You are here

Home » Content

Sociological understanding of the relationship between terrorism and religion

Journal Name:

  • Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Sociology is one of the rare social mechanisms developed by individuals facing difficulties in defining, understanding and coping with the events surrounding them. Therefore, it is argued that any vague area in social life calls for sociological approach. One evident area where fuzziness prevails as to the functions and meaning is the notion of religion. Sociology did not turn a blind eye to religion and defines it as a significant institution playing pivotal roles in shaping the nature of individual’s relationship with others. Some terrorist groups attribute similar amounts of importance to religion and after reinterpretation of basic teachings, they use religion to their benefit. In this article, the attentions were drawn to the process of how religion and particularly Islam has been revisited and reinterpreted in a way to provide terrorist groups guidance - as the literature suggested - in four basic ways. First; how religion becomes the key element in legitimating violence; second, how it has been used as the cure to alienation of in-group members; third, the ways in which religion sets free the group from the need to appeal to larger constitutes; and lastly, how it is used in target selection period.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_161047_7_pp_199-209.pdf
  • 2
199-209
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Akers, R. (2000). Criminological Theories: Introduction, Evaluation, and Application. Los
Angeles: Roxbury.
Aktan, H. (2004). An Islamic perspective: Terror and suicide attacks. In Ergun Capan (Ed.),
Acts of terror and suicide attacks in the light of the Qur’an and the Sunna. (pp. 27-40).
New Jersey, USA: Light Publication.
Bagasi, I. (2004). Kendi Dilinden Hizbullah ve Mücadele Tarihinden Önemli Kesitler.
Turkey: Unknown Publisher.
Cinoglu, H. (1998). An Analysis of Established Terrorist Identitiy in Political and Military
Wings of Turkish Hizbullah. Unpublished dissertation. University of North Texas,
Texas, USA. (Chair David. A. Williamson)
Durkheim E. (1897). Suicide. The Free Press reprint in 1997.
Durkheim, E. (1933). The Division of Labor in Society. (Translated by George Simpson).
New York: The Free Press.
Hoffman, B. (1998). Inside terrorism. Columbia University Press: New York.
Koseli, M. (2006). Poverty, inequality and terrorism in Turkey. Unpublished Doctoral
Dissertation. Virginia Commonwealth University. Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Marx, K. (1844). A Contribution to the Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Germany:
Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher.
Pape, R. A., (2003). The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. The American Political Science
Review, 97, 343-361.
Rapoport, D. C. (1984). Fear and trembling: Terrorism in three religious traditions. The
American Political Science Review, 78(3): 658-677.
Ronald Beiner (1997). Philosophy in a Time of Lost Spirit: Essays on Contemporary Theory.
Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Seligman, C. & Katz, A. N. (1996). The dynamics of value systems. In C.Seligman, J. M.
Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol.
8). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Wimberley, R. C. (1998). Encyclopedia of religion and society. In William H. Swatos, Jr
(Ed.), Commitment. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com