Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

8. Sınıflara Alternatif Enerji Kaynaklarının Mühendislik Dizayn Metodu ile Öğretimi

Teaching Alternate Energy Sources to 8th Grades Students by Engineering Design Method

Journal Name:

  • Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The main purpose of this study is to create instructional materials for alternate energy resources topic as an example. The research was conducted in two rural area middle schools in a southern province in 2013. The experimental group included 44 students and the control group included 52 students. The experimental group took engineering-design based alternate energy resources lessons while the control group took textbook-based alternate energy resources lessons. The Alternative Energy Sources Achievement Test (AESAT) was used as both pretest and posttest for both the groups. According to the results, it was concluded that engineering design method can also be an effective wasy to teach science.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın temel amacı örnek teşkil etmesi açısından mühendislik dizayn yaklaşımına uygun alternatif enerji kaynakları ile ilgili etkinlik planları oluşturmaktır. Araştırma 2013 yılında Güney illerinden birinde iki köy okulunda uygulanmıştır. Deney grubunda 44 kontrol grubunda ise toplam 52 öğrenci bulunmaktadır. Deney grubuna alternatif enerji kaynaklarıyla ilgili mühendislik dizayn yöntemi kullanılarak geliştirilen etkinlikler, kontrol grubuna ise aynı konuyla ilgili Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) onaylı mevcut ders kitabındaki etkinlikler uygulanmıştır. Deney ve kontrol gruplarına geliştirilen Alternatif Enerji Kaynakları Başarı Testi (AEKBT) öntest ve sontest olarak uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara gore mühendislik dizayn yöntemi ile de etkin biçimde fen öğretimi yapılabileceği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-8.siniflara-alternatif-enerji-kaynaklarinin-muhendislik-dizayn-metodu-ile-ogretimi.pdf
  • 1
41
58
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Apedoe, X. S., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms: the heating/cooling unit. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 454–465.
Aydede, M. N. (2006). İlköğretim altıncı sınıf fen bilgisi dersinde aktif öğrenme yaklaşımını kullanmanın akademik başarı, tutum ve kalıcılık üzerine etkisi.Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
Bers, M. U., & Portsmore, M. (2005). Teaching partnerships: Early childhood and engineering students teaching math and science through robotics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 59-73.
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education,97(3), 369-387.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. (11. Baskı), Ankara: Pegem Akademi yayınları.
Cajas, F. (2001). The science/technology interaction: Implications for science literacy. Journal of research in science teaching, 38(7), 715-729.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (2nd edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Cunningham, C., & Hester, K. (2007). Engineering is elementary: An engineering and technology curriculum for children. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2004). Design‐based science and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1081-1110.
Fortus, D., Dershimer, R. C., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2005). Designbased science and real-world problem-solving. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7): 855–879
Johnson, B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed Methods Resarch: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33 (7), 14-26
Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press
Kolodner, J. L. (2002). Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons learned from an inquiry into science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3).
Kolodner, J.L., P.J. Camp, D. Crismond, B. Fasse, J. Gray, & J. Holbrook (2003). Problem based learning meets case-based reasoning in the science classroom: putting learning by- design into practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 12(4): 495–547.
Marulcu, I., & Barnett, M. (2010). Teaching simple machines to college students through LEGO™ engineering design challenges. In M.F. Taşar & G. Çakmakcı (Eds.), Contemporary science education research: learning and assessment (pp. 173-182). Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi
Marulcu, I., & Barnett, M. (2013). Fifth Graders’ Learning About Simple Machines Through Engineering Design-Based Instruction Using LEGO™ Materials. Research in Science Education, 1-26.
Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, Issue 9
Year 2014
58
MEB (2006), İlköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi (6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar) öğretim programı, Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design-based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of Engineering Education. 97(1), 71–85.
Nagy, S. and Biber, H. (2010). Mixed methods research: merging theory with practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
Noble, M. (2001). The educational impact of LEGO Dacta materials. Sheffield Hallam University. Retrieved November, 2, 2004.
Penner, D. E., Giles, N. D., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1997). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 125-143.
Ringwood, J. V., Monaghan, K., & Maloco, J. (2005). Teaching engineering design through Lego® Mindstorms™. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 91-104.
Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2004). Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a sixth grade project‐based science curriculum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(7), 669-692.
Roth, W.M. (2001). Learning science through technological design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(7): 768–790.
Silk, E. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Using robotics to teach mathematics: Analysis of a curriculum designed and implemented. In American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
Wang, H. H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM Integration: Teacher Perceptions and Practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education, 1(2).
Wendell, K. B., & Lee, H. S. (2010). Elementary students’ Learning of materials science practices through instruction based on engineering design tasks.Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(6), 580-601.
Wendell, K. B., Connolly, K. G., Wright, C. G., Jarvin, L., Rogers, C., & Barnett, M. (2008). Design a musical instrument: The science of sound. Unpublished science curriculum unit. URL: http://legoengineering.com/curriculumsubmenuteachingresources-142.html
İnternet Kaynakları
1. http://www.limitsizenerji.com/temel-bilgiler/yenilenebilir-enerji-kaynak..., (14. 11. 2013).
2. www.usfirst.org, (14. 11. 2013)

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com