Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

UNİLATERAL KONDİLER HİPERPLAZİNİN KONİK IŞINLI BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİ İLE DEĞERLEN DİRİLMESİ: İKİ OLGU SUNUMU VE LİTERATÜR DERLEMESİ

EVALUATION OF UNILATERAL CONDYLAR HYPERPLASIA BY CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: A REPORT OF TWO CASES AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Condylar hyperplasia is an uncommon malformation of the mandible involving change in the size and morphology of the condylar neck and head. Although the clinical findings such as malocclusion and facial asymmetry point to condylar hyperplasia, radiologic evaluation is essential. Linear and angular measurements made using the Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) software can provide information to determine maxillary or facial and skull bone involvement. This report presents two cases which illustrate the effectiveness of CBCT for the diagnostic evaluation of condylar hyperplasia. The cone-beam imaging offers a dose- and cost-effective alternative with high-detailed images and comprehensive analysis for the diagnosis of osseous abnormalities of the TMJ.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kondiler hiperplazi, kondil başı ve boynunda boyutsal ve morfolojik değişikliğe neden olan nadir görülen bir anomalidir. Maloklüzyon ve fasiyal asimetri gibi klinik bulgular kondiler hiperplaziyi işaret etse de kesin tanı için radyolojik değerlendirme esastır. Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (Cone Beam Computed Tomography, CBCT) kullanarak yapılan doğrusal ve açısal ölçümler ile maksilla veya diğer kafa-yüz kemiklerinin etkilenip etkilenmediği değerlendirilebilir. Bu makalede, kondiler hiperplazinin teşhis ve değerlendirmesinde CBCT'nin etkinliği iki olgu eşliğinde rapor edilmiştir. Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı görüntüleme, temporomandibular eklemin kemiksel anomalilerinin teşhisinde düşük radyasyon dozu, yüksek kalitede görüntü ve kapsamlı analizler sağlayan ekonomik bir alternatif sunmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-unilateral-kondiler-hiperplazinin-konik-isinli-bilgisayarli-tomografi-ile-degerlen-dirilmesi-iki-olgu-sunumu-literatur-derlemesi.pdf
  • 3
198-204
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot J/, editors. Oral & maxillofacial pathology. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1995, pp 15-16.
2. Yang J, Lignelli JL, Ruprecht A. Mirror image condylar hyperplasia in two siblings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol /ndod 2004;97(2):281-285.
3. White SC. Cone-beam imaging in dentistry. Health Phys 2008; 95(5): 628-637.
4. Kaneyama K, Segami N, Hatta T. Congenital deformities and developmental abnormalities of the mandibular condyle in the temporomandibular joint. Congenit Anom (Kyoto)
2008; 48(3):118-125.
5. Tsiklakis K, Syriopoulos K, Stamatakis HC. Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33(3):196-201.
6. Howerton WB Jr, Mora MA. Advancements in digital imaging: what is new and on the horizon?
J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139(6):20-24.
7.
Samu
r S. Dişhekimliğinde Cone Beam Bilgisayarlı Tomografi. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi 2009;
3(2): 346-351.
8. Rudisch A, /mshoff R, Maurer H, Kovacs P, Bodner G. Pathologic- sonographic correlation in temporomandibular joint pathology. /ur Radiol
2006; 16: 1750-1756.
203
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni
Cilt:20, Sayı: 3, Yıl: 2010, Sayfa: 198-204
9. Mühlberger G, Svejda M, Lottersberger C, /mshoff R, Putz R, Kuhn V. Mineralization density and apparent density in mandibular condyle bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
/ndod 2009; 107: 573- 579.
10. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji /, Langlais RP. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol
/ndod 2009; 107: 420-25.
11. Obwegeser HL, Makek MS. Hemimandibular hyperplasia-hemimandibular elongation. J Maxillofac Surg 1986;14(4):183-208.
12. Pripatnanont P, Vittayakittipong P, Markmanee U, Thongmak S, Yipintsol T. The use of SP/CT to evaluate growth cessation of the mandible in unilateral condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34(4):364-368.
13. Marchetti C, Cocchi R, Gentile L, Bianchi A. Hemimandibular hyperplasia: treatment strategies. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
2000;11(1):46-53.
14. Deleurant Y, Zimmermann A, Peltomâki T. Hemimandibular elongation: treatment and long-term follow-up. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11(3):172-179.
15. Saridin CP, Raijmakers P, Becking AG. Quantitative analysis of planar bone scintigraphy in patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol /ndod
2007;104(2):259-263.
16. Harris SA, Quayle AA, Testa HJ. Radionuclide bone scanning in the diagnosis and management of condylar hyperplasia. Nucl Med Commun
1984;5(6):373-380.
17. Chan WL, Carolan MG, Fernandes VB, Abbati DP. Planar versus SP/T imaging in the assessment of condylar growth. Nucl Med Commun
2000;21(3):285-290.
18. Jacobsen PU, Lund K. Unilateral overgrowth and remodeling processes after fracture of the mandibular condyle. A longitudinal radiographic study. Scand J Dent Res 1972;80(1):68-74.
19. Rubenstein LK, Campbell RL. Acquired unilateral condylar hyperplasia and facial asymmetry:
TATLI,
K/L/Ş
, /S/N, ÖZTUNÇ
report of case. ASDC J Dent Child
1985;52(2):114-120.
20. Link TM, Koppers BB, Licht T, Bauer J, Rummeny /J. In vitro and in vivo spiral CT to determine bone mineral density: Initial experience in patients at risk for osteoporosis. Radiology 2004;
231: 805-811.
21. Thompson P, Taylor J, Fisher A, Oliver R. Quantitative heel ultrasound in 3180 women between 45 and 75 years of age: compliance, normal ranges and relationship to fracture history. Osteoporos Int 1998; 8: 211-214.
22. Laib A, Newitt DC, Lu Y, Majumdar S. New model-independent measures of trabecular bone structure applied to in vivo high resolution MR images. Osteoporosis Int 2002;13:130-136.
23. Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 2: Clinical Applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30(7): 1285-92.
24. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol /ndod 2008;106(1):106 -14.
25. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, et al. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33(2):83-86.
26. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol /ndod 2003;96:508-513.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com