Buradasınız

Peri-implant yumuşak doku komplikasyonunun tedavisinde bir modifiye serbest diş eti grefti yaklaşımı

A modified free gingival graft approach in the treatment of a peri-implant soft tissue complication

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of the present case report is to demonstrate the use of thick epithelized free gingival grafting method for the treatment of a soft tissue complication occurring around dental implants placed into a fibula-free flap reconstructed mandibular defect. Desirable amount of keratinized tissue was obtained around all implants at the end of the treatment. Although graft dimensions were decreased with time, no marginal tissue movement or any other mucogingival problem were determined. The hyperplastic tissue formation was totally eliminated. The modified thick epithelialized free gingival grafting method may be a suitable alternative method for the elimination of certain mucogingival problems arising around dental implants in the presence of a scar-like tissue.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu olgu sunumunda, kalın epitelize serbest diş eti grefti yöntemi kullanılarak, kemiksel gerftleme ile rekonstrüksiyona tabi tutulmuş bir mandibular defekt bölgesinde bulunan implantların çevresindeki yumuşak doku komplikasyonunun tedavisi gösterilmektedir. Tedavi bitiminde tüm implantların etrafında hedeflenen keratinize doku miktarı izlendi. Greft boyutlarında zamanla azalma olmasına rağmen, marjinal doku hareketi veya başka bir mukogingival problem tespit edilmedi. Hiperplastik doku formasyonu tamamen elimine edildi. Modifiye kalın serbest diş eti grefti yöntemi, dental implantlar etrafındaki skar ve benzeri dokuların varlığında ve bazı mukogingival problemlerin giderilmesinde alternatif bir tedavi seçeneği olarak düşünülebilir
127-130

REFERENCES

References: 

References
1. Lang NP, Wilson TG, Corbet EF. Biological complications
with dental implants: their prevention, diagnosis and
treatment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 146-155.
2. Hughes WG, Howard CW. Simultaneous split-thickness
skin grafting and placement of endosteal implants in
the edentulous mandible: a preliminary report. J Oral
Maxillofac Surg 1992; 50: 448-451.
3. Rosenquist B. A comparison of various methods of soft
tissue management following the immediate placement
of implants into extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxilofac
Implants 1997; 12: 43-51.
4. Block MS, Kent JN. Factors associated with soft- and
hard-tissue compromise of endosseous implants. J Oral
Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48: 1153-1160.
5. Thies RM, Sager RD. Lipswitch vestibuloplasty in
conjunction with implant placement. Compendium
1991; 12: 456-458.
6. Bjorn H. Free transplantation of gingival propria. Sven
Tandlaek Tidskr 1963; 22: 684-689.
7. Dorfman HS, Kennedy JE, Bird WC. Longitudinal
evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts. A four
year report. J Periodontol 1982; 53: 349-352.
8. Chiapasco M. Implants for patients with maxillofacial
defects and following irradiation. In: Lang NL, Karring
T, Lindhe, J (eds). Proceedings III European Workshop
on Periodontology. Berlin: Quintessence, 1999;
557-607.
9. Langer B, Sullivan DY. Osseointegration: its impact on
the interrelationship of periodontics and restorative
dentistry: Part I. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent
1989; 9: 84-105.
10. Wikesjö UME, Nilvéus RE, Selvig KA. Significance of
early healing events on periodontal repair: a review. J
Periodontol 1992; 63: 158-165.
11. Hatipoglu H, Keceli HG, Guncu GN, Sengun D, Tozum
TF. Vertical and horizontal dimensional evaluation
of free gingival grafts in the anterior mandible: a case
report series. Clin Oral Investig 2007; 11: 107-113.
12. Berg RW, Goldman BM, Kurtz K, Schweitzer K, Kraut
RA. Prosthodontic management of sulcoplasty and
sialodochoplasty with a conforming surgical stent. J
Prosthodont 2008; 17: 52-54.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com