Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ÇİNKO VE BAKIRIN SULU ÇÖZELTİDE AKTİF KARBONLA TEKLİ ADSORPSİYONU

SINGLE ADSORPTION OF CUPPER AND ZINC FROM AN AQUEOUS SOLUTION ONTO ACTIVATED KARBON

Journal Name:

  • Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Batch studies were conducted to evaluate the potential of Tip1 and Tip2 activated carbons for the adsorption of Zink and Cupper from aqueous solution. The effect of particle size, pH, initial concentration, and contact time on adsorption of zinc and cupper, and the adsorption capacities of the adsorbents were also investigated. The adsorption in these systems is highly dependent on the particle size, pH, initial adsorbate concentration, and contact time. The finest particle size (0.25-0.50 mm) showed the best removal efficiency for both adsorbents. Both the adsorbents showed best efficiency at pH 7.03 and 4.49 for Zn(II)(aq) and Cu(II)(aq) adsorption, respectively. The Langmuir isotherm successfully represented the adsorption phenomenon at specific conditions. Langmuir constant Q0 (mg/g) belonging to Tip1 AC and Tip2 AC, respectively, are 6.035 and 3.821 mg/g for Zn(II)(aq) removal and 6.930 and 0.267 mg/g for Cu(II)(aq) removal.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada odun menşeyli olarak tarafımızdan üretilen Tip 1 ve Tip 2 aktif karbon kullanılarak sulu çözeltide bakır ve çinkonun adsorpsiyonu çalışılmıştır. Çalışma sırasında; partikül büyüklüğü, pH, başlangıç derişimi ve temas süresi parametreleri kullanılan adsorbanın, adsorpsiyon kapasitesi açısından ölçülerek irdelenmiştir. Adsorpsiyon yüksek oranda partikül büyüklüğüne, pH’a, başlangıç adsorban derişimine ve temas süresine bağımlı olduğu saptanmıştır. Küçük boyutlu (0.25-0.50 mm) adsorbanın daha verimli olduğu görülmüştür. Adsorbanların Zn(II)(aq) için pH 7.03 ve Cu(II)(aq) için 4.49 değerinde en iyi verimi sağladığı görülmüştür. Adsorpsiyon verileri, Langmuir izotermini uymaktadır. Langmuir sabiti Q0 (mg/g) Tip 1 AC için Zn(II)(aq) giderimi 6.035 ve 3.821 mg/g ve Tip 2 AC, Cu(II)(aq) giderimi için 6.930 ve 0.267 mg/g değerlerinde olduğu saptanmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-cinko-bakirin-sulu-cozeltide-aktif-karbonla-tekli-adsorpsiyonu.pdf
  • 2
21-30
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Acemioğlu B., Alma M.H. (2001): “Equilibrium Studies on Adsorption of Cu(II) from
Aqueous Solution onto Cellulose”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 243, 81-84.
Agrawal A., Sahu K.K., Pandey B.D. (2004): “A Comparative Adsorption Study of Copper
on Various Industrial Solid Wastes”, AIChE Journal, 50, 2430-2438.
Al-Asheh S., Duvnjak Z. (1997): “Sorption of Cadmium and Other Heavy Metals by Pine
Bark”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 56, 35-51.
Banat F., Al-Asheh S., Mohai F. (2000): “Batch Zinc Removal from Aqueous Solution using
Dried Animal Bones”, Separation and Purification Technology, 21, 155-164.
Bayat B. (2002): “Comparative Study of Adsorption Properties of Turkish Fly Ashes I. The
Case of Nickel(II), Copper(II) and Zinc(II)”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 95, 251-273.
Carrott P.J.M., Carrott M.M.L.R., Nabais J.M.V., Ramalho J.P.P. (1997): “Influence of
Surface Ionization on the Adsorption of Aqueous Zinc Species by Activated Carbons”,
Carbon, 35, 403-410.
Chu K.H., Hashim M.A. (2000): “Adsorption of Copper(II) and EDTA-chelated Copper(II)
onto Granular Activated Carbons”, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology,
75, 1054-1060.
Chu K.H., Hashim M.A. (2002): “Adsorption and Desorption Characteristics of Zinc on Ash
Particles Derived from Oil Palm Waste”, Journal of Chemical Technology and
Biotechnology, 77, 685-693.
Erdem E., Karapinar N., Donat R. (2004): “The Removal of Heavy Metal Cations by Natural
Zeolites”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 280, 309-314.
Galiatsatou P., Metaxas M., Kasselouri-Rigopoulou V. (2002): “Adsorption of Zinc by
Activated Carbons Prepared from Solvent Extracted Olive Pulp”, Journal of Hazardous
Materials, 91, 187-203.
Gündoğan R., Acemioğlu B., Alma M.H. (2004): “Copper(II) Adsorption from Aqueous
Solution by Herbaceous Peat”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 269, 303-309.
Ho Y.S., McKay G. (2004): “Sorption of Copper(II) from Aqueous Solution by Peat”, Water,
Air, and Soil Pollution, 158, 77-97.
Kadirvelu K., Thamaraiselvi K., Namasivayam C. (2001): “Removal of Heavy Metals from
Industrial Wastewaters by Adsorption onto Activated Carbon Prepared from an
Agricultural Solid Waste”, Bioresource Technology, 76, 63-65.
Marzal P., Seco A., Gabaldón C., Ferrer J. (1996): “Cadmium and Zinc Adsorption onto
Activated Carbon: Influence of Temperature, pH and Metal/Carbon Ratio”, Journal of
Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 66, 279-285.
Mohan D., Singh K. P. (2002): “Single- and Multi-component Adsorption of Cadmium and
Zinc using Activated Carbon derived from Bagasse-an Agricultural Waste”, Water
Research, 36, 2304-2318.
Namasivayam C., Kadirvelu K. (1997): “Agricultural Solid Wastes for the Removal of Heavy
Metals: Adsorption of Cu(II) by Coirpith Carbon”, Chemosphere, 34, 377-399.
Patterson J.W. (1985): “Industrial Wastewater Treatment Technology”, 2nd ed., Stoneham:
Butterworth Publishers.
Ramos R.L., Jacome L.A.B., Barron J.M., Rubio L.F., Coronado R.M.G. (2002): “Adsorption
of Zinc(II) from an Aqueous Solution onto Activated Carbon”, Journal of Hazardous
Materials, 90, 27-38.
Ricordel S., Taha S., Cisse I., Dorange G. (2001): “Heavy Metals Removal by Adsorption
onto Peanut Husks Carbon: Characterization, Kinetic Study and Modeling”, Separation
and Purification Technology, 24, 389-401.
Weber W.J. (1972): “Physicochemical Processes for Water Quality Control”, New York:
Wiley-Interscience.
Yu B., Zhang Y., Shukla A., Shukla S.S., Dorris K.L. (2000): “The Removal of Heavy Metal
from Aqueous Solutions by Sawdust Adsorption-Removal of Copper”, Journal of
Hazardous Materials, 80, 33-42.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com