ABD hegemonyası ve bölgesel modelleme politikası: Kuramsal çerçeve

Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the middle ground: constructivism in world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3 (3), 319-363. Ayoob, M. ve Zierler, M. (2005). The unipolar concert. World Policy Journal, 22 (1), 31-42. Brzezinski, Z. (2003/2004). Hegemonic quicksand. The National Interest, Winter, 5-16. Carney, T. (2005). The Sudan: Political Islam and terrorism. R.I. Rotberg, (Ed.). Battling terrorism in the horn of Africa. (119-140). Cambridge: World Peace Foundation. Carr, E.H. (1964). The twenty years’ crisis 1919-1939: An introduction to the study of international relations. New York: Harper & Row. Carter, A.B. (2001/02). The architecture of government in the face of terrorism. International Security, 26 (3), 5-23. Cha, V.D. (2000). Globalization and the study of international security. Journal of Peace Research, 37 (3), 391-403. Cohen, A. ve Dale, H. (2005). The advance democracy act: A dose of realism needed. Executive Memorandum, No 968, The Heritage Foundation. Cox, M. (2001). Whatever happened to American decline? International relations and the New United States hegemony. New Political Economy, 6 (3), 311-340. Cronin, A.K. (2002/03). Behind the curve: Globalization and international terrorism. International Security, 27 (3), 30-58. Deshazo, P., Primiani, T. ve McLean, P. (2007). Back from the brink: Evaluating progress in Colombia, 1999-2007. CSIS Report, Washington D.C. Dobriansky, P. (2003). Shining a light: U.S. efforts to strengthen democracy worldwide. U.S. Foreign Policy Agenda: An Electronic Journal of the U.S. Department of State, 8 (1). Edström, H. ve Wiss, A. (Ed.). (2007). International trend analysis-yearbook 2007. Stockholm: Swedish Defence Research Agency. Epstein, S., Serafino, N. ve Miko, F. (2007). Democracy promotion: Cornerstone of U.S. foreign policy?. CRS Report for Congress, Order Code RL34296, December 26. Evans, G. ve Newnham, J. (1998). The penguin dictionary of international relations. New York: Penguin.
Ateş, D. (2009). ABD hegemonyası ve bölgesel modelleme politikası: Kuramsal çerçeve. Uluslararası İnsan
Bilimleri Dergisi [Bağlantıda]. 6:1. Erişim: http://www.insanbilimleri.com
318
Flockhart, T. (2004). Uses and abuses of hegemony: Socialization of democratic norms in post-war Germany and post-war Iraq. Discussion Paper No 27/2004, SPIRIT, Aalborg University. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of the history and the last man. New York: Macmillan. Fuller, G. (2004). Turkey’s strategic model: Myths or realities?. The Washington Quarterly, 27 (3), 51-64. Gartzke, E. (2004). Why democracies may actually be less reliable partners. American Journal of Political Science, 48 (4), 775-795. Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Girdner, E.J. (2004). Operation Iraqi freedom: Invasion, occupation and consolidation of US hegemony in Iraq. Punjab Journal of Politics, 28 (2), 1-31. Girdner, E.J. (2005). The greater middle east initiative: Regime change, neoliberalism and US global hegemony. The Turkish Yearbook, 36, 37-71. Haglund, D.G. (2004). Western Europe and the challenge of the ‘‘unipolar moment’’: Is multipolarity the answer?. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 6 (4). Held, D. (1995). Democracy and the global order: From the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Cambridge: Polity Press. Hyde-Price, A. (2006). Continental drift: Transatlantic relations and American unipolarity. Paper, 31st Annual BISA Conference, 18-20th December 2006, University College Cork. Ikenberry, J.G. (2001a). American power and the empire of capitalist democracy. Review of International Studies, 27, 191-212. Ikenberry, J. (2001b). After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major war. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Ish-Shalom, P. (2006). Theory as a hermeneutical mechanism: The democratic peace thesis and the politics of democratization. Eeuropean Journal of International Relations, 12 (4), 565-598. Jepperson, R.L., Wendt, A. ve Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). Norms, identity and culture in national security. P.J. Katzenstein, (Ed.). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. (33-75). New York: Columbia University Press. Jervis, R. (2002). Theories of war in an era of leading-power peace. American Political Science Review, 96 (1), 1-14. Keohane, R. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Krasner, S. (1983). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Krebs, R.R. ve Lobasz, J.K. (2007). Fixing the meaning of 9/11: Hegemony, coercion and the road to war in Iraq. Security Studies, 16 (3), 409-451. Laffey, M. (2003). Discerning the patterns of world order: Noam Chomsky and international theory after the cold war. Review of International Studies, 29, 587-604. Lang, A.T.F. (2006). Reconstructing embedded liberalism: John Gerard Ruggie and constructivist approaches to the study of international trade regime. Journal of International Economic Law, 9 (1), 81-116. Malka, H. ve Alterman, J. (2006). Arab reform and foreign aid: Lessons from Morocco. CSIS Significant Issues Series, 28 (4), Washington D.C.: The CSIS Press. Mearsheimer, J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W.W. Norton. Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51 (4), 513-553. Morgenthau, H.J. (1992). Politics among nations. New York: McGraw Hill.
Ateş, D. (2009). ABD hegemonyası ve bölgesel modelleme politikası: Kuramsal çerçeve. Uluslararası İnsan
Bilimleri Dergisi [Bağlantıda]. 6:1. Erişim: http://www.insanbilimleri.com
319
Nye, J.S. (2004). The paradox of American power: Why the world’s only superpower can not go it alone. New York: Oxford University Press. Onuf, N. (1994). Constitution of international society. European Journal of International Law, 5 (1), 1-19. Onuf, N. (2002). Worlds of our making: The strange career of constructivism in international relations. D.J. Puchala, (Ed.). Visions of international relations. (119-141). Colombia: University of South Carolina Press. Resnyansky, L. (2007). Integration of social sciences in modelling: An interactionist approach to research practice. Conference Paper, ICCCD, 27-28 August 2007, University of Maryland. Smith, T. (1995). A Wilsonian world. World Policy Journal, 12 (2). Stobdan, P. (2006). Building a strategic partnership with Kazakhstan. Central Asia and the Caucasus Journal of Social and Political Studies, 5 (41), 113-125. Taliaferro, J.W. (2000/01). Security seeking under anarchy. International Security, 25 (3), 128-161. U.S. Government Printing Office. (2006). U.S. security policy in Central Asia: Hearing, October 17, 2005. Serial No 109-132. Washington D.C. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: Random House. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wimelius, M.E. (2007). The future of military interventions: Who, why and where?. H.Edström ve A. Wiss, (Ed.). International trend analysis-yearbook 2007. (117-138). Stockholm: Swedish Defence Research Agency. Wohlforth, W. (1999). The stability of a unipolar world. International Security, 24 (1), 5-41. Zakaria, F. (1998). From wealth to power: The unusual origins of America’s world role. Princeton: Princeton University Press.