THE EFFECTS OF PERCEIVED INSTRUMENTALITY AND FUTURE TIME PERSPECTIVE ON STUDENTS’ GRADED PERFORMANCE AND ATTITUDES REGARDING ENGLISH CLASS

Adelabu, D. H. (2007). Time perspective and school membership as correlates to academic achievement among
African American adolescents. Adolescence, 42(167), 525–538.
Altunay, U. (2004). Üniversite İngilizce hazırlık öğrencilerinin İngilizceye yönelik tutumlarıyla bazı bireysel
değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler [The relationship between English language preparatory year students’ attitudes
regarding English and some individual variables]. 13. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kurultayı, Malatya.
Bembenutty, H. (2010). Present and future goals: Perceived instrumentality of schoolwork. Psychology Journal,
7(1), 2-14.
Bilde, J. D., Vansteenkiste, M., & Lens, W. (in press). Understanding the association between future time
perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory, Learning and Instruction,
doi:10.1016/j.learninstruct.2010.03.002
Creten, H., Lens, W., & Simons, J. (2001). The role of perceived instrumentality in student motivation. In A.
Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 37–45), New York,
NY: Kluwer.
Eren, A. (2007). Gelecek zaman perspektifi ölçeği [Future time perspective scale]. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama,
6(12), 79–96.
Gjesme, T. (1983). On the concept of future time orientation: Considerations of some functions and
measurements’ implications. International Journal of Psychology, 18, 443–461.
Horstmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year
university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 703–718.
Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34(2),
113–125.
Husman, J., Derryberry, W. P., Crowson, H. M., & Lomax, R. (2004). Instrumentality, task value, and intrinsic
motivation: Making sense of their independent interdependence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29,
63-76.
Husman, J., & Shell, D. F. (2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time
perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 166–175.
Leonardi, A. (2007). Future time perspective, possible selves, and academic achievement. New Directions for
Adult and Continuing Education, 114, 17–26.
Lomranz, J., Shmotkin, D., & Katznelson, D. B. (1983). Coherence as a measure of future time perspective in
children and its relationship to delay of gratification and social class, International Journal of Psychology, 18,
407-413.
Malka, A., & Covington, M. V. (2005). Perceiving school performance as instrumental to future attainment:
Effects on graded performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 60–80.
Miller, R. B., DeBacker, T. K., & Greene, B. A. (1999). Perceived instrumentality and academics: The link to task
valuing. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 26, 250–260.
Phan, H. P. (2009). Future time perspective in sociocultural contexts: A discussion paper. Electronic Journal of
Research in Educational Psychology, 7(2), 761-778.
Rencher, A. C. (2002). Methods of multivariate analysis. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
Simons, J., Dewite, S., & Lens, W. (2004). The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study
strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you’ll know what you learn. British Journal of Educational
Psychology, 74, 343–360.
Teahan, J. E. (1958). Future time perspective, optimism, and academic achievement. Journal of Abnormal Social
Psychology, 57(3), 379–380.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2008). The time paradox: the new psychology of time. London: Rider.