Buradasınız

THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL STYLE IN EVALUATING ACADEMIC PRESENTATIONS OF ENGINEERING PROJECTS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.50
Abstract (2. Language): 
An individual’s social style is determined by behavioral patterns in the interactions with their peers. Some studies suggest that social style may influence the way in which an individual’s performance is evaluated. We studied the effects that speakers’ and evaluators’ social styles have on the marks given for end-of-term presentations in a project engineering master’s course. The participants completed a self-evaluation exercise that classified their social styles into one of four categories: Driver, expressive, analytical, or amiable. Students individually rated the content and appearance of their classmates’ presentations. A statistical analysis of these scores revealed that the speaker’s social style had a significant effect on the marks received for content and appearance. The evaluator’s social style also demonstrated a statistically significant effect on the marks given for appearance, though not for content. Students with expressive social style received the highest scores, while the analytical style received the lowest scores. These results reiterate the necessity to train students as evaluators in order to reduce bias when evaluating their classmates and co-workers during their academic and professional careers.
68-76

REFERENCES

References: 

Antonioni, D., & Park, J. (2001). The effects of personality similarity on peer ratings of contextual work
behaviours. Personnel Psychology, 54, 331-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00095.x
Hall, K., & Burke, W. (2003). Making formative assessment work - Effective practice in the primary classroom.
Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Kaftan, J., Buck, G., & Haack, A. (2006). Using formative assessments to individualize instruction and promote
learning. Middle School Journal, 37(4), 44-49.
Linguistic Services. http://www.upc.edu/slt/comcomunicar Last consulted 10/08/2012.
Marín García, J.A. (2009). Students and professors as evaluators. Application in the evaluation of oral
presentations. Spanish Journal of Pedagogy, 242, 79-98.
May, G.L., & Gueldenzoph, L.E. (2006). The effect of social style on peer evaluation ratings in project teams.
Journal of Business Communication, 43(1), 4-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021943605282368
Mumford, M.D. (1983). Social comparison theory and peer evaluation. Personnel Psychology, 36, 867-881.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1983.tb00516.x
Orpen, C. (1994). Perceived similarity: Its effect on the accuracy of peer evaluations among university students.
International Journal of Educational Management, 8(3), 4-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513549410062371
Scriven, M. (1967). The Methodology of Evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally.
TRACOM (1991). The social style profile - technical report: Development, reliability, and validity. Denver, CO: The
TRACOM Corporation.
Wilson Learning co.http://www.wilsonlearning.co.uk/docs/social_style_self_profile.pdf Last consulted 12/08/2012.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com