Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Pankreas Nakli Başarısında Pankreas Naklinin Tipi ve Egzokrin Ağızlaştırma Şekli Ne Kadar Önemlidir? Akdeniz Üniversitesi Hastanesi Deneyimi

Is the Type of Pancreas Transplantation and Exocrine Anastomosis Method Important for Successful Pancreas Transplantation? Experience of Akdeniz University Hospital

Journal Name:

  • Türk Nefroloji, Diyaliz ve Transplantasyon Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012
DOI: 
DOI 10.5262/tndt.2012.1001.13

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of pancreas transplantation concomitant with renal transplantation (SPKT) or following renal transplantation (PAKT) and the exocrine anastomosis methods, enteric versus bladder anastomosis. MATE RIAL and methodS: We included 44 patients who had pancreas transplantation between February 2003 – November 2009 in our center (SPKT and PAKT, 20- 24 patients respectively; enteric and bladder anastomosis, 31-13 patients respectively). The patient and graft survivals, blood glucose regulation parameters and complication rates were compared. Res ults: Patient and graft survival, reoperation necessity and other complications were similar in both types of pancreas transplantation and exocrine anastomosis methods. But blood glucose control was better in SPKT and enteric type anastomosis. ConclusI on: Blood glucose control is better in patients with pancreas transplantation performed concomitantly with renal transplantation and with enteric anastomosis.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç : Çalışmamızda, böbrek nakli sonrası (PAKT) ve böbrek ile eş zamanlı yapılan pankreas nakillerinin (EBPN) ve bu nakillerdeki egzokrin ağızlaştırma yöntemlerinden enterik ve mesane ağızlaştırmanın etkinlik ve güvenilirliğinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. GEREÇ ve YÖNTEMLER: Çalışmaya Şubat 2003- Kasım 2009 yılları arasında Merkezimizde pankreas nakli yapılan 44 hasta alındı (EBPN ve PAKT sırasıyla 20- 24 hasta, enterik ve mesane ağızlaştırma sırasıyla 31-13 hasta). Grupların greft-hasta sağkalımları, kan şekeri regülasyon parametreleri ve komplikasyon oranları karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular : Greft ve hasta sağkalımı, yeniden ameliyat ve diğer komplikasyon oranlarının pankreas naklinin şekli ve egzokrin ağızlaştırma tipleri açısından benzer, şeker kontrolünün ise EBPN ve enterik formda daha iyi olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç: EBPN ve enterik ağızlaştırma yapılan hastalarda şeker kontrolü daha iyidir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_172977_21_pp_78-83.pdf
  • 1
78-83
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Gruessner AC, Sutherland DE: Analysis of United States (US) and
non-US pancreas transplant reported to the United Network for
Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant
Registry (IPTR) as of October 2001. Clin Transpl 2001; 41-72
2. Gruessner AC, Sutherland DE: Pancreas transplant outcomes for
United States (US) cases reported to the United Network for Organ
Sharing and Non-US cases reported to the International Pancreas
Transplant Registry (IPTR) as of October 2000. Clin Transpl 2000;
45-72
3. Sutherland DE, Gruessner RW, Dunn DL, Matas AJ, Humar A,
Kandaswamy R, Mauer SM, Kennedy WR, Goetz FC, Robertson
RP, Gruessner AC, Najarian JS: Lessons learned from more than
1,000 pancreas transplant at a single institution. Ann Surg 2001;
233: 463-501
4. Smets YF, Westendorp RG, van der Pijl JW, de Charro FT, Ringers
J, de Fijter JW, Lemkes HH: Effects of simultaneous pancreaskidney
transplantation on mortality of patients with type-1 diabetes
mellitus and end stage renal failure. Lancet 1999; 353: 1915-1919
5. Kaufman BD, Leventhal JR, Gallon LG, Parker MA, Elliott MD,
Gheorghiade M, Koffron AJ, Fryer JP, Abecassis MM, Stuart FP:
Technical and immunologic progress in simultaneous pancreas
kidney transplantation. Surgery 2002; 132(4): 545-554
6. Robertson P, Davis C, Larsen J, Stratta R, Sutherland DE; American
Diabetes Association: Pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 105
7. Poommipanit N, Sampaio MS, Cho Y, Young B, Shah T, Pham PT,
Wilkinson A, Danovitch G, Bunnapradist S: Pancreas after living
donor kidney versus simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant: An
analysis of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United
Network of Organ Sharing Database. Transplantation 2010; 89(12):
1496-1503
8. U.S Renal Data System: USRDS 1999 Annual Data Report: Atlas
of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD:
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and
Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 1999; E52, E68, E84
9. Rodríguez LM, Knight RJ, Heptulla RA: Continuous glucose
monitoring in subjects after simultaneous pancreas-kidney and
kidney-alone transplantation. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010; 12(5):
347-351
10. Heilman RL, Mazur MJ, Reddy KS: Immunosuppression in
simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: Progress to date.
Drugs 2010; 70(7): 793-804 PMID:20426494
11. Goodman J, Becker YT: Pancreas surgical complications. Curr
Opin Organ Transplant 2009; 14: 85-89
12. Manrique A, Jiménez C, López RM, Cambra F, Morales JM,
Andrés A, Gutiérrez E, Ortuño T, Calvo J, Sesma AG, Moreno E:
Relaparotomy after pancreas transplantation: Causes and outcomes.
Transplant Proc 2009; 41; 2472-2474

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com