Buradasınız

İşyerinde Psikolojik Taciz ve İşe Yabancılaşma İlişkisi Üzerinde İş Arkadaşlarından Alınan Desteğin Rolü

MOBBING AND WORK ALIENATION: SUPPORT FROM COLLEAGUES AS A MODERATOR

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between mobbing and work alienation with a special emphasis on the role of support from colleagues. A questionnaire based on Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror scale which measures mobbing and Mottaz (1981) 21-item that measures work alienation was used to assess this relationship. The sample constitutes of 182 professionals employed in various companies in Istanbul. The findings supported the main research hypothesis and showed that mobbing influences work alienation. Support from colleagues has a moderating role in the relationship between mobbing and work alienation. The results of this research provide important insight to existing theory and have practical implications for managers in terms of the relationship between mobbing and work alienation.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı psikolojik taciz ve işe yabancılaşma arasındaki ilişkiyi ve bu ilişki içerisinde çalışma arkadaşlarından alınan desteğin rolünü incelemektir. Mobbing Leymann'ın geliştirdiği Inventory of Pscyhological Terror işe yabancılaşma ise Mottaz'ın geliştirdiği İşe Yabancılaşma ölçekleri kullanılarak ölçülmüştür. Çalışmanın örneklemi İstanbul'da farklı şirketlerde çalışan 182 beyaz yakalı çalışandan oluşmaktadır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda araştırmanın hiptezleri doğrulanmış ve psikolojik tacizin işe yabancılaşmayı etkilediği ortaya konulmuştur. Ayrıca, çalışma arkadaşlarından alınan desteğin de şartlı değişken rolü oynadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Her ne kadar psikolojik taciz son dönemlerde sıklıkla çalışılan konularda biri olsa da çalışmanın sonuçları psikolojik taciz ile işe yabancılaşma arasındaki ilişki açısından yöneticilere önemli bir bakış açısı sunmaktadır.
1
28

REFERENCES

References: 

