Buradasınız

İlköğretim öğrencilerinin yaşam kalitesinin toplumsal sınıf değişkeni açısından incelenmesi: Aydın ilinde betimsel bir çalışma

Assessment of the quality of life for school children in context of social class reality: a descriptive study in Aydın

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The main purpose of this study is to examine 4th and 5th grade childrens’ quality of life in terms of their social class indicators. Child’s Quality of Life Inventory was used as a data gathering tool in this study. Data were obtained from the study was analyzed in accordance to information about schools’ social economic statues that gathered from The National Education Directorship in Aydın. Number, percentage, frequency, and chi square were used as a statistical method in present study. The finding of the study shows that life quality of children could be mainly revealed with socio economic statues of them. Also the study reveals the most of the children from low socio economic statue are working as a child laborfor contributing to the family budget. The most of the families involved in the study explained that they were willing to send their children to the school after the compulsory elementary education. Beside of this finding, some of the families in the sample % 11,9 (n=16) stated that they were reluctant to send their children to the school after the elementary education. The finding of the study can be considered in terms of public health, school health and general well-being statue of the children in Turkey.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın temel amacı Aydın İlinde, ilköğretim 4. ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin yaşam kalitesinin sosyo-ekonomik düzey açısından incelenmesidir. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen “Çocuk Yaşam Kalitesi Tarama Envanteri” kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada elde edilen veriler, Aydın İl Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü’nden alınan bilgiler doğrultusunda belirlenen alt, orta ve üst sosyoekonomik düzeylerden toplam 6 ilköğretim okulunun 4. ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinden toplanarak bu veriler üzerinde sayı, yüzde, frekans ve ki kare analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın bulguları, çocuk yaşam kalitesinin büyük oranda sosyo-ekonomik düzey ile açıklanabileceğini göstermektedir. Alt sosyoekonomik düzeyden çocuklar okul dışında gelir getirici bir iş yaparak aile bütçesine katkıda bulunmaktadırlar. Sosyo-ekonomik düzeyi ne olursa olsun ailelerin çoğunluğu çocuklarının eğitimlerine ilköğretimden sonra da devam etmelerini isterken, alt sosyo-ekonomik düzeydeki okullara devam eden öğrenci ailelerinin %11,9 (n=16)’u “çocuğunun ilköğretimden sonra eğitimine devam etmemesini istemektedir. Tüm bu bulgular, toplum sağlığı, okul sağlığı ve çocuğun genel iyi olma durumu üzerine önemli önlemleri gerekli kılmaktadır.
1379-1400

REFERENCES

References: 

Behrman, J. (1997). Mothers’ schooling and child education: A survey, PIER working paper 97-
025, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
Bradley RH, Kelleher KJ. (1992). Childhood morbidity and mortality: the growing impact of social factors.
Presented at Conf. Social Sci. Health Policy: Building Bridges Between Research and
Action,Washington, DC.
Bloom B. (1964). Stability and Change in Human Characteristics. New York: Wiley.
Cassady C, Farel A, Guild P, Kennelly J, People-Sheps M, et al. (1997). Maternal and Child Health
Model Indicators.Washington, DC: Maternal Child Health Bur., US Dep. Health Human
Serv.
Cummins, R. A. (1997). Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale – School Version (Grades 7-12) (Comqol-S5)
Manual. Fifth Edition. School of Psychology, Deakin University: Melbourne.
Crooks D. (1995). American children at risk: poverty and its consequences for children’s health,
growth, and school achievement, Yearbook of Physical. Anthropology. 38:57–86.
Çivitci, A. (2007). Çokboyutlu öğrenci yaşam doyumu ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik
ve güvenirlik çalışmaları [The Adaptation of Multidimensional Students’ Life Satisfaction
Scale into Turkish: Validity and Reliability Studies]. Eğitim Araştırmaları-Eurasian Journal of
Educational Research 26, p. 51-60.
DeGarmo DS, Forgatch MS, Martinez CR. (1999). Parenting of divorced mothers as a link
between social status and boys’ academic outcomes: unpacking the effects of
socioeconomic status. Child Development. 70: p. 1231–45.
Ditesheim JA, Templeton JM Jr.(2007). Short-term and long-term quality of life in children
following repair of high imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg., 22: p.581-7.
Markus J. Ege, M.D., Melanie Mayer, Ph.D., Anne-Cécile Normand, Ph.D., Jon Genuneit, M.D.,
William O.C.M. Cookson, M.D., D.Phil., Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer, M.D., Dick
Heederik, Ph.D., Renaud Piarroux, M.D., Ph.D., and Erika von Mutius, M.D. for the
GABRIELA Transregio 22 Study Group, The New England Journal of Medicine, 364:701-709.
Escalona, S. (1982). Babies at double hazard: Early development of infants at biologic and social
risk. Pediatrics 70: p.670–75.
Hornberg, C. & Pauli, A. (2007). Child poverty and environmental justice, International Journal of
Hygiene and Environmental Health, 571-580.
Johnston, A., Ganzeboom, H. & Treiman, D. (2005). Mothers’ and fathers’ influences on
educational attainment, verbal presentation, RC28 Conference, Oslo, Norway.
Korrupp, S., Ganzeboom, H. & Van Der Lippe, T. (2002). Do mathers matter? A comparison of
models of the influence of mothers’ and fathers’ educational and occupational status on
childrens’ educational attainment, Quality and Quantity, 36, p. 17-42.
Paulsen EK, Friedman LS, Myers LM, Lynch DR. (2010). Health-related quality of life in children
with Friedreich ataxia, Pediatric Neurolgy. , 42(5):335-7.
Evci Kiraz, E. D., Akar Vural, R., Yılmaz Özelçi, S., Vural, T. ve Ergin, F. (2013). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin yaşam
kalitesinin toplumsal sınıf değişkeni açısından incelenmesi: Aydın ilinde betimsel bir çalışma. International Journal
of Human Sciences, 10(1), 1379-1400.
1399
Spilker (1996). Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials [2nd ed]. Philadelphia:
Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
McCall RB. (1981). Nature-nurture and the two realms of development: a proposed integration
with respect to mental development. Child Development. 52: p.1–12.
Mutius, V. E., & Radon, K. (2008). Living on a farm: impact on asthma induction and clinical
course, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America, 28(3), p.631-647.
Kramer MS. (1987). Determinants of low birthweight: methodological assessment and metaanalysis.
Bulletin. WHO 65: p.663–737.
Rueden, U. V., Gosch, A., Rajmil, L., Bisegger, C. & Ravens-Sieberer. (2006). Socioeconomiv
determinants of health related quality of life in childhood and adolescence: results from a
European study, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60: p. 130-135.
RushingWA, Ortega ST. (1979). Socioeconomic status and mental disorder: newevidence and a
sociomedical formulation. American Journal of Sociology, 84: p.1175–200.
Scarr, S. & Weinberg, R.A. (1978). The influence of “family background” on intellectual
attainment, American Sociological. Review. 43: p. 674–92.
Sarı, M., Cenkseven, F. (2008). İlköğretim öğrencilerinde okul yaşam kalitesi ve benlik kavramı,
Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 5:2. Erişim: http://www.insanbilimleri.com.
Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
UNICEF, (1991). The state of the world’s children, Oxford: Oxford University Press. ILO,
International Labor Organization (1996). Economically Active Populations, 1950–2010,
Geneva.
Varni, J. W., Limbers, C. A. & Burwinkle, T. M. (2007). Impaired health-related quality of life in
children and adolescents with chronic conditions: a comparative analysis of 10 disease
clusters and 33 disease categories/severities utilizing the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core
Scales, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, p.5-43.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com