Buradasınız

Improvement of Motor Performance of Students with Mentally Retardation

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Education for all is a basic tenet of our democratic faith, and the opportunity for each individual to develop optimum potential is a guiding principle of our educational system. The specialists in physical education and sport should be convinced that the whole spectrum of sportive activities can be practiced by the individuals with special needs if the teachers, parents and other people understand these disadvantages as, ability” and not as a problem. Gross motor skills and continuous tasks have been found to be retained longer and more effectively when they are associated with different knowledge (distance, spaces, time, softness, hardness, rhythm,) and other movements. The present study is focused on 24th students in special school. They were diagnosed with mentally retardation- Mild psychic retard-an IQ among 45-65; they are all educable. Each exercise has an aims, and also an intellectually task. We were appreciating motor performances as: speed running, endurance, arms and abdominal force, ball throw, and standing long jump. The hypothesis was confirmed, which meant that manipulative exercises accompanied with intellectually task increases the efficiency of physical education lessons to students with mental retardation. It emphasizes the significant progress of the experimental group compared to the control group on all indicators of motor performance. The exercises were attractive and stimulated a spirit of emulation.
23-28

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Dobins, D. A., Garron, R., Rarrick, G. L. The
motor performance of educable mentaly retarded
and intelectually normal boys after covariate control
for differences in body size, Research Quaterly 1981;
52 (1): 6-7.
2. Dunn, M.John, Hollis, F. Fait, 1989, Special Physical
Education Wm. C. Brown Publishers, College
Division, 112-124
3. Eichstaedt C. & Lavay B.W., 1992, Physical activity for
individuals with mental retardation: Infancy through
adulthood. Champain, IL: Human Kinetics.
4. Fait, H. F., Dunn, J. M., 1984, Special physical
education: Adapted, individualized approach.
Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders,146-149
5. Gallahue D.L., 1996, Development physical education for
today’s children. Dubugue, IA: Brown & Benchmark
6. Nicu.A. et all, 1980, Selectia in sport, Ed. Consiliul
National pentru Educatie Fizica si Sport si
Ministerul Educatiei si Invatamantului, Bucuresti.
7. Pangrazi, R. P., Dauer, V. P., 1992, Dynamic physical
education for elementary school children, 10th edition,
Maxwell Macmillan Canada Inc.,123, 134, 369-371.
8. Patricia L. Krebs., 1995, Mental Retardation In
Adapted Physical Education and Sport. Second
Edition. Joseph P. Winnick Editor, USA., 93.
9. The Eurofit Physical Fitness Test Battery, 1988.
10. Ulrich. D., 1984, A comparison of the qualitative motor
performance of normal, educable and trainable mentally
retarded students. In: Adapted Physical Activity from
theory to Application. Eason R.L., Smith T.L., &
Caron F. Human Kinetics Publishers. Champain,
Ill: Human Kinetics.
11. Ulrich D., 1985, Test of Gross Motor Development.
Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
12. Wolfarth, B., Bray, M. S., Hagberg, J. M., Perusse,
L., Rauramaa, R., Rivera, M. A., et al.. The human
gene map for performance and health-related
fitness phenotypes: the 2004 update. Medicine and
Science in Sports and Exercise 2005; 37: 881–903.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com