Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

THE EFFECTS OF MNEMONIC KEY WORD METHOD ON SCIENCE LESSONS: ACCESS AND ATTITUDE OF STUDENTS

Journal Name:

  • International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this research is to define the affect of Keyword Mnemonics in 6th class Science Lesson on the students' achievements and their attitudes. Treatment started with the application of achievement and attitude pretests for the experiment and control groups. Afterwards, while keyword mnemonics were used for the experiment groups, traditional method was used for the control groups during the courses. At the end of the courses the achievement and attitude post test was applied to each group. At the end of the research it is seen that the students who were trained by using the key word mnemonics had higher achievements than the ones trained by using the traditional method. A significant difference was not found between the control group and the experiment group in terms of attitude points.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-effects-mnemonic-key-word-method-science-lessons-access-and-attitude-students.pdf
  • 4
1-8
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (1984). “Yabancı Dil Sözcüklerinin Öğretilmesinde Bellek Destekleyici Anahtar Sözcük Yönteminin
Etkileri”, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Baykul, Y. (1990). İlkokul Beşinci Sınıftan Lise ve Dengi Okulların Son Sınıflarına Kadar Matematik ve Fen
Derslerine Karşı Tutumda Görülen Değişmeler ve Öğrenci Seçme Sınavındaki Başarı ile İlişkili Olduğu Düşünülen
Bazı Faktörler. Ankara: ÖSYM
Carlson, N. R. , Buskıst, W. & Martin, G. N. (2000). Psychology: The Science of Behavior- Europian Adaptation (6.
ed.). Great Britain: Pearson Education Limited.
Carlson, R. F., Kincaid, J. P., Lance, S.,& Hodgson, T. (1976). Spontaneous Use Of Mnemonics And Grade Point
Average. The Journal of Psychology, 92, 117-122.
Carney, R. N., Levin, J. R. (2000). Fading Mnemonic Memories: Here is Looking Anew, Again. Contemporary
Educational Psychology 25, 499-508.
Carney, R. N., Levin, J. R. (2003). Promoting Higher-Order Learning Benefits By Building Lower Order Mnemonic
Connections. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 17: 563-575.
Carney, R. N., Levin, J. R. & Stackhouse T. L. (1997). Brief Research Report: The Face-Name Mnemonic Strategy
From a Different Perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology 22, 399-412.
Doğan, A. ( 1995). Simultane Tıp Çevirisi Eğitiminde Bellek Destekleyici Anahtar Sözcük Yönteminin Etkililik
Derecesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Dretzke, B. J., Levin, J. R. (1990). Building Factual Knowledge About the U.S. Presidents via Pictorial Mnemonic
Strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology. Vol 15, Issue 2, 152-169.
Ellis, E.S. (1998) (Visual And Auditory LINCS to Background Knowledge: A Key for Learning New Terms
http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/teaching_techniques/ellis_lincs.pdf
Franke, T. M., Levin, J. R., & Carney, R. N. (1991). Mnemonic Arwork-Learning Strategies: Helping Students
Remember More Than “Who Painted What?”. Contemporary Educational Psychology. Vol 16, ıssue 4, 375-390.
Fulk, B. (2000). Make İnstruction More Memorable. İntervention in School and Clinic, Vol 35, no 3, 183-184.
Hogben, D., Lawson, M. J. (1998). Learning and Recall of Forein Language Vocabulary: Effects of a Keyword
Strategy for İmmediate and Delayed Recall. Learning and İnstruction, vol 8, no 22, 179-194
Mastropieri, M. A. & Scruggs, T. E. (1998). Enhancing School Success with Mnemonic Strategies. İntervention in
School and Clinic, March.
http://www.ldonline.org/ld_indepth/teaching_techniques/mnemonic_strategi...
Olçum, Y. (2000). İlköğretim 4. Sınıf Sosyal Bilgiler Dersinde Bellek Destekleyicilerin Erişi ve Kalıcılığa Etkisi.
Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Ormrod, J. E. (1990). Human Learning(2. ed.). New Jersay: Prentice Hall.
Rummel, N., Levin, J. R.& Woodward, M. M. (2003). Do Pictorial Mnemonic Text-Learning Aids Give Students
Something Worth Writing About? Journal of Educational Psychology. v 95, i 2, p 327.
Scruggs, T. E.& Mastropieri, M. A. (2000) The Effectiveness of Mnemonic Instruction for Students with Learning
and Behavior Problems: An Update and Research Synthesis. Journal of Behavioral Education, vol. 10, Nos.2/3,
163-173.
Senemoğlu, N. (1997). Gelişim Öğrenme ve Öğretim: Kuramdan Uygulamaya. Ankara: Spot Matbaacılık.
Stephens, J. A. H., Dwyer, F. M. (1997). Effect Of Varied Mnemonic Strategies İn Facilitating Student
Achievement of Different Educational Objectives. İnternatioal Journal of İnstructional Media, 24, 1; Proquest
Educational Journals pg.75.
Uberti, H. Z., Scruggs, T. E & Mastropierri, M. A. (2003). Keywords Make the Difference: Mnemonic Instruction
in ınclusive Classrooms. TEACHİNG Exceptional Children, Vol. 35, No.3, 56-61.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com