Buradasınız

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR REKABET AVANTAJI VE YAVAŞ İŞLETMECİLİK: ABD VE TÜRKİYE'DEKİ YİYECEK İÇECEK İŞLETMELERİ ÜZERİNE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR ARAŞTIRMA

SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE AND SLOW BUSINESS: A COMPARATIVE RESEARCH ON FOOD AND BEVERAGE COMPANIES IN TURKEY AND USA

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Markets have become more competitive by affects of globalization on capital, ideas and people mobility. As parallel to this situation companies in today's markets where the competition is more intense have engaged in efforts to sustain their lives by producing high quality products, in less time with lower cost. However, revealed ecological, economic and cultural problems which resulted from global business concept that developed and expanded after Industrial Revolution have required to existing business practices into question. In current competitive environment companies' realized the useless of traditional approaches and they looked forward to find new approaches which will provide them sustainable competitive advantage. In this context, this study includes a field research to understand affects of slow business that developed basis on Slow Food movement to companies' performance. Main purpose of field research which covers 206 food and beverage companies in Turkey and 228 in USA to compare performance of companies based on business approaches. The results of research; Companies which have higher local products and supplier utilization rate, companies which have higher rate regional staff, companies where has certificate, companies where have higher rate regional foods in their menus, and the companies where their entrepreneurs internalized the region have higher organizational performance than others. Therefore, in today's competitive environment these variables were determined as closely related to the performance of companies'. When companies' performances compared by business approaches, results show that slow business companies have higher performance than traditional business companies.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Küreselleşme sermayenin, düşünce biçimlerinin ve insanların daha hareketli hale gelmesine neden olarak piyasaları daha rekabetçi konuma getirmiştir. Bu duruma paralel işletmeler daha yoğun rekabetin bulunduğu günümüz piyasalarında daha kısa zamanda, daha düşük maliyetli ve daha kaliteli ürünler üreterek yaşamlarını sürdürme çabasına girmişlerdir. Ancak Sanayi Devrimi sonrasında gelişen ve genişleyen küresel iş yapma anlayışı kapsamında olarak ortaya çıkan doğal, ekonomik ve kültürel problemler mevcut iş yapma anlayışının sorgulanmasını gerektirmiştir, işletmelerin de süregelen rekabet ortamında geleneksel yaklaşımların artık geçerli olmayacağının farkına varmasıyla yeni yaklaşımlara yöneldiği ve işletmeleri sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajı sağlayacak yeni yöntemleri bulmaya ittiği söylenebilir Bu kapsamda çalışmada Yavaş Yemek felsefesi temelinde geliştirilen yavaş işletmecilik anlayışının işletme performanslarına etkisini anlamaya çalışan bir alan araştırması yapılmıştır Türkiye'de 206 ABD'de 228 yiyecek içecek işletmesini kapsayan araştırmanın temel amacı işletmecilik anlayışına göre işletme performanslarının karşı-laştınlmasıdır. Araştırma sonuçlarına daha yüksek yerel ürün ve tedarikçi kullanım oranına sahip olan, daha yüksek oranda bölgesel personel çalıştıran, sertifikaya sahip, menude bölgesel yiyecek bulundurma oranının daha yüksek olduğu ve bölgeyi içselleştirmiş girişimcilerin işletmelerinin performanslarının daha yüksek olduğu görülmüştür Dolayısıyla bu değişkenlerin gunumuz rekabet koşullarında işletmelerin performanslanyla yafandan ilgili olduğu belirlenmiştir, işletmecilik anlayışları bakımından işletmelerin performanslan değerlendirildiğindeyse yavaş işletmecilik anlayışıyla yönetilen işletmelerin daha yüksek performansa sahip olduğu görülmüştür
80-101

REFERENCES

References: 

