Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

TARİHSEL SÜREÇTE GİRİŞİMCİLİK TEORİSİ: GİRİŞİMCİLİĞİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜME VE İSTİHDAM BOYUTU

ENTRPRENEURSHIP THEORY IN HISTORICAL PROGRESS: ECONOMIC GROWTH AND EMPLOYMENT DIMENSIONS OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Journal Name:

  • Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The literature widely acknowledges the significant contribution of entrepreneurship activities into economic growth and employment. Every practice is based on a theory. Entrepreneurship has evolved within the historical progress by taking the economics and society as its basis and improved its theory. In this progress, different approaches of various scholars in economics towards economic issues of the period were quite effective. Improvement of the theory of entrepreneurship that has been discussed since the rise of classical approach, taking various scholars’ different ideas on this issue into consideration and their evaluation bear importance since it would contribute greatly to the entrepreneurship theory. This study aims to put forward the entrepreneurship theory based on periods and attempt to explain how it reached the level of today’s entrepreneurship that is basically employment creation and obtaining economic growth
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Girişimcilik faaliyetlerinin ekonomik büyümeye önemli katkı sağladığı; literatürde genel kabul görmüş bir olgudur. Her uygulama temel bir teoriye dayanmaktadır. Girişimcilik; iktisat bilimi ve toplumu temel dayanak noktası alan bir yaklaşım ile tarihsel süreçte değişime uğramış ve teorisini geliştirmiştir. Şüphesiz bu gelişimde; dönemler itibariyle iktisat teorisyenlerinin dönemin iktisadi olgularına farklı bakış açıları önemli derecede etkili olmuştur. Klasik iktisadi düşüncenin ortaya çıkışından itibaren tartışılmaya başlanan girişimcilik teorisinin gelişiminin; süreçte iktisat teorisyenlerinin farklı bakış açılarının göz önünde bulundurulması ve günümüz girişimcilik anlayışında tekrar değerlendirilmesinin, girişimcilik teorisine katkı yapacağı düşünülmektedir. Bu çalışma; girişimcilik teorisini dönemler itibariyle ortaya koyarak, günümüzde girişimciliğin istihdam yaratma ve ekonomik büyümeye sağladığı katkı yönündeki anlayışa nasıl ulaştığını vurgulamaya çalışmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_114522_8_pp_29-54.pdf
  • 1
29-54
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

ALVAREZ, Sharon A., Jay B. Barney (2002), “Resource Based
Theory and the Entrepreneurial Firm”, Strategic
Entrepreneurship: Creating a New Mindset, (ed. Michael A.
Hitt vd.), Blackwell Publishers Ltd., UK, pp. 89-106.
AUDRETSCH, David B. (2012), Audretsch, “Entrepreneurship
Research”, Management Decision, Vol. 50, Issue 5, pp.
755-764.
AUDRETSCH, David B., Oliver Falck, Maryann P. Feldman,
Stephan Heblich (2012), “Local Entrepreneurship in
Context”, Regional Studies, Volume 46:3, pp. 379-389.
BAPTISTA, Rui ve Miguel Torres Preto (2006), “The Dynamics of
Causality Between Entrepreneurship and Employment”,
International Conference on Management of Innovation and
Technology, Singapore, pp. 66-70.
BAUMOL, William J. (1968), “Entrepreneurship in Economic
Theory”, American Economic Association, The American
Economic Review, Vol. 58, No: 2, Papers and Proceedings
of the Eightieth Annual Meeting of the American Economic
Association, May, pp. 64-71.
BRADLEY, Michael E. (2010), “Adam Smith’s System of Natural
Liberty: Competition, Contestability, and Market Process”,
Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Volume 32,
Number 2, pp. 237-262.
CASSON, Mark (2003), The Entrepreneur, An Economic Theory,
Second Edition, Edward Elgar Publication, USA.
DRUCKER, Peter (1985), Innovation and Entrepreneurship Practice
and Principles, Harper Collins Publishers Ltd., USA.
ELIASSON, Gunnar and Magnus Henrekson (2004), “William J.
Baumol: An Entrepreneurial Economist on the Economics
of Entrepreneurship”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 23,
No. 1, pp. 1-7.
GILLIN, John (1961), “Book Reviews”, American Antropologist,
Volume 63, Issue 2, Article First Published online: 28
October 2009, pp. 456-458.
GRILO, Isabel and Roy Thurik (2008), “Determinants of
Entrepreneurial Engagement Levels in Europe and the US”,
Industrial and Corporate Change, Volume 17, Number 6, pp.
1113-1145.
GUNNING, Patrick J. (1997), “Ludwig von Mises’ Transformation
of the Austrian Theory of Value and Cost”, History of
Economics Review, Vol 26, Winter-Summer, pp. 11-20.
HAGEDOORN, John (1996), “Innovation and Entrepreneurship:
Schumpeter Revisited”, Industrial and Corporate Change,
Volume 5, Number 3, Oxford University Press, pp. 883-896.
LANDSTRÖM, Hans (2004), “Pioneers in Entrepreneurship
Research”, Crossroads of Entrepreneurship, Ed. Guido
Corbetta, Morten Huse, Davide Ravasis, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Springer Science and Business Media, Inc.
Dordrecht, pp. 13-33.
McCRAW, Thomas K. (2007), Prophet of Innovation, Joseph
Schumpeter and Creative Destruction, The Belknap Press
of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
and London, England.
MEDEARIS, John (2001), “Ideology, Democracy and the Limits of
Equilibrium: A Schumpeterian Critique”, British Journal of
Political Science, Cambridge University Press, Volume 31,
Issue 02, pp. 355-388.
MINER, John B. (1997), A Psychological Typology of Successful
Entrepreneurs, Quorum Books, USA.
MISES, Ludwig von (1996), Human Action A Treatise on
Economics, The Scholar’s Edition, Ludwig Von Mises
Institute.
RIPSAS, Sven (1998), “Towards an Interdisciplinary Theory of
Entrepreneurship”, Small Business Economics, Kluwer
Academic Publishers, Sayı: 10, Netherlands, pp 103-115.
SPIRO, Melford E. (1963), “Book Reviews-On the Theory of Social
Change”, American Antropologist, Wiley Online Library,
Volume 65, Issue 5, pp. 1143-1145.
ZIMMERMAN, Jack (2008), Refining Definition of Entrepreneurship,
Proquest Information and Learning Company.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com