Buradasınız

Ontolojik Özneden Etik “Ben”e

From the Ontological Subject to the Ethical “I”

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study focuses on Emmanuel Levinas’s ethical metaphysics, which gives priority to ethics over traditional Western philosophical approaches that begin first with ontology, the knowledge of being. Because ontology, as knowledge or the theory of being, includes an epistemology at the beginning, and every question about being requires an epistemology, Levinas’s conception of ontology cannot be separated from its epistemological implications. By all means, the Levinasian critique of Western philosophy is not merely a critique and an analysis of ontology and epistemology in a neutral style, but it shows that every ontological question about being fails to recognize the very ethical relation and depends upon an egoistic relation of the Self to the Other. According to Levinas, based upon human reason, the ontological or epistemological approaches of Western philosophy have not only failed to recognize the Other but reduced the Other to the Self. Contrary to Western philosophical approaches, Levinas finds the possibility of real ethical relation to the Other in the face-to-face relationship with the Other, in which the face of the Other awakens the Self.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma, hareket noktası olarak öncelikle ontolojiyi, yani varlığın bilgisini alan geleneksel Batı felsefesine ait yaklaşımlar karşısında, etiğe öncelik tanıyan Levinas’ın etik metafiziğine odaklanmaktadır. Varlığın bilgisi veya teorisi olarak ontoloji, daha başlangıcında, bir epistemoloji içerdiğinden ve varlık hakkındaki her soruşturma bir epistemolojiyi gerektirdiğinden dolayı, Levinas’ın ontoloji kavrayışı da epistemolojik imalarından ayrılamaz. Şüphesiz ki, Levinas’ın Batı felsefesi eleştirisi sadece tarafsız bir tarz içerisinde gerçekleştirilen bir ontoloji ve epistemoloji analizi veya eleştirisi değildir, fakat o, varlığa dair her ontolojik soruşturmanın, hakiki etik ilişkiyi takdir etmede başarısızlığa uğradığını ve Benin Ötekine yönelik egoistik ilişkisine dayandığını göstermeye matuftur. Levinas’a gore, Batı felsefesinin, insan aklına dayanan ontolojik veya epistemolojik yaklaşım tarzları, sadece Ötekini takdir etmede başarısızlığa uğramazlar, fakat aynı zamanda Ötekini Ben’e indirgerler. Batının felsefî yaklaşımlarına karşıt bir biçimde, Levinas, Ötekiyle kurulacak olan gerçek etik ilişkinin imkânını, Ötekinin yüzünün Beni ayıltıp, farkına varmasını sağladığı, Ötekiyle gerçekleştirilen yüzyüze ilişki içerisinde bulur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
42-50

REFERENCES

References: 

BURGGRAEVE, Roger, (2002) The Wisdom of Love in the Service of Love, (Translation
and Concluding Essay by Jeffrey Bloechl), Marquette University Press, Milwaukee.
COHEN, Richard A., (2006) “Translator’s Introductions: Better than Being”, in
Emmanuel Levinas, Ethics and Infinity: Conversation with Philippe Nemo, (Translated by
Richard A. Cohen), Duquesne University Press, Pittsburg.
DERRIDA, Jacques, (1980) “Violence and Metaphysics An essay on the Thought of
Emmanuel Levinas”, Writing and Difference (Translated by Alan Bass), University of Chicago
Press, Chicago.
DIREK, Zeynep, (2005) “Sunuş”, Emmanuel Levinas, Zaman ve Başka, (Translated by
Özkan Gözel), Metis Yayınları, İstanbul.
LEVINAS, Emmanuel, (1966a) “Signature”, Philosophy Today, 10:1 (1966: Spring).
LEVINAS, Emmanuel, (1966b) “On the Trail of the Other”, (Translated by Daniel J.
Hoy) Philosophy Today, 10:1 (1966: Spring).
LEVINAS, Emmanuel, (1969) Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (Translated
by Alphonso Lingis), Duquesne University Press, Pennsylvania.
LEVINAS, Emmanuel, (1989) “Ethics as First Philosophy”, in Levinas Reader (ed. Seán
Hand), Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.
LEVINAS, Emmanuel, (1995) “Ethics of the Infinite”, in States of Mind: Dialogues with
Contemporary Thinkers (ed. Richard Kearney), Manchester University Press, Manchester.
LEVINAS, Emmanuel, (1996) “Is Ontology Fundamental?”, in Basic Philosophical
Writings (ed. Adriaan T. Peperzak, Simon Critchley and Robert Bernasconi), Indiana University
Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.
LEVINAS, Emmanuel, (2001a) “The Awakening of the I”, Is It Righteous to Be?
Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas (ed. Jill Robins), Stanford University Press.
LEVINAS, Emmanuel, (2006a) “Face” in Ethics and Infinity: Conversation with Philippe
Nemo, (Translated by Richard A. Cohen), Duquesne University Press, Pittsburg.
LEVINAS, Emmanuel, (2006b) “Responsibility for the Other”, in Ethics and Infinity:
Conversation with Philippe Nemo, (Translated by Richard A. Cohen), Duquesne University Press,
Pittsburg.
LEVINAS, Emmanuel, (2006c) “Secrecy and Freedom”, in Ethics and Infinity:
Conversation with Philippe Nemo, (Translated by Richard A. Cohen), Duquesne University Press,
Pittsburg 2006.
LEVINAS, Emmanuel, (2006d) “The Solitude of Being”, in Ethics and Infinity:
Conversation with Philippe Nemo, (Translated by Richard A. Cohen), Duquesne University Press,
Pittsburg.
LEVINAS, Emmanuel, (2001b) “The Other Utopia and Justice”, Is It Righteous to Be?
Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas, (ed. Jill Robins), Stanford University Press.
LUMSDEN, Simon, (2000) “Absolute Difference and Social Ontology: Levinas Face to
Face with Buber and Fichte”, Human Studies, 23, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Netherlands, pp.
227–241.
From the Ontological Subject to the Ethical “I”
50 2009/13
SARACINO, Michele, (2004) “Subject for the Other: Lonergan and Levinas on Being
Human in Postmodernity”, In Deference to the Other Lonergan and Contemporary Continental
Thought, (ed. Jim Kanaris and Mark J. Doorley), State University of New York Press, New York.
SARUP, Madan, (1996) Identity Culture and the Postmodern World, (ed. Tasneem Raja),
Edinburg University Press, Edinburg.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com