MANTIKSAL DENEYİMSEL DÜŞÜNME ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE FORMUNUN GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Anderson J.C. , Gerbing, D.W. (1984) The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper
solutions and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis.
Psychometrika, 49, 155-173.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. (First Edition). NY:
Guilford Publications, Inc.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Özkahveci, Ö., Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve öğrenme
statejileri ölçeğinin türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada
Eğitim Bilimleri, 4 (2), 210-239.
Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis. (3rd Edition). New York: Continuum.
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Çok değişkenli istatistik SPSS ve
LISREL uygulamaları (Birinci baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
Daniel, F., Nicole, E., Rachel, L (2012). Gut feelings, deliberative thought and paranoid ideation:
a study of experiential and rational reasoning. Psychiatry Research 1/2, 119-122
Denes-Raj V., Epsteın S. (1994). Conflict between ıntuitive and rational processing: When people
behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
66 (5), 819-829.
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconcious. American
Psychologist, 49(8), 709-724.
Epstein, S. (1998). Cognitive-experientaial self theory: A dual process personality theory with
ımplications for diagnosis and psychotherapy. In R. F. Bornstein and J.M.Masling (Eds.),
emprical research on the pschoanalytic unconcious (Vol 7, p. 99-140). Washington D.C:
American Psychological Association.
Epstein, S. (2006). Conscious and unconcious self-esteem from the perspective of cognitive
experiential self theory. In M.H. Kernis (Eds.), Self-esteem Issues and Answers: A sourcebook
of current perspectives (p.69-76). NewYork: Psychology Pres.
Epstein, S., Lipson, A., Holstein, C., Huh, E. (1992). Irrational reactions to negative outcomes:
evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
62, 328-339.
Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in ıntuitiveexperiential
and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 71, 390-405.
Erkuş.A, (2003). Psikometri üzerine yazılar. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları
Evans, J. (2008). Dual processing accounts of reasoning, judgement and social cognition.
Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
Feng, B., Lee, K.J. (2010). The influence of thinking styles on responses to supportive messages.
Communication Studies, 61(2), 224-238.
Flectcher, J.M., Marks, A.D.G., Hine, D.W. (2011). Latent profile analysis of working memory
capacity and thinking styles in adults and adolescents. Journal of Research in Personality,
46, 40-48.
Gelbal, S. ve Duyan, V. (2008). Barnett çocuk sevme ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanma çalışması.
Eğitim ve Bilim 33(148). 40-48
568 Eylem Gökçe TÜRK, Deniz GÜLLEROĞLU...
Mayıs 2014 Cilt:22 No:2 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
Hair, J.F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data
analysis. (6th Edition). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Horhata, M., Mienaltowski, A., Blanchard-Fields, F. (2012). If only I had taken my usual
route age related differences in counter-factual thinking. Aging, Neuropsychology and
Cognition, 19(3), 339-361
Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:
Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Jöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8 : Structural equation modeling with the simplis
command language. Scientific Software International.
Kirkpatrick, L. A., Epstein, S. (1992). Cognitive experiential self theory and subjective probability:
Further evidence for two conceptual systems. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 63 (4), 534-544.
Klaczynski, P. A., Cottrell, J.M. (2004). A dual process approach to cognitive development:
The case of children’s understanding of sunk cost decisions. Thinking&Reasoning, 10(2),
147-174.
Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: Guilford
Publication
Kokis, J. V., Macpherson, R., Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E. (2002). Heuristic
and analytic processing: age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive
styles. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 26-52.
Marks, A.D.G., Hine, D. W., Blore, R. L., Phillips, W. J. (2008). Assesing individual differences
in adolescents’ preference for rational and experiential cognition. Personality and
Individual Differences, 44, 42-52.
Norris, P. ve Epstein, S. (2012). An experiential thinking style: its facets and relaions with
objective and subjective criterion measures. Journal of Personality79(5), 1043-1079.
Özyeşil, Z., Arslan, C., Kesici, Ş. Ve Deniz, M.E. (2011). Bilinçli farkındalık ölçeğini
Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim 36 (160) . 224-235.
Pacini, R., Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing
styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 76, 972-987.
Pacini, R., Muir, F., Eptein, S. (1998). Depressive realism from the perspective of cognitiveexperiential
self theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1056-1068.
Peterson, E. R., Deary, I. J. (2006). Examining wholistic-analytic style using preferences in
early information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 3-14.
Santrock, J.W. (2011). Yaşam boyu gelişim: gelişim psikolojisi. Ankara: Nobel
Schutte, N.S., Thorsteinsson, E.B., Hine, D.W., Foster, R., Cauchi, A., Binns, C. (2010). Experiential
and rational processing styles, emotional intelligence and wellbeing. Australian
Journal of Psychology, 62(1), 14-19.
Shiloh, S., Salton, E., Sharabi, D. (2002). Individual differences ın rational and intuitive thinking
styles as predictors of heuristic responses and framing effects. Personality and Individual
Differences, 32, 415-429.
Sladek, M.R., Bond, M.J., Phillips, P.A. (2010). Age and gender differences for rational and
experiential thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 907-911.
Mantıksal Deneyimsel Düşünme Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ... 569
May 2014 Vol:22 No:2 Kastamonu Education Journal
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. (1998). Individual differences ın rational thought. Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 127, (2),161-188.
Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk
Psikoloji Yazıları, 3 (6), 49-74.
Şekercioğlu, G. Ve Güzeller, C.O. (2012). Ergenler için benlik algısı profilinin faktör yapısının
yeniden değerlendirilmesi. Bilig, 60.215-236.
Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LİSREL
uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th Edition). Boston:
Allyn&Bacon, Inc.
Teglasi, H., Eptein, S. (1998). Temperament and personality theory: the perspective of cognitive-
experiential self theory. School Psychology Review, 27 (4), 534–548.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding
concepts and applications. (First Edition). Washington: American Psychological
Association.
Türk, E. (2011). Ergenlerin düşünme biçemlerini yordayan faktörler: Anne baba,
üstbiliş ve epistemolojik inançlar. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi) Ankara Üniversitesi,
Ankara.
Usluer, Y.K ve Vural, F.K. (2009). Bilişsel kapılma ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlama
çalışması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 42(2). 77-92