Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND NEGATIVE ATTITUDE AGAINST EMPLOYEE MONITORING

Journal Name:

  • Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Knowledge sharing in an organization is an important part of knowledge management and its success or failure will be directly related to how much knowledge could be used by employees. Unfortunately there are some de-motivators in work environment that prevent employees to share knowledge with each others. This paper intends to interrogate employee monitoring as one of the de-motivators of knowledge sharing in organizations. In an insecure work environment where employee behaviors are monitored employees may not intend to share their knowledge with others because of confidentiality, job insecuri ty, mistrust. Therefore, the aim of this research is to examine the relationship between organizational knowledge sharing and employee monitoring. Employees who have negative attitude against employee monitoring complained that the implementation of electronic monitoring in their workplace caused paced work, lack of involvement, reduced task variety and clarity, reduced peer social support, reduced supervisory support, fear of job loss, routinized work activity, and lack of control over tasks. It is assumed that there is a relationship between negative attitudes against employee monitoring and knowledge sharing in organizations. This empirical research is realized by surveying 122 employees in banking sector. In this study, with inspiration taken from the related studies in literature, the relationship between two variables was tried to be identified by conducting required statistical analysis of questionnaires applied to employees.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_91824_7_pp_93-100.pdf
  • 2
93-100
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Aiello, J. (1993). Computer-based work monitoring: Electronic surveillance and its effects. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, 23(7), 499-507.
Alder, S. (1998). Ethical issues in electronic performance monitoring: A consideration of deontological and
teleological perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(7), 729-743.
Alge, B. J., Greenberg, J. & Brinsfield, C. T. (2006). An identity based model of organizational monitoring:
Integrating information privacy and organizational justice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources
Management, 25, 71-135.
Barutçugil, İ. (2002). Bilgi Yönetimi, Kariyer Yayınları, İstanbul.
Bennet, C. S. & S. D. Locke. (1998). Privacy in the Workplace, Labor Law Journal, 49(1), 781-787.
Bradley J. A. G. Ballinger & S. G. Green. (2004). Remote Control: predictors Of Electronic Monitoring Intensity
and Secrecy, Personnel Psychology, 57(2), 377-410.
Chalykoff, J., & Kochan, T. A. (1989). Computer-aided Monitoring: Its Influence on Employee Job Satisfaction
And Turnover, Personnel Psychology, 42(4), 807-834
Chowdhury, N. (2006). Building Knowledge Management in Malaysia. Inside Knowledge, 9(7). [online]:
http://www.km4dev.org/index.php/articles/news/744.
D’Urso, S. C. (2006). Who’s Watching Us at Work? Toward A Structural Model of Electronic Monitoring and
Surveillance in Organizations. Communication Theory, 16(3), 281-303.
Davenport, T., H., Long, D.W. & Beers, M.C. (1998). Successful Knowledge Management Projects, Sloan
Management Review, (39)2, 43-57.
Demirel, Y. & Seçkin, Z. (2011). Örgütsel Adaletin Bilgi Paylaşımı Üzerine Etkisi: İlaç Sektörü Çalışanlarına
Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Bilig, 56, 99- 119.
Erdemir, E. (2008). Bilgi Toplumunda Çalışma İlişkilerinin Yeni Boyutu: İşyeri ve Çalışanlara Yönelik İzleme
Faaliyetleri ve Türkiye’deki Durum, 1. Ulusal Çalışma İlişkileri Kongresi: Sakarya Üniversitesi Bildiriler
Kitabı, 39-52.
Erdemir, E., Çeliktaş, I., (2006). Örgütsel ve Hukuki Açıdan İşyeri İzleme: Karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme Kazanç
Hakemli Hukuk Dergisi, (19-20), 87-102.
Erdemir, E. ve U. Koç (2006). Büyük Patron Sizi İzliyor! Farklı Sektörlerde İşyeri İzleme Aracı Olarak Yeni
