Buradasınız

Placement of students to high school in Turkey: Factors affecting student achievement in placement tests

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The objective of the research is to identify factors that affect the degree the most successful and the most unsuccessful ten students get at their class levels and in their dwelling units in “Level Determination Examination” which is a form of placement test held at provincial levels in allocation of students from elementary to secondary education. The research was conducted in Sakarya Province. The sample of the research comprised of 420 6th, 7th and 8th grade students in total who ranked among the first and the last 10 groups in dwelling units in the examination held at provincial level. It was ascertained that 82% (Nagelkerke R2 = 0.82) of student’s ranking among the first most successful or the last most unsuccessful group of ten people in their own dwelling unit and at their own class level in the Placement Test could be predicted by TE, PA, BÇG, BY, SİD and Ç factors according to Stepwise logistic regression analysis. AKD, AİFK and AO are the variables which were not found to be meaningful in the last regression equation.
857-877

REFERENCES

References: 

Akın, A. (2006). “2x2 başarı yönelimleri ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması”, [2x2
achievement goal orientations scale: validity and reliability study], Sakarya
Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, 1 – 14.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structuresa, and student motivation. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
Aypay, A. (2003). The tough choice at high school door: an ınvestigation of the factors that
lead students to general or vocational schools. International Journal of Educational
Devolopment 23, 5: 517-527.
Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society (2nd ed.). Oxford, U.K.: Basil
Blackwell.
Chakraborty, J. and Bosman, M. M. (2005). Measuring the digital divide in the united states:
race, income, and personal computer ownership, The Professional Geographer, 57
(3), 395–410.
Coleman. J. S. and E. Q. Campbell, C. J. Hobson. J. McPartland. A. M. Mood. F. D.
Weinfeld and R. L. York (1966) Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington,
D.C.: U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare. OE-38001.
Dağ İ (1991) Rotter’in iç-dış kontrol odağı ölçeği (RİDKOÖ) nin üniversite öğrencileri için
güvenirliği ve geçerliği, [Validity and reliability of Rotter’s locus of control scale
(RİDKOÖ) for university students], Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(26):10-16.
Dupriez, V. and Dumay, X. (2006), ınequalities in school systems: effect of school structure
or of society structure?, Comparative Education, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 243–260.
Fejgin, N. (1995). Factors contributing to the academic excellence of American Jewish and
Asian students. Sociology of Education, 68(1), 18 – 30.
Ganzach, Y. (2000). Parent’s education, cognitive ability, educational expectations and
educational attainment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 419 – 441.
Grob, Martin. (2003). Educational systems and perceived social inequality: the institutional
base of class formation. European Societies 5(2) : 193-225.
Irving, L. (2001).“Falling Through the Net: Introductıon” Retrieved May 9 2009 from
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ ntiahome/fttn99/ intoduction.html. 07.05.2001.
Jagacinski, C. M., & Strickland, O. J. (2000). Task and ego orientation the role of goal
orientations in anticipated affective reactions to achievement outcomes. Learning
and Individual Differences, 12, 189-208.
Gündüz, H., B. (2010). Placement of students to high school in Turkey: Factors affecting student achievement
in placement tests. International Journal of Human Sciences [Online]. 7:1. Available:
http://www.insanbilimleri.com/en
876
Karslı M.D & Gündüz, H.B. (2002). Fırsat eşitliği açısından dijital bölünme ve türkiye’deki
durum, [Digital division in respect of equal opportunity and the case in Turkey],
Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. Sayı: 4.
Kotkin, J. (2000). The New Geography: How The Digital Revolution is Reshaping the
American Landscape. New York: Random House.
Lucas, S. R. (2001) Effectively maintained inequality: education transitions, track mobility,
and social background effects, American Journal of Sociology, 106, 6: 1642 -90.
Marks, G. N., J. Cresswell, and J. Ainley. (2006). Explaining socioeconomic inequalities in
student achievement: the role of home and school factors. Educational Research and
Evaluation Vol. 12, No. 2, April 2006, pp. 105 – 128.
Mc Connaughey, J.W. (2001) “Falling Through the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide
National Telecommunications and İnformation Administration” http.//www.
ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/ net2/failing.html. 07,05,2001.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M., Urdan, T., Anderman, L., Anderman,
E., &Roeser, R. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing
students’ achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23,
113-131.
Orr, A. J. (2003). Black-white differences in achievement: The importance of wealth.
Sociology of Education, 76 (4), 281 – 304.
Pintrich, P. R., Conley, A. M., & Kempler, T. M. (2003). Current issues in achievement goal
theory and research. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 319–337.
Reyes, X. A. (2010). Educational equity and access as universal human rights: effects on
teacher education in the U.S. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences,
2 (1), 1-20.
Pong, S.-L., & Ju, D.-B. (2000). The effects of change in family structure and income on
dropping out of middle and high school. Journal of Family Issues, 21(2), 147 – 167.
Rose, M. (2001). “Bridging the Digital Divide” http://wilsontxt.hwilson.com/
pdfhtml/04575/1ZWY4/ DFX .htm. 07.05.2001.
Rotter. J. B. (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of
reinforcements. Psychological Monographs, ,80,1-28.
Schreiber, J. B. (2002). Institutional and student factors and their influence on
advanced mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 274 –
286.
Shavit, Y. and Blossfeld H.P. (1993). Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational
Attainment in Thirteen Countries. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Solmuş, T. (2004). İş yaşamı, denetim odağı ve beş faktörlük kişilik modeli, [Business life,
supervision focus and personality model of five factors], Türk Psikoloji Bülteni, 10,
196-205.
Strauser, D. R., Ketz, K. & Keim, J. (2002). The relationship between self- efficacy, locus of
control and work personality. Journal of Rehabilitation, 68,20-26.
Gündüz, H., B. (2010). Placement of students to high school in Turkey: Factors affecting student achievement
in placement tests. International Journal of Human Sciences [Online]. 7:1. Available:
http://www.insanbilimleri.com/en
877
Taylor, S. E., Peplau, A. L., & Sears, D. O. (2006). Social Psychology (12th ed.).Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Teachman, J. D. (1987). Family background, educational resources, and educational
attainment, American Sociological Review, 52, 548 – 557.
Tebliğler Dergisi (2007). Ortaöğretim Kurumlarına Geçiş Yönergesi [Direction on Access to
the Secondary Schools]. Sayı 2604.
Turner, Ralph H. (1971) ‘A typology for the classification of educational systems’, in Earl
Hopper (ed) Readings In The Theory Of Educational Systems,UK Hutchinson &Co
(publishers) Ltd, 71 -90.
Yüksel G. (2004) ‘Öğrenme için motivasyon’,[ Motivation for learning ], in Erçetin and
Özdemir (eds) Sınıf Yönetimi, [Classroom Management], Asil Yayın Dağıtım Ltd.
Şti. Ankara.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com