BABAKRI, K.A.,
BENNETT,
R.A.,
RAO, S., FRANCHETTI, W., (2004). Recycling Performance of Firms Before and After Adoption of the ISO 14001 Standard, Journal of Cleaner Production, 12: 633-637.
BARNEY, J.B., (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120
BEŞÎROV, L, (2007). Yeni Rekabet Koşullarında İşletmelerin Yol Haritası: Azerbaycan Şarap İşletmeleri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme, Doktora Tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İsparta.
BOWEN, RE, OSTROFF, C, (2004). Understanding HRM-Firm performance linkages: The role of the strength of the HRM system, Academy of Management Review, 29(2): 203-221.
CHAVAN, M, (2005). An Appraisal of Environment Management Systems: A Competitive Advantage for Small Businesses, Management Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 16(5): 444^163.
DALTON, D.R, TODOR, W.D., SPENDO-LINI, M.J., FIELDING, G.J., PORTER, L.W., (1980). Organization Structure And Performance: A Critical Review, Academv of Management Review, 5: 49-64.
DEBONO, E, (1996).
Rekabet Ustu (Çeviren: Oya Özel), Remzi Kitabevi: İstanbul
DRÖGE, C, VICKERY,S., MARKLA M), RE,
(1995).
Sources and Outcomes of Competitive Advantage: An Exploratory Study in the Furniture Industry, Decision Sciences, 25 (5-6): 669-689.
ENTELECARESEARCHAND CONSULTANCY (2000). Tourists' Attitudes Towards Regional and Local Foods, Prepared for the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the
98
UHBAB
d
mm
ID:69K:149 UHBAB
www.uhbabdergisi.com KV}
TO
Temmuz/Agustos/Eylul Yaz Donemi Cilt: 2 Sayı: 5 Yıl:2013 Jel Kodu: L İD - Ll - K20
Uluslararası Hakemli Beşeri ve Akademik Bilimler Dergisi C^J
Countryside Agency by Enteleca Research and Consultancy, London:MAFF
ERBAŞLAR, G, (2007). Yeşil Pazarlama, Paradoks, 3(1): 1-12.
FINEMAN, S,
(2001).
Fashioning the Environment, Organization. 8(1): 17-31.
GALBRAITH. J., KAZANJIAN. R, (1986). Strategy implementation. St. Paul. MN: West
GALLAROTTI, G.M., (1995). It Pays to be Green: The Managerial Incentive Structure and Environmentally Sound Strategies, Columbia Journal of World Busines, 30(4): 38-58.
GLEICK, J, (1999). Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything, New York: Pantheon Books.
GOTTSCHALK, S., (1999). Speed Culture: Fast Strategies in Televised Commercial Ads, Qualitative Sociology, 22 (4): 311-329.
GÖKDERE, H, (1995). Küçük Ölçekli Sanayi İsletmelerinin Rekabet Gücünün Arttınlma-sında Kooperatifleşmenin Rolu ve Önemi, Yüksek lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara
HANNAN. M.,
FREEMAN../..
(1977). The Population Ecology of Organizations, American Journal of Sociology, 82: 929-964.
HANNAN, M.T, FREEMAN, J., MEYER, J.W., (1976). Specification of Models for Organizational Effectiveness, American Sociological Review, 41: 136-143.
HANT,
S.L, (1995). ANatural- Resource- Based View of the Firm, Academy of Management Review, 20 (4): 986-1014.
HESTER, LJ., (2005). The Impact of Strategic Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: A Perspective of The Resource-Based View of the Firm, Doktora Tezi, Nova Southeasthern University, H. Wayne School of Business and Entreprene-urship, USA.
KALEKA, A., (2002). Resources and Capabilities Driving Competitive Advantage in Export Markets: Guidelines for Industrial Exporters, Industrial Marketing Management, 31(3): 273-283
KNOX, P.L., (2005). Creating Ordinary Places: Slow Cities in a Fast World, Journal of Urban Design, 10(1): 1-11
LAM,
S.K.S., YEUNG, C.K.J., (2010). Staff localization and environmental uncertainty on firm performance in China, Asia Pacific Journal of Management 27: 677-695.
