1. Teters, P. and Gabel, D. (1984), 1982-83 Results of the NSTA survey of the needs of elementary
teachers regarding their teaching of science, Washington, National Science Teachers
Association.
2. Sheldon, L.E.(1988) Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials, ELT Journal 42, 237–246.
3. Sharp, A. (1999) Aspects of English medium textbook use in Hong Kong, New Horizons
in Education 40, 93–102. 4. Pepin, B. and Haggarty, L. (2001) Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French
and German classrooms, Zentrablatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik 33, 158–175.
5. Skiersko, A. (1991) Textbook selection and evaluation, in M. Celce-Murcia (ed.), Teaching
English as a Second or Foreign Language, Boston, Heinle & Heinle, pp. 432-453.
6. Rymarz, R. and Engebretson, K. (2005) Putting textbooks to work, British Journal of Religious
Education 27, 53–63.
7. Kuhn, T.S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.), University of Chicago
Press, Chicago.
8. Tanner, D. (1988) The textbook controversies, in L.N. Tanner (ed.), Critical Issues in Curriculum
(Eighty-SeventhYearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education,
Part I), National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, 122–147.
9. Dörfler,W. and McLone, R.R. (1986) Mathematics as a school subject, in B. Christiansen,
A.G. Howson and M. Otte (eds.), Perspectives in Mathematics Education, Reidel, Dordrecht,
pp. 49–97.
10. Farrell, J.P. and Heyneman, S.P. (1994) Planning for textbook development in developing
countries, in T. Hus´en and T.N. Postlethwaite (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education
(2nd ed., Vol. 2), BPC Wheatons, pp. 6360–6366.
11. Woodward, A. (1994) Textbooks, in T. Husen and T.N. Postlethwaite(eds.), International
Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed., Vol. 2),Exeter, pp.6366–6371.
12. Herbst, P. (1995) The Construction of the Real Number System in Textbooks: A Contribution
to the Analysis of Discursive Practices in Mathematics, unpublished master’s thesis,
University of Georgia, Athens.
13. Ball, D.L. and Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988) Using textbooks and teacher’s guides: A dilemma
for beginning teachers and teacher educators, Curriculum Inquiry 18, 401–423.
14. Burstein, L.(ed.), (1993) The IEA Study of Mathematics 3: Student Growth and Classroom
Processes, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
15. Kuhs, T.M. and Freeman, D.J. (1979) The Potential Influence of Textbooks on Teachers’
Selection of Content for Elementary School Mathematics, paper presented at the annual
meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
16. Howson, G. (1995) Mathematics Textbooks: A Comparative Study of Grade 8 Texts, Pacific
Educational Press, Vancouver.
17. Lumsdaine, A.A. (1963) ‘Instruments and media of instruction’, in N.L. Gage (ed.),
Handbook of Research on Teaching, Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 583–682.
18. Remillard, J.T. (2000) ‘Can curriculum materials support teachers’ learning? Two fourthgrade
teachers’ use of a new mathematics text’, Elementary School Journal 100, 331–
350.
19. Stodolsky, S.S. (1989) Is teaching really by the book?, in P.W. Jackson and S. Horoutunian-
Gordon (eds.), From Socrates to Software: The Teacher as Text and the Text as Teacher
(Eighty-Ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I),
University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 159–184.
20. Otte, M. (1986) What is a text? in B. Christiansen, A.G. Howson and M. Otte (eds.), Perspectives
in Mathematics Education, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 173–204. 21. Balacheff, N. and Gaudin, N. (2003) Baghera assessment project , in S. Soury-Lavergne
(ed.), Baghera Assessment Project: Designing an Hybrid and Emergent Educational Society.
Les Cahiers du Laboratoire Leibniz, # 81, Grenoble, Laboratorie Leibniz-IMAG (
available at www-leibniz.imag.fr/LesCahiers/).
22. Sierpinska A. (1992) On understanding the notion of function, in The concept of function:
Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy, Mathematical Association of America MAA Notes.
25. 25-58.
23. Chevallard, Y. (1992) Fundamental concepts in didactics: Perspectives provided by an
anthropological approach.’ In R. Douady and A. Mercier (eds.), Research in Didactique
of Mathematics, La Pensée Sauvage, Grenoble,131-167.
24. Yıldırım A.ve Simsek H. (1999) Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri, Ankara:
Seçkin Yayınevi.
25. Beyazıt İ. (2008) Fonksiyonlar konusunun Öğretiminde Karşılaşılan Zorluklar ve Çözüm
Önerileri, Matematiksel Kavram Yanılgıları ve Çözüm Önerileri, M.F.Özmantar, E. Bingölbali
ve H. Akkoç (Ed). Matematiksel Kavram Yanılgıları ve Çözüm Önerileri (s.91-
117). Ankara: PegemA.
26. Thompson, P. W. (1994) Students, Functions, and the UndergraduateCurriculum. In E.
Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education,
I, CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 4, pp. 21-44.
27. Duval, R. (1993) Registres de représentations sémiotiques et fonctionnement cognitif de
la pensée, Annales de Didactique et de Sciences Cognitives, Vol. 5, pp. 37-65.
28. Bloch, I. (2003) Teaching functions in a graphic milieu: What forms of knowledge enable
students to conjecture and prove?, Educational Studies in Mathematics Vol. 52, pp. 3-28.
29. Akkoç, H. (2005). Fonksiyon kavramının anlaşılması: Çoklu temsiller ve tanımsal özellikleri,
Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 20, 14 - 24.
30. Rene de Cotret, S. (1988) Une etude sur les representations graphiques du mouvement
comme moyen d’acceder au concept de fonction ou de variable dependante,
Petit x, 17, 5-27.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
