüfusun olduğu Hindistan'dan gözlemsel sonuçlar sağlayarak Lewis'i cok ağır bir şekilde eleştirmiştir. İşgücü fazlası ilk olarak "kapitalist" ve "geçimlik" daha sonra 1979 yılında açıklık getirdiği yeni çalışmasında ise "modern" ve "geleneksel" sektöre dayalı olan Lewis modelindeki merkezi noktayı oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışma Lewis modelinin zayıf yönleri ve sınırlayıcı hususlarını açıklayan detaylı kritik bir literatür çalışmasına dayanmaktadır.
175
182

REFERENCES

References: 

Fei, J. C. H. and Gustav R. (1964). Development of the Labor Surplus Economy: Theory and Policy, Homewood, Illinois, Richard A. Irwin, Inc.
Fields, G. S. (1975). "Rural-Urban Migration, Urban Unemployment and Underemployment and Job Search Activity in LDCs." Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 165-88.
Findlay, R. (1980). On W. Arthur Lewis' Contributions to Economics, Columbia University, New York, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Vol:82, No:l, pp. 62-79.
Fitzgerald, V. (2004). The Lewis Model In Practice: Economic Development In Latin America During The Twentieth Century, Paper presented to the conference "The Lewis Model After 50 Years",University of Manchester, 67 July 2004.
Harris, J and Todaro, M. (1970). "Migration, unemployment and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis." American Economic Review, Vol. 40, pp. 126-42.
Hirota, Y. (2002). Reconsidering of the Lewis Model : Growth in a Dual Economy.
Knight, J. (2007). China, South Africa and the Lewis Model, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, U.K.
Lewis, A.W. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour. The Manchester Sch.Econ.Soc.Stud., May 1954, 22, 139-91.
Lewis, W. A. (1979). "The Dual Economy Revisited," The Manchester School 47: 211-229.
181
AKADEMİK BAKIŞ DERGİSİ Sayı: 56 Temmuz - Ağustos 2016 Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler E-Dergisi
ISSN:1694-528X İktisat ve Girişimcilik Üniversitesi, Türk Dünyası Kırgız - Türk Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Celalabat - KIRGIZİSTAN http ://www. akademikbakis. org
Ranis, G. (2004). Arthur Lewis' contribution to Development thinking and policy, Center Discussion Paper no. 891, Yale University, U.S.
Schultz, T. W. (1964). Transforming Traditional Agriculture, New Haven, Yale University Press.
Sen, A. (1967). "Review of J.C.H. Fei and G. Ranis, Development of the Labour Surplus Economy: Theory and Policy," The Economic Journal 77: 346-349.
Thirlwall, A.P. (1994). Growth and Development. Macmillen Press Ltd., fifth edition, U.K.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com