LIN, C, TSENG, H, (2006). Identfying the Pivotal Role of Participation Strategies and information Technology Application for Supply Chain Excellence, Industrial management & Data Systems, 106: 739-756.
LIPSCHUTZ, D.R, (2002). The Clash of Go-vernmentalities: The Fall of the UN Republic and America's Reach for Imperium. University of Sussex.
LYNCH, R, (1997). Corporate Strategy, Pitman Publishing, Great Britain
99
UHBAB
Cf\) www.uhbabdergisi.com Y\-/> Uluslararası Hakemli Beşeri ve Akademik Bilimler Dergisi
*^&J Temmuz/Agustos/Eylül Yaz Dönemi Cilt: 2 Sayı: 5 Yıl:2013 Jel Kodu: L ID - Ll - K20
UHBAB ID:69K149
MACDUFF, I, (2006). Your Pace or Mine? Culture, Time and Negotiation, Negotiation Journal, January: 31-45.
MADU, CN, KUEI, CH, JACOB, R.A., (1996). An Empirical Assessment of the Influence of Quality Dimensions on Organizational Performance, Internal Journal of Production Research, Vol. 34: 1943-1962.
MARSH, J., (2005). Sustainable Workstyles and Ambient Intelligence, ss. 1362-1371, içinde Innovation and the knowledge Economy: issues, Applications, Case Studies fed Miriam Cunningham), IOS Press.
MERRETT, CD, MCILVAINE-NEWSAD, H, MAAKESTAD,W., MCLAUGHLIN P. (2008). Slow Food Lessons in the Fast Food Midwest, Southern Rural Sociology 23(1): 72-93.
OKUMUŞ, F, (2002). Turistik İşletmelerde Rekabet Avantajı Yaratma ve Koruma, TC Turizm Bakanlığı U. Turizm Şurası Bildirileri, Ankara, 12-14 Nisan 2002.
PFEFFER, J., SALANCIK, J., (1978). The
External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper & Row
PINK, S, (2007). Sensing Citta Slow: Slow Living and the Constitution of the Sensory City, The Senses and Society, 2(1): 59-77.
PORTER, M, (1996). What is Strategy, Harvard Business Review. November-December: 61-78.
PORTER, M, (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.
PRAHALAD, CK, HAMEL G, (1990). The
Core Competence Of The Corporation. Harvard Business Review. 68(3):79-91
SCHEUERMAN, W.E, (2001). Rules and
Networks. İçinde R. P. Appelbaum, W. L. Felstiner, V Gessner (Editörler), Global Law in Our High Speed Economy, (ss. 103-121), Oxford: Hart Publishing.
SENGE, P M, (1993).
Beşinc
i Disiplin, Yapı Kredi Yayınlan, İstanbul.
TAN,
LP, (2005). Implementing ISO 14001: Is It Beneficial for Firms in Newly Industrialized Malaysia?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 397-404.
WARD, V, HOI Til AM. C, BOHN, M, (2001). Slow Company - How Procrastination and Delay improve The Quality of Knowledge, Collaboration And Understanding, Palermo, Spacing and Timing Conference, Palermo.
WERNERFELT, B., (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180
YAZICIOĞLU, Y, ERDOĞAN, S, (2004). Spss Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık
YURTSEVEN, HR, KAYA, O.,
(2010).
Could Slow Business Be An Alternative To Obtain Sustainability?, 6th International Symposium on Business Administration: Global Economic Crisis and Changes-Resstructuring Business System: Strategic Perspectives for Local, National and Global Actors, Karvina, Silesian University in Opava.
100
UHBAB
d m m
ID:69K:149 UHBAB
www.uhbabdergisi.com KV}
TO
Temmuz/Agustos/Eylul Yaz Donemi Cilt: 2 Sayı: 5 Yıl:2013 Jel Kodu: L ID - Ll - K20
Uluslararası Hakemli Beşeri ve Akademik Bilimler Dergisi C^J
YURTSEVEN, H.R, KAYA, O.,
(2009).
Local Food in Local Menus: The Case of Gökçeada, International Conference on Tourism Development and Management. 11-14 Sep., Koş Island, Greece.
ZAHRA, S.A.,
DAS,
SR., (1993). Building Competitive Advantage on Manufacturing Resources, Long Range Planning, 26 (2): 90-100.
101

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com