Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics
Teacher Education, 3(3), 205–224.
Ball, D. L., & D. K. Cohen (1996). Reform by the book: What is — or might be — the role of curriculum
materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher 25(9), 6-8.
Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. (1996).
Mathematics achievement in middle school years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and
Science Study (TIMSS). Boston, MA: Centre for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational
Policy, Boston College.
Brown, M. W. (2009). The Teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum
materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics
teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp.17-36). New
York: Routledge.
Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook
affected two teachers’ learning. Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 287–311.
Cohen, D., Raudenbush, S., & Ball, D. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational
Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119-142.
Dinçer, B., Özaslan, M., & Kavasoğlu, T.(2003), İllerin ve bölgelerin sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik
siralamasi araştırması 2003, Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Yayınları.
Doerr, H. M., & Chandler-Olcott, K. (2009). Negotiating the literacy demands ofstandards-based
curriculum materials:A site for teachers’ learning. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, &
G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and
classroom instruction (pp.283-301). New York: Routledge.
Durwin, C. C., & Sherman, W. M. (2008). Does choice of college textbook make a difference in students’
comprehension? College Teaching, 56(1), 28-34.
Eisenmann, T., & Even, R. (2009). Similarities and differences in the types of algebraic activities in two
classes taught by the same teacher. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd
(Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom
instruction (pp. 152-170). New York: Routledge.
Fan, L. ,Chen, J., Zhu, Y. Qiu, X., & Hu, J. (2004). Textbook use within and beyond mathematics
classrooms: A study of 12 secondary schools in Kunming and Fuzhou of China. In L. Fan, N. Y.
Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders
(pp.228-262). Singapore: World Scientific.
Haggarty, L. & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English,
French and German Classrooms: Who Gets an Opportunity to Learn What? British Educational
Research Journal, 28(4): 567-590.
Lloyd, G. M., Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Remillard, J. T. (2005). Researching teachers’ use of
mathematics curriculum materials: Advancing the research agenda. In G. M. Lloyd, M. Wilson,
J.L. M. Wilkins, & S. L. Behm (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the North
American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
[CDROM]. Eugene, OR: All Academic.
Özgeldi, M. (2012). Middle school mathematics teachers’ use of textbooks and integration of textbook
tasks into practice: A mixed methods study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Middle East
Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for
examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315–342.
Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula.
Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
Remillard, J. T. (2009). Considering what we know about the relationship between teachers and
curriculum material. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.),
Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction
(pp.85-92). New York: Routledge.Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers’ orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials:
Implications for teacher learning. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352–388.
Robitaille, D. F. & Travers, K.T. (1992).International studies of achievement in mathematics. In Douglas
A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 687-709).
NY: Macmillan Publishing Co.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C.C., & Raizen, S. A. (2002). A splintered vision: An investigation of U.S.
science and mathematics education. New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow, Kluwer
Academic Publishers.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C.C., Valverde, G.A., Houang, R.T., & Wiley, D.E. (1997). Many visions,
many aims: cross-national invention of curricular intentions in school mathematics (Vol. 1),
Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2004). Identifying patterns in teachers’ use of a reform-based elementary
mathematics curriculum. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Stein, M. K., & Kim, G. (2009). The role of mathematics curriculum materials in large-scale urban reform.
In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at
work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp.37-55). New York:
Routledge.
Törnroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in
Educational Evaluation, 31(4): 315–327.
Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the
book. Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of
textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
