You are here

Home » Content

ANAYASANIN EKONOMİK ANALİZİ: BİR OYUN TEORİSİ YAKLAŞIMI

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CONSTITUTION: A GAME THEORY APPROACH

Journal Name:

  • Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper aims to present a law and economic perspective over constitution. The paper consists of two sections. The first section discusses what the constitutional contract and processes in economic analysis of a constitution mean specifically in terms of Law and Economics literature. The second section analyzes the role of interest groups in a constitution making process and a constitution amendment from a game theoretical perspective. In particular, the constitution making processes in a rentseeking society is analyzed from the perspective of private interest groups and the interaction between a law-maker and interest groups is considered. Lastly, the paper introduces a game theoretical approach in the context of asymmetric information and a credible commitment to the interaction between constituent as a principal and policy maker as an agent in the constitution making processes.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale, anayasa üzerine bir Hukuk ve Ekonomi perspektifi sunmayı amaçlanmaktadır. Makale iki bölümden oluşmaktadır. İlk bölüm, bir anayasanın ekonomik analizinde, anayasal sözleşme ve süreçlerin özellikle Hukuk ve Ekonomi literatürü açısından ne anlam ifade ettiğini tartışmaktadır. İkinci bölüm, anayasa yapma süreçlerinde çıkar gruplarının rolünü ve oyun teorisi perspektifinden anayasa değişikliğini analiz etmektedir. Özellikle bir rant arama toplumunda anayasa yapma süreçleri, özel çıkar grupları perspektifinden ele alınmakta ve yasa koyucu ile çıkar grupları arasındaki ilişki incelenmektedir. Son olarak makale, bir anayasa yapma sürecinde seçmen ve politika yapıcı arasındaki etkileşime, asimetrik bilgi ve güvenilir taahhüt bağlamında oyun teorik bir yaklaşım getirmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-anayasanin-ekonomik-analizi-bir-oyun-teorisi-yaklasimi.pdf
  • 11
101–122
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Acemoglu, D. ve J. A. Robinson (2006), Economic Origins of Dictatorship and
Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Akalin, G. (1994), “Anayasamızın Piyasa Ekonomisi ile Uyumlaştırılması: Mali ve
Ekonomik Hükümler ile Sosyal ve Ekonomik Hak ve Ödevlerin Yeniden
Düzenlenmesi”, Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, 11, ss. 71-87.
Baron, D. (1995), “The Economics and Politics of Regulation: Perspectives, Agenda
and Approaches”, Modern Political Economy: Old Topics, New Directions,
(Der. J. S. Banks ve E. A. Hanushek), USA: Cambridge University Press, ss.
10-62.
Berggren, N. ve N. Karlson (2003),“Constitutionalism, Division of Power and
Transaction Costs”, Public Choice, 117: ss. 99-124.
Boettke, P. J. (2001), “Credibility, Commitment, and Soviet Economic Reform”,
Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political
Economy, (Der. P. J. Boettke), New York: Routledge, ss. 154-175.
Coase, R. H. (1960), ‘‘The Problem of Social Cost,’’ Journal of Law Economics, 3(1),
ss. 1-44.
Coase, R. H. (1988), The Firm, the Market, and the Law, Chicago: The University of
Chicago Press.
Cooter, R. (2000), The Strategic Constitution, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Cooter, R. ve T. Ulen (2004), Law and Economics, USA: Addison Wesley Longman.
Coyne, C. J. ve P. J. Boettke (2009), “The Problem of Credible Commitment in
Reconstruction”, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(1), ss. 1-23.
Crain, W. M. ve R. D. Tollison (1979), “Constitutional Change in an Interest-Group
Perspective”, Journal of Legal Studies, 8(1), ss. 165-175.
Çetin, T. ve T. Vural (2009), “Anayasanın ve Anayasa Yapmanın Ekonomik Analizi”,
II. Ulusal Yönetim ve Ekonomi Bilimleri Konferansı, İzmir, ss. 69-80.
Dixit, A. (1996), The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Perspective,
Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Gilardi, F. (2008), Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory
Agencies in Western Europe, England: Edward Elgar.
Kreps, D. M. (1990), Game Theory and Economic Modelling, Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Landes, W. ve R. Posner (1975), “The Independent Judiciary in an Interest-Group
Perspective”, Journal of Law and Economics, 18(3), ss. 875-901.
Macey, J. (1988), “Transaction Costs and the Normative Elements of the Public Choice
Model: An Application to Constitutional Theory”, Virginia Law Review, 74(2),
ss. 471-518.
Majone, G. (2001a), “Non-majoritarian Institutions and the Limits of Democratic
Governance: A Political Transaction-Cost Approach”, Journal of Institutional
and Theoretical Economics, 157(1), ss. 57-78.
Majone, G. (2001b), “Two Logics of Delegation: Agency and Fiduciary Relations in
EU Governance”, European Union Politics, 2(1), ss. 103-122.
Menard, C. ve M. Shirley (2005), Handbook of New Institutional Economics,
Netherlands: Springer.
North, D. (1993), “Institutions and Credible Commitment”, Journal of Institutional and
Theoretical Economics, 149(1), ss. 11-23.
North, D. C. (1991), “Institutions”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), ss. 97-
112.
North, D. C. ve Weingast, B. R. (1989), “Constitutions and Commitment: The
Evolution of Institutional Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century
England” Journal of Economic History, 49(4), ss. 803-832.
Nye, J. (2008), “Institutions and the Institutional Environment”, New Institutional
Economics a Guidebook, (Der. E. Brousseau ve J-M. Glachant), New York:
Cambridge University Press, ss. 67-80.
Özbudun, E. (2004), Türk Anayasa Hukuku, Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları.Posner, R. (1998), Economic Analysis of Law, New York: Aspen Law and Business.
Persson, T. ve G. Tabellini (2003), The Economic Effects of Constitutions,
Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Savaş, V. F. (1998), “Anayasa Mahkemesi ve Özelleştirme: İktisadi Yaklaşım”,
Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, 15, ss. 79-98.
Spiller, P. (1996), “Institutions and Commitment”, Industrial and Corporate Change,
5(2), ss. 421-452.
Ulusoy, A. ve F. Oguz (2007), “The Privatization of Electricity Distribution in Turkey:
A Legal and Economic Analysis”, Energy Policy, 35 (10), ss. 5021-5034.
Viscusi, W. K., J. M. Vernon ve J. E. Harrington (1996); Economics of Regulation and
Antitrust, MA: The MIT Press.
Voigt, S. (2008), “Constitutional Political Economy: Analyzing Formal Institutions at
the Most Elementary Level”, New Institutional Economics a Guidebook, (Der.
E. Brousseau ve J-M. Glachant), New York: Cambridge University Press, ss.
363-388.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com