1. Huxley TH.: Evidence As to Man’s Place in Nature. London: Williamsand Norgate; 1863.
2. Bjork A.: Cranial base development. Am J Orthod. 1955;41:198–225.
3. Woo SS, Choi YS, Park WH, Yoo IH, Lee YS, ShimKS. : A Study Of Position And Size Of
Cranial Base,Maxilla, And Mandible In True Skeletal Class IIIPatients. Korean Assoc Oral
Maxillofaci Surg 2002;28: 24-30.
4. Nie X.: Cranial base in craniofacial development:developmental features, influence on facial
growth,anomaly, and molecular basis. Acta odont scand 2005;63: 127-35.
5. Kasai K, Moro T, Kanazawa E, Iwasawa T.: Relationship between cranial base and
maxillofacialmorphology. Eur J Orthod 1995; 17: 403–10.
346
Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; December 2014: Vol.-4, Issue- 1, P. 324-348
340
www.ijbamr.com P ISSN: 2250-284X , E ISSN : 2250-2858
6. Dhopatkar A, Bhatia S, Rock P. : An investigation into the relationship between the cranial
base angle and malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2002; 72: 456–63.
7. Melson B: the cranial base . the postnatal development of the cranial base studied
histologicaly on human autopsy material ; Acta Odontol Scand ; 32(supp 62); 1974
8. Ali H. Hassan: Cephalometric Norms for Saudi Adults Living in theWestern Region of Sudi
Arabia; Angle Orthod 2006;76:109–113.
9. Khoshy S. Fatehulla Jamil A. Khshan : The relationship between cranial base angle and
malocclusion among Kurdish adults in Sulaimani city: A lateral cephalometric study. J Bagh
Coll Dentistry 2010;22(3):105-110
10. Nikolaos Gkantidis,and Demetrios J. Halazonetis. : Morphological integration between the
cranial base and the face in children and adults. J. Anat. (2011) 218, pp426–438.
11. Renfroe : stuDy of facial pattern associated with Class I, Class II Div 1 and Class II Div 2
malocclusion ; Angle ortho; 18; 12-15; 1948.
12. Moss ML: Correlation of cranial base angulation with cephalic malformation and growth
disharmonies of dental interest ; NY State Dent J; 24 ; 452-454;1955
13. Ohtsukhi F ,Mukherjee D, Lewis A.B, Roche A.F: growth of the cranial base and vault
dimensions in children ;J Anthrop.soc. Nippon;90; 239-258;1982
14. Scott : the cranial base ; Am J of physical Anthropol; 16; 319-348;1958
15. Moss and Greenberg :S N; Post natal growth of the human skull base ; Angle Ortho; 25;77-
84;1955
16. Stramrud L : The pattern of craniofacial associations ; Acta Odontol Scand; 24;1-174;1959
17. William S. : Interplay between saggital and vertical growth factors.Am.J.Orthodont. 81:327-
332, 1982
18. Mills JRE. : The application and importance of cephalometry in orthodontic treatment.
Orthodontist. 1970;2:32–47.
19. Hamdan AM, Rock WP. : Cephalometric norms in an Arabic population.J Orthod.
2001;28:297–300.
20. Bhatia SN, Leighton BC. : A manual of facial growth. Oxford:Oxford University Press; 1993.
21. Ishii N, Deguchi T, Hunt PN. : Craniofacial morphology of Japanese girls with Class II
division 1 malocclusion. J Orthod 2002; 28: 211-6.
22. Chang HP, Hsieh Sh H, Tseng YCH, Chou T. : Cranial base morphology in children with
class III malocclusion. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2005; 21: 159–65.
23. Namankani EA, Bakhury TM. : Cephalometric craniofacial characteristics of a sample of
Saudi female adults with class III malocclusion. Saudi Dent J 2005;
24. Salehi P, Danaie MSh. : Mandibular Size and Position in 8-13 Year Old Iranian Children with
Class II Division 1 Malocclusion. J Dent 2006; 3: 92-9.
25. Proff P, Will F, Bokan I, Fangha¨nel J, Gedrange T. : Cranial BaseFeatures in Skeletal Class
III Patients. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 433-40.
26. Patricia A, Josmar M, Pravin P, Ana BG. : Cranial base angulation inBrazilian patients
seeking orthodontic treatent. J Cranio Faci Surg 2008; 19: 334-8.
347
Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; December 2014: Vol.-4, Issue- 1, P. 324-348
341
www.ijbamr.com P ISSN: 2250-284X , E ISSN : 2250-2858
27. Alnamankani EA. : The comparative investigation of the components ofclass III malocclusion
in a sample of adult Saudi patients. Master thesis 2004, King Saud University.
28. Behbehania F, Hicksb EP, Beemanc C, Kluemperd GT, Rayense MK.: Racial Variations in
Cephalometric Analysis between Whites and Kuwaitis. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 406-11.
29. Mouakeh M. : Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class
III malocclusion. Am J Ortho Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 640-9.
30. Battagel JM. : The aetiological factors in Class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod 1993; 15: 347-70.
31. Ngan PW, Byczek E, Scheick J. : Longitudinal evaluation of growth changes in Class II
division 1 subjects. Semin Orthod 1997; 3: 222-31.
32. Mitchell L, Carter NE, Doubleday B. : An introduction to orthodontics.2nd ed 2001 Oxford
university press.
33. Miethke RR, Lemke U. : The Angle Class II division 1is most often caused by mandibular
retrognathism. Orthodontics 2004; 1: 133–40.
34. Antanas Sidlauskas, Vilma Svalkauskiene, Mantas Sidlauskas: Assessment of Skeletal and
Dental Pattern of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion with Relevance to Clinical Practice.
Stomatologija. Baltic Dent Maxillofac J 2006;8: 3-8.
35. Lapter M, Vlaπi D, Meπtrovi S, Miloπevi S. : Cephalometric Evaluation of theIncisor
Position inSubjects with Angle Class II/1 and II/2. Acta Stomat Croat 2002; 36: 57-60.
36. Giuntini V, Toffol L, Franchi I, Baccetti T. : Glenoid Fossa Position in Class II Malocclusion
Associated with Mandibular Retrusion. Angle Orthod 2008; 78:808-13.
37. Bacetti T, Antonini A. : Glenoid fossa position in different facial types; a cephalometric
study. Br J Orthod 1997; 24: 55–9
38. Young M: A contribution to the study of the Scottish skull. Trans R Soc Edinb. 1916;51:347–
453.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com