Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

The Factors that Mediate Preservice Science Teachers’ Understanding of Nature of Science

The Factors that Mediate Preservice Science Teachers’ Understanding of Nature of Science

Journal Name:

  • Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of the study is to explore the factors that mediate preservice science teachers’ (PSTs) understanding of nature of science (NOS). This study was conducted during the Laboratory Application in Science II course and totally 50 PSTs joined the study voluntarily. The laboratory course was designed under the inquiry-based instruction. The design of the study was qualitative and exploratory in nature. During the semester, reflection papers were collected to understand PSTs’ experiences with the intervention every week. At the end of the semester, semi-structured interviews were conducted to determine the impact of the inquiry-based laboratory instruction. All of the data were analyzed at the end of the semester and determined factors that mediate PSTs’ NOS understanding. Findings revealed that three main factors; discussions and presentations, using inquiry skills, and doing inquiry-based laboratory activities were determined as factors that lead to development of PSTs NOS understanding. Furthermore, intervention also developed PSTs perspectives about teaching NOS
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
İlköğretim Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilimin Doğasını Anlamalarına Etki Eden Faktörler. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilköğretim fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bilimin doğasını anlamalarında hangi faktörlerin etkili olduğunun ortaya çıkarılmasıdır. Bu çalışma Fen Bilgisinde Laboratuar Uygulamaları II dersinde uygulanmış ve toplam 50 fen bilgisi öğretmen adayı çalışmaya gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Laboratuar dersi araştırmacı-sorgulayıcı yöntemle yürütülmüştür. Bu çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Dönem boyunca her hafta öğretmen adaylarının deneyimlerinin ve gelişimlerinin belirlenmesi için yazılı dokümanlar toplandı. Dönemin sonunda araştırmaya dayalı laboratuar öğretiminin etkisini belirlemek için öğretmen adaylarıyla mülakat yapıldı. Verilerin analizi sonucunda üç önemli faktör; laboratuar ortamındaki tartışmalar ve sunumlar, araştırma becerilerinin kullanılması ve araştırmaya dayalı laboratuar etkinliklerinin yapılması öğretmen adaylarının bilimin doğasına yönelik anlayışlarını geliştiren faktörler olarak belirlenmiştir. Son olarak uygulamalar sonrasında öğretmen adaylarının bilimin doğasının öğretimine yönelik algılarının pozitif yönde değiştiği tespit edilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_283_6_pp_60-74.pdf
  • 2
60-74
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science
courses: Abandoning scientism, but…Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 215-233.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Learning as conceptual change: Factors that mediate the
development of preservice elementary teachers‘ views of nature of science. Science Education, 88(5),
785-810.
Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers‘ conceptions of nature of
science a critical review of the literature. Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665-701.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional
practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417-436.
Abruscato, J. (1995). Teaching children science: A discovery approach. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activitybased
approach on elementary teachers‘ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 37(4), 295-317.
Alters, B.J. (1997). Whose Nature of Science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(1), 39-55.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1990). Science for all Americans. New
York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy:
A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bartholomev, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching students 'ideas-about science': Five
dimensions of effective practice. Science Education. 88, 655-682.
Bell, R. (2008). Teaching the nature of science through process skills, Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Bell, R.L., Lederman, N.G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one's conception of
the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 563-581.
Carin, A., Bass, J., & Contant, T. (2005). Methods for teaching science as inquiry. Upper Saddle River,
NJ: Pearson.
Domin, S. D., (2007). Students‘ perceptions of when conceptual development occurs during laboratory
instruction. Chemistry Educational Research and Practice, 8(2), 140-152.
Gabel, D. L., Rubba, P. A., & Franz, J. R. (1977). The effect of early teaching and training experience on
physics achievement, attitudes toward science and science teaching, and process skill proficiency.
Science Education, 61, 503-511.
Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus inquiry-oriented
instruction on sixth graders‘ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39,
551-578.
Lawson, A. E. (1982). The nature of advanced reasoning and science instruction. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 19, 743-760.
LeCompte, M., & Priessle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San
Diego: Academic Press.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the
research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-359.
Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors
that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916-929.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In Abell, S. K., & Lederman, N. G.
(Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831-879). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Ministry of National Education. (2004). Elementary science and technology course curriculum. Ankara,
Turkey: Ministry of Education.National Academy of Sciences. (1998) Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington
DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National
Academic Press.
National Science Teachers Association. (1971). School Science Education for the 1980s. Science-
Technology-Society: An NSTA Position Statement. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers
Association.
National Science Teachers Association. (1982). Science-technology-society: Science education for the
1980s. (An NSTA position statement). Washington, DC: Author.
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington,
DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council (2005). America‘s lab report: Investigations in high school science.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press. http://books.nap.edu/catalog/11311.html (accessed 18
January 2006).
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2002). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific
literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240.
Roth, W. M. (1994). Experimenting in a constructivist high school physics laboratory. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 31, 197–223.
Rowe, M. B. (1974). A humanistic intent: the program of preservice elementary education at the
University of Florida. Science Education, 58, 369-376.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an
authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific
inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 88(4), 610-645.
Schwartz, R.S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Achieving the reforms: The effectiveness
of a specialists-led elementary science program. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 181-193.
Smith, M. U., Lederman, N. G., Bell, R. L., McComas, W. F., & Clough, M. P. (1997). How great is the
disagreement about the nature of science: A Response to aAlters. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 34(10), 1101-1103.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com