Buradasınız

Hegemony, Aid and Power: A Neo-Gramscian Analysis of the World Bank

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
There have been various attempts over the course of recent years in international relations and international political economy literatures to develop theoretically-informed analytical perspectives to conceptualize the changing roles and functions of international institutions. Aimed at contributing to this emerging literature, this study is predicated on an analysis of the World Bank in line with the neo- Gramscian theoretical framework formulated by Robert W. Cox with special reference to the notion of hegemony. To this end, a precise outline of the neo-Gramscian framework as conceived by Cox is presented by referring to his conceptions of critical theory and complex multilateralism. Afterwards, the advisory and financial roles of the World Bank are described along with the major points of criticism raised against this critical institution. Regarding the prospects for transformation and institutional reform at the Bank, a crucial case-study conducted by Robert O’Brien is highlighted pertaining to interactions between global economic institutions and global social movements. The study concludes by presenting broader remarks from the Coxian/Neo-Gramscian perspective concentrating on the impact of social pressures on the transformation of institutional structures that make up the global governance architecture.
39-52

REFERENCES

References: 

Cohn, Theodore. 2003. Global Political Economy: Theory and Practice. Second Edition.
New York: Longman.
Cox, Robert. 1996a. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International
Relations Theory”. In R.W. Cox and T.J. Sinclair (1996) Approaches to World
Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Originally published in 1981).
Cox, Robert. 1996b. “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in
Method”. In R.W. Cox and T.J. Sinclair (1996) Approaches to World Order,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Originally published in1983).
Cox, Robert. 1996c. “Multilateralism and World Order”. In R.W. Cox and T.J. Sinclair
(1996) Approaches to World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
(Originally published in 1992).
Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
Gilpin, Robert. 2001. Global Political Economy: Understanding the International
Economic Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gore, Charles. 2003. “The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm
for Developing Countries”. In C. R. Goddard, P. Cronin and K.C. Dash (eds.)
International Political Economy: State-Market Relations in a Changing Global
Order, Second Edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Lateef, Kamal. 1996. “The World Bank: Its First Half Century”. In C.R. Goddard, J.T.
Passe-Smith and J.G. Conklin (eds.) International Political Economy: State-Market
Relations in the Changing Global Order, London: Lynne Rienner.
O’Brien, Robert. 1997. “Complex Multilateralism: The Global Economic Institutions–
Global Social Movements Nexus”. Seminar Paper presented in Non-State Actors
and Authority in the Global System Conference (31 October-1 November 1997),
Center for the Study of Globalization and Regionalization, the University of
Warwick.
Picciotto, Robert. 2003. “A New World Bank for a New Century”, in C. R. Goddard, P.
Cronin and K.C. Dash (eds.) International Political Economy: State-Market
Relations in a Changing Global Order, Second Edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Rich, Bruce. 1996. “The World Bank/IMF: 50 Years is Enough”. In Goddard, C.R, Passe-
Smith, J.T. and Conklin, J.G.(eds) International Political Economy: State-Market
Relations in the Changing Global Order, London: Lynne Rienner.
Rich, Bruce. 2003. “Still Waiting: The Failure of Reform at the World Bank”. In C. R.
Goddard, P. Cronin and K.C. Dash (eds.) International Political Economy: State-
Market Relations in a Changing Global Order. Second Edition. Basingstoke:
Palgrave.
Sinclair, Timothy. 1996. “Beyond International Relations Theory: Robert Cox and
Approaches to World Order”. In R.W. Cox and T.J. Sinclair (1996) Approaches
to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tandon, Yash. 1994. “Recolonization of Subject Peoples”. Alternatives. 19-2.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com