Akçoraoğlu, A. (1999) "Kamu Harcamaları, Kamu Gelirleri ve Keynesçi Politikalar: Bir Nedensellik Analizi", Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 2, 51-65.
Anderson, W., M.S. Wallace and J.T. Warner (1986) "Government Spending and Taxation: What Causes What?", Southern Economic Association, 52(3), 630-639.
Aslan, M. ve M. Taşdemir
(2009
) "Is Fiscal Synchronization Hypothesis Relevant for Turkey? Evidence from Cointegration and Causality Tests with Endogenous Structural Breaks", Journal of Money, Investment and Banking, 12, 14-25.
Barro, R.J. (1974) "Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?", Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1095-1117.
Buchanan, J. and R. Wagner (1977) Democracy in Deficit, New York: Academic Press.
Chen, S. (2008) "Untangling the Web of Causalities among Four Disaggregate Government Expenditures, Government Revenue and Output in Taiwan", Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 6(1), 99-107.
Cheng, B.S. (1999) "Causality Between Taxes and Expenditures: Evidence from Latin American Countries", Journal of Economics and Finance, 23(2), 184-192.
Ampirik Bağlamda Toplam ve Alt Kalemler Bazında Kamu Harcamaları ve Kamu Gelirleri Arasındaki İlişki: Türkiye Örneği
191
Çavuşoğlu, A.T. (2008) "Türkiye'de Kamu Gelirleri ile Kamu Harcamaları Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Ekonometrik Bir Analiz", Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 143-160.
Darrat, A.F.
(1998
) "Tax and Spend, or Spend and Tax? An Inquiry into the Turkish Budgetary Process", Southern Economic Journal, 64(4), 940-956.
Dickey, D. and W. Fuller (1979) "Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root", Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431.
Engle, R.F. and C.W.J. Granger (1987) "Co-integration and Error Correction: Represantation, Estimation, and Testing", Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
Friedman, M. (1978) "The Limitations of Tax Limitation", Policy Review, 7-14.
Furstenberg, G.M., R.J. Green and J. Jeong (1986) "Tax and Spend, or Spend and Tax?", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(2), 179-188.
Gounder, N., P.K. Narayan. and A. Prasad (2007) "An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Government Revenue and Expenditure: The Case of the Fiji Islands", International Journal of Social Economics", 34(3), 147¬158.
Granger, C.W.J. (1988) "Aggregation of Time Series Variables: A Survey", Institute for Empirical Macroeconomics Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Discussion Paper, 1, 1-25.
Granger, C.W.J. and P.L. Siklos (1995) "Systematic Sampling, Temporal Aggregation, Seasonal Adjustment, and Cointegration Theory and Evidence", Journal of Econometrics, 66, 357-369.
Li, X. (2001) "Government Revenue, Government Expenditure, and Temporal Causality: Evidence from China", Applied Economics, 33, 485-497.
Katrakilidis, C.P. (1997) "Spending and Revenues in Greece: New Evidence from Error Correction Modelling", Applied Economics, 4, 387-391.
MacKinnon, J.G. (1991) "Critical Values for Cointegration Tests", in R. F. Engle and C. W.J. Granger (eds.), Long-Run Economic Relationships-Readings in Cointegration, Oxford University Press., 267-276.
Mahvadi, S. and J. Westerlund (2008) "The Tax Spending Nexus: Evidence from a Panel of US State-Local Governments", The University of Texas at San Antonio College of Business Working Paper Series, 0045, 1-28.
192
Rahmi YAMAK, Zehra ABDİOĞLU
Manage, N. and M.L. Marlow (1986) "The Causal Relation between Federal Expenditures and Receipts", Southern Economic Journal, 52(3), 617-629.
Meltzer, A.H. and S.F. Richard (1981) "A Rational Theory of the Size of Government", Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914-927.
Miller, S.M. and F.S. Russek (1990) "Co-integration and Error-Correction Models: The Temporal Causality between Government Taxes and Spending", Southern Economic Journal, 57(1), 221-229.
Musgrave, R. (1966) "Principles of Budget Determination." in H. Cameron and W.
Henderson (eds.), Public Finance: Selected Readings, New York: Random House, 15-27.
Narayan, P.K. and S. Narayan (2006) "Government Revenue and Government Expenditure Nexus: Evidence from Developing Countries", Applied
Economics, 38(3), 285-291.
Narayan, P. K. (2005) "The Government Revenue and Government Expenditure Nexus: Empirical Evidence from Nine Asian Countries", Journal of Asian Economics, 15, 1203-1216.
Newey, W.K. and K.D. West (1987) "A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix",
Econometrica, 55(3), 703-708.
Owoye, O. (1995) "The Causal Relationship between Taxes and Expenditures in the G7 Countries: Cointegration and Error-Correction Models", Applied Economics
Letters, 2, 19-22.
Payne, J. (1998) "The Tax-Spend Debate: Time Series Evidence from State Budgets",
Public Choice, 95, 307-320.
Peacock, A. and J. Wiseman (1979) "Approaches to the Analysis of Government Expenditure Growth", Public Finance Review, 7, 3-23.
Pesaran, M.H., R.G. Pierse and M.S. Kumar (1989) "Econometric Analysis of Aggregation in the Context of Linear Prediction Models", Econometrica, 57,
861-888.
Phillips, P. and P. Peron (1988) "Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regressions",
Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
Provopoulos, G. and A. Zambaras (1989) "Testing for Causality between Government Spending and Taxation", Public Choice, 68, 277-282.
Ampirik
Bağlamda Toplam ve Alt Kalemler Bazında Kamu Harcamaları ve Kamu Gelirleri Arasındaki İlişki: Türkiye Örneği
193
Terzi, H. ve S. Oltulular (2006) "Harcama-Vergi Geliri Hipotezi: Türkiye Örneği",
Atatürk Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 20(2), 1-18.
Von Furstenberg, G.M.,
R.J
. Green and J. Jeong (1986) "Tax and Spend, or Spend and Tax?", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(2), 179-188.
Wahid, N.M. (2008) "An Empirical Investigation on the Nexus between Tax Revenue and Government Spending: The Case of Turkey", International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 16, 46-51.
Zivot, E. and D.W.K. Andrews (1992) "Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis", Journal of Business and Economics Statistics, 10(3), 251-270.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com