You are here

Home » Content

Neo-liberal Küreselleşme Çağında ‘Hegemonya’ yı Yeniden Yapılandırmak

Restructuring ‘Hegemony’ in the Age of Neoliberal Globalization

Journal Name:

  • Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This article aims to present a critical evaluation of the theory of hegemonic stability and world system theory on an epistemological and an ontological basis and provides an alternative theoretical route by associating the process of globalisation with the reconstruction of hegemony in today’s world. In parallel with this objective, a Gramscian derived articulation of hegemony is presented in order to analyze the role of the global configuration of capital, state and social relations of production in the formation process of the transnational historic bloc as a new hegemonic constellation. From this point of view, hegemony, in its simple terms, is conceptualized as a prevailing consensus among transnationalizing social forces consist of classes, international institutions, globally-minded, political elites and transnational capitalist class. Briefly stated, drawing on neo-Gramscian approach and theory of global capitalism, this study aims to provide an up-to-date and analytically valid conceptualization of hegemony in the age of neo-liberal globalization.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale Hegemonik İstikrar ve Dünya Sistemi kuramlarının epistemolojik ve ontolojik düzeyde eleştirel bir değerlendirmesini yapmayı ve günümüz dünyasında hegemonyanın yeniden inşasını küreselleşme süreci ile ilişkilendirerek alternatif bir kuramsal rota sunmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu hedef doğrultusunda, yeni bir hegemonik yapılanma olarak ulusötesi tarihsel bloğun oluşum sürecinde sermayenin, devletin ve toplumsal üretim ilişkilerinin küresel biçimlenişinin oynadığı rolü değerlendirebilmek amacıyla hegemonya meselesinin Gramscici bir ifadelendirmesi sunulacaktır. Bu bakış açısından hareketle en basit anlamıyla hegemonya, uluslararası kurumlar, küreselleşme yanlısı siyasal elitler ve ulusötesi kapitalist sınıflardan müteşekkil ulusötesileşen toplumsal güçler arasında hakim olan bir mutabakat olarak kavramsallaştırılmaktadır. Kısaca ifade etmek gerekirse bu çalışma yeni Gramscici yaklaşıma ve küresel kapitalizm kuramına dayanarak neo-liberal küreselleşme çağında hegemonyanın daha güncel ve analitik olarak daha geçerli bir yorumunu sunmayı hedeflemektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-neo-liberal-kuresellesme-caginda-hegemonya-yi-yeniden-yapilandirmak.pdf
  • 1
91
112
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Arrighi, G.(1994), The Long Twentieth Century, London: Verso.
Arrighi, G. and B. J. Silver (1999), Chaos and Governance in the Modern World
System, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Ashford, N.(1993), ″The Ideas of the New Right″, Ed. N. Ashford, and A. G. Jordan,
Public Policy and the Impact of the New Right. London; New York: Pinter Publishers.
Augelli, E. and C. Murphy (1988), America's Quest for Supremacy and the Third
World: A Gramscian Analysis, London: Pinter Publishers.
Bieler A. and A. D. Morton (2004), ″A critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World
Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations″,
Capital & Class, 28(1), 85-113.
Blyth, M. (2002), Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change
in the Twentieth Century, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, R. W. (1981), ″Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International
Relations Theory″, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10 (2), 126-55.
Cox, R. W. (1983), ″Gramsci, Hegemony, and International Relations: An Essay in
Method ″, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 12(2),162–175.
Cox, R. W. (1989), ″Production, the State and Change in World Order″, Ed. E.
Czempiel and J.N. Rosenau, Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches
to World Politics for the 1990s, Toronto: Lexington Books.
Cox, R. W. (1993), ″Production and Security″, Ed. R. W. Cox and T. J. Sinclair, Approaches
to World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, R. W. (1997), The New Realism: Perspectives on Multilateralism and World
Order, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2006), Preliminary
Overview of the Economics of Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago,
Chile: United Nations.
Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Frank, A. G. (1998), ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age, Berkeley: University
of California Press.
Gill, S. (1990), American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ İİBF DERGİSİ
110
Gill, S. (2003), Power and Resistance in the New World Order, Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Gill, S. and L. David (1988), The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems
and Policies, London: Harvester and Wheatsheaf.
Gill, S. and L. David (1989), ″Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital″,
