Buradasınız

Measuring Semantic Similarity in Grids Using Ontology

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Grid computing, a new and broad area of research, aims at sharing available information and resources through the use of computers over the network. To use the new applications of grid, it is necessary to adapt the modern software components and assembled information resources in a flexible format. Web services incorporate the necessary capabilities in achieving this goal called grid services. Due to the exponentially increasing amount of data, documents, resources and services available on the web, finding an acceptable agreement between the user and the abilities of web or grid service as well as forming an appropriate composition of service components for performing requested operation are critical issues. Measuring the similarity of services is an important and valuable solution that is used in some practical reasoning such as replacement of a service with another and combination of services and applications. Also, because the measuring the service similarity needs an appropriate semantic model, therefore, in this paper a semantic model based on OWL ontology language for services is presented and thus, similarity measure is provided. We find a semantic model for services and then provide a method for measuring the similarity between two services. A mathematical model for solving given problems is also proposed. The results evaluated by F1 measure obviously show the improvement of accuracy against previous method.
230-237

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Ganjisaffar, Y., Abollhasani , H., Neshati, M., and Jamali , M., “A Similarity Measure for OWL-S Annotated Web Services”,
Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI 2006 Main Conference
Proceedings), 2006, Page(s): 621 - 624.
[2] Xiaofeng Du, William Song, Malcolm Munro, “Service Composition in the Context of Grid”, 2006.
[3] G. Stumme and A. Maedche, “Ontology merging for federated ontologies on the semantic web,” in Proceedings of the
International Workshop for Foundations of Models for Information Integration (FMII-2001), Sept. 2001.
[4] S. Melnik, H. Garcia-Molina, and E. Rahm, “Similarity flooding: A versatile graph matching algorithm and its applications
to schema matching,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Data Engineering. San Jose, CA: IEEE
Computer Society, Feb. 2002.
[5] Martin, D., Paolucci, M., Mcllraith, S., Burstein, M., McDermott, D., McGuinness, D., Parsia, B., Payne, T., Sabou, M.,
Solanki, M., Srinivasan, N., and Sycara, K., “Bringing Semantics to Web Services: The OWL-S Approach”, presented at
First International Workshop on Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition (SWSWPC), San Diego,
California, USA, 2004.
[6] A. Tversky, “Features of similarity,” Psycological Review, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 327–352, 1977.
[7] P. Raftopoulou and E. Petrakis, “Semantic similarity measures: A comparison study,” Technical University of Crete,
Department of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Tech. Rep. TR-TUC-ISL-04-2005, Jan. 2005.
[8] Foster, I. and Kesselman, C., The Grid: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure, Publisher: Morgan Kaufmann Inc,
1999. ISBN: 1-555860-475-8.
[9] Sung Lee, Taowei David Wang, Nada Hashmi, Michael P. Cummings, “Bio-STEER: A Semantic Web workflow tool for Grid
computing in the life sciences,” Future Generation Computer Systems, Volume 23, Issue 3, March 2007, Pages 497-509.
[10] Kenneth J. Turner, Koon Leai Larry Tan, “Rigorous development of composite grid services”, Journal of Network and
Computer Applications, Volume 35, Issue 4, July 2012, Pages 1304-1316.
[11] Tai-hoon Kim, Wai-chi Fang, “Special section: Grid/distributed computing systems security”, Future Generation
Computer Systems, Volume 25, Issue 3, March 2009, Page 351.
karamollah Bagherifard, Mehrbakhsh Nilashi, Othman Ibrahim, Norafida Ithnin, and Lasisi Ayodele Nojeem
ISSN : 2028-9324 Vol. 2 No. 3, Mar. 2013 237
[12] Simone A. Ludwig, S.M.S. Reyhani, “Semantic approach to service discovery in a Grid environment”, Web Semantics:
Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, Volume 4, Issue 1, January 2006, Pages 1-13.
[13] H. Kevser Sunercan, M. Nedim Alpdemir, Nihan Kesim Cicekli, “A systematic approach to the integration of overlapping
partitions in service-oriented data grids”, Future Generation Computer Systems, Volume 27, Issue 6, June 2011, Pages
667-680.
[14] Antonios Litke, Kleopatra Konstanteli, Vassiliki Andronikou, Sotirios Chatzis, Theodora Varvarigou, “Managing service
level agreement contracts in OGSA-based Grids”, Future Generation Computer Systems, Volume 24, Issue 4, April
2008, Pages 245-258.
[15] Fei You, Qingxi Hu, Yuan Yao, Gaochun Xu, Minglun Fang, “study on web service matching and composition based on
ontology,” Computer Science and Information Engineering, 2009 WRI World Congress Volume: 4.
[16] Jiehan Zhou, Pakkala, D., Perala, J., Niemela, E., Riekki, J., Ylianttila, M., “Dependency-aware Service Oriented
Architecture and Service Composition”, Web Services, 2007. ICWS 2007. IEEE International Conference.
[17] Min Liu, Weiming Shen, Qi Hao, Junwei Yan, “An weighted ontology-based semantic similarity algorithm for web
service,” Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 36, Issue 10, December 2009, Pages 12480-12490.
[18] Franz Baader, Diego Calvanese, Deborah McGuinness, Daniele Nardi, and Peter Patel-Schneider, editors. The
Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[19] David Sánchez, Montserrat Batet, David Isern, Aida Valls, “Ontology-based semantic similarity: A new feature-based
approach”, Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 39, Issue 9, July 2012, Pages 7718-7728.
[20] Xin Dong, Alon Halevy, Jayant Madhavan, Ema Nemes, Jun Zhang, “Similarity Search for Web Services”, Proceedings
2004 VLDB Conference, 2004, Pages 372-383.
[21] David Loshin, “10 - Metadata and Data Standards”, The Practitioner's Guide to Data Quality Improvement, 2011, Pages
167-189.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com