Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Aile Hekimliğinin akademik katkısı Aile Hekimliği Araştırma Günleri, İzmir, Türkiye

Family Medicine's academic contributions Family Medicin e Research Days, İzmir, Turkey

Journal Name:

  • Türkiye Aile Hekimliği Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this paper which is mainly based on my speech in the Family Medicine Research Days, izmir, Turkey, in November, 2012, I have tried to place family medicine in the wider landscape of academic medicine and provide some sense of how it has grown in its own right as an academic discipline with unique contributions to provide. In order to understand the unique contributions of Family Medicine, I have first explained two concepts that will help to build a framework to understand where we fit into the larger academy of medicine. Following that I have presented some further details of the specific contributions of academic Family Medicine and concluded with what I see as some key challenges ahead. As an academic discipline, it has established a firm foundation over the past 40 years.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Esas olarak Kasım 2012'de izmir, Türkiye'de gerçekleştirilen Aile Hekimliği Araştırma Günleri'nde yaptığım konuşmamın yer aldığı bu ya¬zıda, aile hekimliğinin genel akademik tıp içindeki yerini saptamaya ve sağladığı akademik katkılar ile özünde akademik bir disiplin olarak nasıl geliştiği hakkında bir parça bilinç oluşturmaya çalıştım. Aile he¬kimliğinin kendine özgü katkısını anlayabilmek amacı ile önce genel akademik tıp içinde nerede yer aldığımızı anlamamız yolunda bir çerçeve oluşturacak iki temel kavramı açıkladım. Bunun ardından aile hekimliğinin özgün akademik katkılarının ayrıntılarını sundum ve bi¬zi beklediğini düşündüğüm bazı zorluklardan söz ettim. Aile hekim¬liği, akademik bir disiplin olarak, geride bıraktığımız 40 yılda sağlam temeller inşa etmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_116859_16_pp_181-198.pdf
  • 4
181-198
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Reiser SJ. Technological medicine: the changing world of doctors and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 131.
2. Flexner A. Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Bulletin No. 4., New York City: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Bulletin number Four (1910)
3. Osler W. The principles and practice of medicine: designed for the use of practitioners and students in medicine. New York: D. Appleton and Company; 1892.
4. Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Vol. 2, Number 2. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1962.
5. oss L. The challenge to biomedicine. J Med Philos 1989;14:165-91.
6. Moerman DE. Placebo effects in the treatment of ulcer disease. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 1983;14:3.
7. Rana J, Mannam A, Donnel-Fink L, et al. Longevity of the placebo effect in the therapeutic angiogenesis and laser myocardial revasculaturization trials in patients with coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol2005:95:1456-
9.
8. Kirsch I, Deacon BJ, Huedo-Medina TB, Scoboria A, Moore TJ, Johnson BT. Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. PLoS Med 2008;5:e45.
9. Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL. Unconventional medicine in the United States. N Engl J
Med 1993;328:246.
10. McWhinney I R. General practice as an academic discipline: reflections after a visit to the United States. Lancet 1966:19:419.
11. Culpepper L, Becker L. Family medicine research: two decades of devel¬oping its base. In: Doherty WJ, Christianson CE, Sussman MB, editors. Family medicine: the maturing of a discipline. New York, NY: The
Howarth Press; 1987.
12. Davies R. Can a doctor be a humanist? In: The Merry Heart: Selections
1980-1995. Toronto, ON: McClelland and Stewart; 1996.
13. Toulmin S. Return to reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press;
2003.
14. Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston W, McWhinney I, McWilliam C,
Freeman T. Patient-centered medicine: transforming the clinical method. 2nd ed. Oxon: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2003.
15. http://nationalphysiciansurvey.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/2010-Nation...
16. Nicholson P. Information-rich and attention-poor. Globe and Mail
2009;September 9.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com