You are here

Home » Content

Computerizing the Cancellation Test1: Design, Development and Validation Study2

Journal Name:

  • World Journal on Educational Technology

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study is about the design, development and validation of computerized version of the Cancellation Test the paper - pencil version of which was first developed by Weintraub and Mesulam (1985). This computerized version consists of four sub-tests (organized letters, random letters, organized shapes and random shapes) and administration panel where only researchers can access. The test was designed and developed according to universally accepted interface design principles. The test was formatively evaluated by administering to a small group of university students and was accordingly revised. The final version of the test was validated on 52 university students and the results were discussed together with the design and development processes.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-computerizing-cancellation-test1-design-development-and-validation-study2.pdf
  • 2
281
290
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Aşkar, P., Altun, A., Cangöz, B., Çevik, V., Kaya, G., & Türksoy, H. (2010). Reliability and validity of computerized
line orientation and enhanced cued recall test for educational purposes. Neuroscience and Education-
2010, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bailey, M.J., Riddoch, M.J., & Crome, P. (2004). Test-retest stability of three tests for unilateral visual neglect in
patients with stroke: Star Cancellation, Line Bisection, and the Baking Tray Task. Neuropsychological
Rehabilitation, 14(4), 403-419.
Barak, A., & English, N. (2002). Prospects and limitations of psychological testing on the Internet. Journal of
Technology in Human Services, 19(2/3), 65-89.
Bayram, S., & Mutlu Bayraktar, D. (2012). Using eye tracking to study on attention and recall in multimedia
learning environments: The effects of design in learning. World Journal on Educational Technology, 4(2),
81-98.
Bioulac, S., Arfi, L., & Bouvard, M.P. (2008). Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and video games: A
comparative study of hyperactive and control children. European Psychiatry, 23(2), 134-41.
Bushman, B.J., & Anderson, C.A. (2009). Comfortably numb: Desensitizing effects of violent media on helping
others. Psychological Science, 20, 273-277.
Byrd, D.A., Touradji, P., & Tang, M. (2004). Cancellation test performance in African American, Hispanic, and
White elderly. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10(3), 401-411.
Cantez, E., Akça, Ş., Akkapulu, F., Bekçi, B., Canlı, P., Çakar, A., & Yıldırım, S. (1996). BİLNOT bataryası testlerinden
işaretleme ve sayı dizisi öğrenme testlerinin test-tekrar test güvenirliği. IX. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi,
İstanbul.
Cernich, A.N., Brennana, D.M., Barker, L.M., & Bleiberg, J. (2007). Sources of error in computerized
neuropsychological assessment. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22S, 39-48.
Çağlar, E., & Koruç, Z. (2006). D2 dikkat testinin sporcularda güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Journal of Sport Sciences,
17(2), 58-80.
Hadwin, A.F., Winne, P.H., & Nesbit, J.C. (2005). Roles for software technologies in advancing research and
theory in educational psychology. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 1-24.
Hansen, E.S., & Lee J.H. (2010). Instrument technical design. Retrieved December 21, 2011, from
http://ccsg.isr.umich.edu/instrdev.cfm
Huang, H.C., & Wang, T.Y. (2005). Computer-assisted cancellation tests for visual neglect patterns. IADIS
International Conference e-Society, 674-676.
Karakaş, S. (2004). BİLNOT bataryası el kitabı: Nöropsikolojik testler için araştırma ve geliştirme çalışmaları (1st
ed.). Ankara: Dizayn Ofset.
Karakaş, S. (2006). Nöropsikoloji, nöropsikolojik değerlendirme, klinik uygulamalar: Ülkemizdeki durum. (Bölüm
8.2). N. Yüksel (Ed.), Ruhsal Hastalıklar. Ankara: MN Medikal & Nobel.
Karakaş, S., & Başar, E. (1993). Nöropsikolojik değerlendirme araçlarının standardizasyonu nöropsikolojik
ölçümlerin elektrofizyolojik ölçümlerle ilişkileri. TÜBİTAK-TBAG. Project No:TÜBİTAK-TBAG 17-2.
Hopcan, S., Polat, E., Irak, M. & Adıgüzel, T. Computerizing the Cancellation Test1: Design, Development and Validation Study2. World Journal
on Educational Technology. 5(2), 281-290.
290
Karakaş, S., & Başar, E. (1995). Nöropsikolojik testlerin Türk örneklemi üzerinde değişik yaş ve eğitim düzeylerine
göre standardizasyonu. II. Sosyal Psikiyatri Sempozyumu. Kriz Dergisi Özel Sayısı, 3(1-2), 177-184.
Karakaş, S., Eski, R., & Başar, E. (1996). Türk kültürü için standardizasyonu yapılmış nöropsikolojik testler
topluluğu: BİLNOT Bataryası. 32. Ulusal Nöroloji Kongresi (pp. 43-70). İstanbul: Ufuk Mat.
Karakaş, S., & Kafadar, H. (1999). Şizofrenideki bilişsel süreçlerin değerlendirilmesinde nöropsikolojik testler:
Bellek ve dikkatin ölçülmesi. Şizofreni Dizisi, 2(4), 132-152.
Kılıç, B.G., Irak, M., Koçkar, A.İ., Şener, Ş., & Karakaş, S. (2002). İşaretleme testi türk formu’nun 6-11 yaş grubu
çocuklarda standardizasyon çalışması. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi, 5(4), 213-228.
Küçük, A., Dolu, N., & Erdoğan, H. T. (2009). İlköğretim öğrencilerinde yaş, cinsiyet ve sosyo-ekonomik seviye
farklılıklarının dikkat düzeyine etkileri. Research Report, Journal of Health Sciences, 18(1), 1-41.
Laurent-Vannier, A., Chevignard, M., Pradat-Diehl, P., Abada, G., & De Agostini, M. (2006). Assessment of
unilateral spatial neglect in children using the Teddy Bear Cancellation Test. Dev Med Child Neurol, 48,
120-5.
Lichtenberger, E.O. (2006). Computer utilization and clinical judgment in psychological assessment reports.
Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(1), 19-32.
Mandell, D.J., & Sackett, G.P. (2008). A computer touch screen system and training procedure for use with
primate infants: Results from pigtail monkeys (macaca nemestrina). Developmental Psychobiology, 50,
160-170.
Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-52178-749-1.
Norman, K.L. (2001). Implementation of conditional branching in computerized self-Administered questionnaires.
Laboratory for Automation Psychology Technical Report, University of Maryland (LAP-TR-2001-1).
Paul, R.H., Lawrence, J., Williams, L.M., Richard, C.C., Cooper, N., & Gordon, E. (2005). Preliminary validity of
“Integneuro”: A new computerized battery of neurocognitive tests. International Journal of Neuroscience,
115, 1549-1567.
Richey, R.C., & Klein, J.D. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional
design and development practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 23–38.
Rogers, P.L. (2001). Designing instruction for technology enhanced learning. London: IRM Press.
Sommerville, I. (2004). Software engineering (7th ed.). Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
Sternberg, R.J. (2009). Cognitive psychology (5th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
Wang, T.Y., Huang, H.C., & Huang, H.S. (2006). Design and implementation of cancellation tasks for visual search
strategies and visual attention in schoolchildren. Computers & Education, 47, 1-16.
Weintraub, S., & Mesulam, M.M. (1985). Mental state assessment of young and elderly adults in behavioral
neurology. In M. M. Mesulam (Ed.), Principles of Behavioral Neurology (pp. 71-124). Philadelphia: F.A.
Davis.
Yalın, H.İ. (2006). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com