International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 475-99.
Gilpin, R. (1981), War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Gilpin, R. and J. M. Gilpin (1987), The Political Economy of International Relations,
Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Gramsci, A. (1971), Selections from the Prison Notebooks, Translated from Italian
by Q. Hoare and G. Nowell-Smith, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Harvey, D. (2000), Spaces of Capital, Routhledge: New York.
Harvey, D. (2004a), The 'New' Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession, Socialist
Register, The New Imperial Challenge.
Harvey, D. (2004b), Yeni Emperyalizm, Everest: Istanbul.
Harvey, D. (2005), A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Hayek, F. A. V. (1980), The Road to Serfdom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hodgson, G. (1996), The World Turned Right Side Up: A History of the Conservative
Ascendancy in America, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Waltz K. N. (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Keohane, R. O. (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World
Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R.O. and J. S. Nye (1996), ″Realism and Complex Interdependence″, Ed.
R.C.Goddard, J.T. Passe-Smith, and J.G. Conklin, International Political Economy,
State-Market Relations in the Changing Global Order, London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Kindleberger, C. (1973), The World in Depression, 1929-1939, London: Allen Lane
The Penguin Press.
Metron, R. K. (1967), On Theoretical Sociology: Five Essays, Old and New, New
York: New York Free Press.
Peet, R. (2003), Unholy Trinity: The IMF, World Bank and WTO, Selangor: Sird.
NİSAN 2014
111
Plehwe, D. (2009), ″The Origins of Neoliberal Economic Development Discourse″,
Ed. P. Murkowski, and, D. Plehwe, The Road from Mont Pelerin: The Making of the
Neoliberal Thought Collective, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Robinson, W. I. (2001), ″Social Theory and Globalisation: The Rise of a Transnational
State″, Theory and Society, 30(2), 157–200.
Robinson, W. I. (2002), ″Global Capitalism and Nation-State Centric Thinking:
What We Don't See When We Do See Nation-States″, Response to Arrighi, Mann,
Moore, van der Pijl, and Went, Science and Society, 65(4), 500–08.
Robinson, W. I. (2004a), ″What Empire? Whose Hegemony? The Transnationalization
of Capital and The Gramscian Critique of 'Statolatry'″, The 2004 Annual Meeting
of the ISA, Montreal, 16-21 March 2004, Montreal: ISA.
Robinson, W. I. (2004b), A Theory of Global Capitalism: Production, Class, and
State in a Transnational World, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Robinson, W. I. (2005), ″Gramsci and Globalisation: From Nation- State to Transnational
Hegemony″, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy,
8(4), 1-16.
Robinson, W. I. (2008), Latin America and Global Capitalism: A Critical Globalization
Perspective, Johns Hopkins Studies in Globalization, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
University Press.
Robinson, W. I. and J. Harris (2000), ″Toward a Global Ruling Class?: Globalisation
and the Transnational Capitalist Class″, Science and Society, 64(1),11–54.
Ruggie, J. G. (1982), ″International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded
Liberalism in the Post-War Order″, International Organization, 36 (3), 379-415.
Rückert, A. (2007), ″Producing Neoliberal Hegemony? A Neo-Gramscian Analysis
of the Poverty Reducing Strategy Paper (PRSP) in Nicaragua″, Studies in Political
Economy, 79 (4), 91-118
Tilly C. (1984), Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons, New York: Russell
Sage Foundation.
Valdes, J. G. (1995), Pinochet's Economists: The Chicago School in Chile. Historical
Perspectives on Modern Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallerstein, I. (1974), The Modern World-System, Capitalist Agriculture and the
Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century, London: Academic
Press.
Wallerstein, I. (1984), ″The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the
Capitalist World- Economy″, International Journal of Comparative Sociology,
24(2),100–08.
ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ İİBF DERGİSİ
112
Wallerstein, I. (2000), ″Globalization or the Age of Transition?: A Long-Term View
of the Trajectory of the World-System″, International Sociology, 15(2), 249-265.
Weaver, F. S. (2000), Latin America in the World Economy: Mercantile Colonialism
to Global Capitalism, Latin American Perspective Series, Boulder: Westview Press.
Wendt, E. A. (1987), ″The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory″,
International Organizations, 41(3), 335-70.
World Bank (WB). (2009), The World Bank Group: World Development Indicators.
http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators, [Accessed:
23.05.2011].

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com