You are here

Home » Content

RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISM AND CONFLICT

Journal Name:

  • Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study provides an analytical discussion for the issue of religious fundamentalism and its relevance to conflict, in its broader sense. It is stressed that religious fundamentalism manifests itself in two ways: nonviolent intolerance and violent intolerance. The sources of both types of intolerance and their connection to conflict are addressed and discussed in detail. Further research is also suggested on conditions connecting religion to nonviolent intolerance so as to cope with the problem more effectively.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_161047_3_pp_1-13.pdf
  • 2
1-13
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Amuzegar, Jahangir. 1982. The Dynamics of the Iranian Revolution. Albany, NY: State University
of New York Press.
Burton, John W. 1990. Conflict: Human Needs Theory. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
______. Violence Explained. 1990. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
Gurr, Ted R. 1971. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hogg, Michael A. and Abrams, Dominic. 1993. “Towards a Single Process: Uncertainty
Reduction Model of Social Motivations in Groups.” in Group Motivation: Social Psychological Perspectives.
Edited by M. A. Hogg and D. Abrams. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs, 72,
No. 3: 27-45.
______. 1997. Clash of Civilizations and The Remaking of World Order.
New York: Touchstone.
Kelsay, John. 1999. “Religion and the Roots of Conflict,” in Religion and Human Rights. Edited by C.
Gustafson and Peter H. Juviler. New York: Armonk.
Keddie, Nikki R. 1995. Iran and the Muslim World: Resistance and Revolution. New York: New
York University Press.
Little, David. 1996. “Religious Militancy,” in Managing Global Chaos: Sources of and Responses to
International Conflict. Edited by C. A. Crocker et al. Washington D.C.: US Institute of Peace.
Maiese, Michelle. 2005. “What It Means to Dehumanize.”
http//:www.intractableconflict.org/m/dehumanization.jsp
Reykowski, J. 1982. “Social Motivation.” Annual Review of Psychology, 33: 123-154.
Rubin, Bary M. 2002. Islamic Fundamentalism in Egyptian Politics. New York: Palgrave
MacMillian.
Tal, Nahman. 2005. Radical Islam in Egypt and Jordan. Portland: Sussex Academic Press.
Toprak, Binnaz and Sunar, Ilkay. 1993. “Islam in Politics: The Case of Turkey.”
Government and Opposition, Autumn.
Toprak, Binnaz. 1995. “Islam and the Secular State in Turkey.” in Turkey: Political, Social and
Economic Challenges in the 1990s. Edited by C. Balim et al. New York: E. J. Brill.
Volkan, Vamik D. and Itzkowitz, Norman. 1994. Turks and Greeks: Neighbours in Conflict.
Cambridgeshire, UK: The Eothen Press.
© International Journal of Human Sciences ISSN: 1303-5134
www.InsanBilimleri.com/en
Muzaffer Ercan Yilmaz: Religious Fundamentalism and Conflict
13
Volkan, Vamik D. 1997. Bloodlines: From Ethnic Pride to Ethnic Terrorism. New York: Farrar, Straus
and Giroux.
Yilmaz, Muzaffer E. 2002. Religious Revivalism in The Social Identity Context. Unpublished
Doctoral Dissertation, Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University,
Fairfax, VA.
______. 2005. “Enemy Images and Conflict.” Istanbul University SBF Journal, 32 (1): 1-13.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com