Buradasınız

TAM PROTEZ ÖLÇÜLERİNDE FARKLI YOĞUNLUKTAKİ İRREVERSİBL HİDROKOLLOİDLERİN KULLANILDIĞI YENİ BİR YÖNTEM

A NEW METHOD FOR COMPLETE DENTURE IMPRESSIONS USING DIFFERENT DENSITY HYDROCOLLOIDS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The article describes the use of a novel formulation of irreversible hydrocolloid, which is available in different densities. A low-density material is used initially to capture fine details via an injection technique using a syringe apparatus. A high-density formulation is then placed into a tray and used to capture the definitive border anatomy design for removable prosthodontic procedures. The major advantages of this technique are the lack of tissue compression, the simple methods employed, and the short time to obtain an impression.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makalede farktı yoğunluklarda kullanılabilen irreversİbl hİdrokolloidin yeni bir fonrıuİasyonunun kullanımı anlatıimıştır. Önce düşük yoğunluklu materyal bir şırıngayla kullanılarak enjeksiyon tekniği ile ince detayları vermek üzere uygulanır. Ardından yüksek yoğunluktaki irrcversibl hidrokolloid bir ölçü kaşığına yerleştirilir ve hareketli protez yapımı için belirlenen anatomik sınırları içine alacak şekilde ağza uygulanır. Bu tekniğin en büyük avantajları doku basıncını kaldırması, kullanılan yöntemin basitliği ve kısa sürede ölçü almabİlmesidir.
9
14

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Roraff AR, Stansbury BE. Errors caused by dimensional change in mounting materials. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28: 247-252.
2. Fattore L, Malone WF, Sandrik JL, Mazur B, Hart T. Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of Interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 152¬157.
3. Muller J, Gotz G, Bruckner G, Kraft E. An experimental study of vertical deviations induced by different interocclusal recording materials. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 43-50.
4. Utz KH, Muller F, Bernard N, Hultenschmidt R, Kurbel R. Comparative studies on check-bite and central-bearing-point method for the remounting of complete dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 717-726.
5. Utz KH. Studies of changes in occlusion after the insertion of complete dentures (part II). J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 376-384.
6. Starcke EN Jr. A historical review of complete denture impression materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1975; 91: 1037-1041.
7. Zinner ID, Sherman H. An analysis of the development of complete denture impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 46: 242-249.
8.
Çalıkkocaoğlu S. Tam Protezler; Cilt 1; İstanbul; 1998.
9.
Zarb GA,vBolender CL, Eckert SE, Fenton AH, Jacob RF, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthodontİc Treatment for Edentulous Patients: Complete Dentures and Implant-Supported Prostheses; Mosby; 2003.
10. John S, Smith J, McCord F, Macfarlane TV. Factors that affect the adhesion of two irreversible hydrocolloid materials to two custom tray materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 423-430.
11. Massad JJ. A metal-based denture with soft liner to accommodate the severely resorbed mandibular alveolar ridge. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57: 707-711.
14
Ayşen NEKORA AZAK, Gülümser EVLİOĞLU, Evrim GÖRE
12. Samet N, Shohat M, Linvy A, Weiss EI. A clinical evaluation of fixed partial denture impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 112¬117.
13. Wang HY, Lu YC, Shiau YY, Tsou D. Vertical distorsion in distal extension ridges and palatal area of casts made by different techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75: 302¬308.
14. Lemon JC, Okay DJ, Powers JM, Martin JW, Chambers MS. Facial moulage: the of a retarder on compressive strength and
working times of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 276-281.
15. Frank R, Thielke SM, Johnson GH. The influence of tray type and other variables on the palatal depth of casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 15-22.
16. Jooste CH, Bradshow D, DuToit I. The effect of a custom edentulous impresssion tray on lingual sulcus depth. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 646-651.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com