Teknolojilerin Kullanımı: Eskişehir Örneği, 5. Orta Anadolu İşletmecilik Kongresi, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa
Üniversitesi, Bildiriler Kitabı, 141-148.
Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi / 2012 Cilt: VII Sayı: II
Tüm hakları BEYDER’e aittir 101 All rights reserved by The JKEM
Findlay, P., A. McKinlay, A. Marks & P. Thompson (2000). In Search of Perfect People: Teamwork and Team
Players in the Scottish Spirits Industry, Human Relations, 53(12), 1549–1571.
George, J. F. (1996). Computer-based Monitoring: Common Perceptions and Empirical Results, MIS Quarterly,
20(4), 459-480.
Guffey C. J. & J. F. West. (1996). Employee Privacy: Legal Implications for Managers, Labor Law Journal,
21(2), 735-745.
Hoffman, W. M., Hartman, L. P., Rowe, M. (2003). You’ve Got Mail . . . And the Boss Knows: A Survey by the
Center for Business Ethics of Companies’ Email and Internet Monitoring. Business and Society Review, 108(3),
285-307.
Hovorka-Mead., A., Ross, W.H., Whipple, T. & Renchin, M.B. (2002). Watching The Detectives: Seasonal
Student Employee Reactions to Electronic Monitoring with and without Advance Notification. Personnel
Psychology, 55(2), 329-362.
Huber, P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures, London,
Organizations Science, 2(1), 88-115
Ibragimova, B. (2006). Propensity for Knowledge Sharing: An Organizational Justice Perspective. Ph.D. Thesis.
USA: University of North Texas.
Martin, K. & Freeman, R.E. (2003). Some Problems with Employee Monitoring, Journal of Business Ethics,
43(4), 353-361.
Marx, G., T. & Sherizen S. (1987). Corporations that spy on their employees. Business and Society Review, No.
60 (Winter), 32-37.
McNall, L.A. & Roch,S.G. (2007). Effects of Electronic Monitoring Types on Perceptions of Procedural Justice,
Interpersonal Justice, and Privacy, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(3), 658-682.
Nolan, D.R. (2003). Privacy and Profitability in the Technological Workplace, Journal of Labor Research, 24,
Part 2, 207-232.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1994).A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization
Science, 5(1), 14-37.
Nussbaum K, (1989). Computer monitoring: A threat to the right to privacy? CPSR Annual Meeting,
Washington, DC.
Nussbaum, K. & du Rivage, V. (1986). Computer monitoring: Mismanagement by remote control. Business and
Society Review, 56, 16–20
Oye, N.D.; Mazleena S. & Noorminshah, A. (2011). Knowledge Sharing in Workplace: Motivators and
Demotivators. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 3(4), 71-84.
Oz E., Glass, R. & R. Behling. (1999). Electronic Workplace Monitoring: What Employees Think? Omega,
27(2), 167-177.
Rogers, K.S., Smith, M.J., & Sainfort, P.C. (1990). Electronic performance monitoring, job design, and
psychological stress. In Proceedings of the human factors society 34th annual meeting, 845-858.
Smith, M.; Carayon, P.; Sanders, K.; Lim, S.-Y., & Le Grande, D. (1992). Employee stress and health
complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring. Applied Ergonomics, 23(1), 17-27.
Stanton, J. M. & E. M. Weiss. (2000). Electronic monitoring in their own words: an exploratory study of
employees' experiences with new types of surveillance, Computers in Human Behavior, 16(4), 423-440.
Tabak, F. & Smith, W.P. (2005). Privacy and electronic monitoring in the workplace: A model of managerial
cognition and relational trust development. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(3), 173-189.
The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management / Volume: VII FALL
Tüm hakları BEYDER’e aittir 102 All rights reserved by The JKEM
Townsend A. M. & J. T. Bennett. (2003). Privacy, Technology, and Conflict: Emerging Issues and Action in
Workplace Privacy. Journal of Labor Research, 24(2), 195-205.
Vaught, B., C,, Taylor, R., E. & Vaught, S., E. (2000). The attitudes of managers regarding the electronic
monitoring of employee behavior: Procedural and ethical considerations. American Business Review, 18(1), 107-114

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com