You are here

Home » Content

D. H. LAWRENCE'IN LADY CHATTERLEY'İN SEVGİLİSİ ADLI ESERİNDE ARKETİPLERİ KULLANIMI

D. H. LAWRENCE'S USAGE OF ARCHETYPES IN LADY CHATTERLEY'S LOVER

Journal Name:

  • Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2016
DOI: 
10.18026/cbusos.71536

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The present analysis is intended to shed some light on D. H. Lawrence's use of myth, recurrent mythical images and archetypal patterns in his work, Lady Chatterley's Lover. This study analyses D. H. Lawrence's archetypal images making particular references to his work. The study is confined to the functions and significance of the mythical images and archetypal patterns represented in the aforementioned work. D. H. Lawrence tried to reflect the insecurity and rootlessness of modern life through archetypes; he showed modern man who has become alienated from himself and nature. The method used is archetypal criticism; it deals with archetypes which are primordial images perceived across cultures, inherited from time immemorial, issuing from a 'collective unconscious'. An archetype is a mythic symbol, which is deeply rooted in the unconscious, more broadly based on a foundation of universal nature than an ordinary literary symbol, and is more generally expressive of the elemental in man and nature.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma D. H. Lawrence'm mitolojiyi, sürekli olarak tekrarlanan mitolojik imgeleri ve arketipleri Lady Chatterley'in Sevgilisi adlı eserinde nasıl kullandığını ele almaktadır. Bu çalışma D. H. Lawrence'm arketipsel imgelerini, romana göndermeler yaparak analiz etmektedir. Bu çalışmanın çerçevesi yalnızca D. H. Lawrence'm eserindeki mitolojik arketiplerin önemi ve bu arketiplerin oynadıkları rol ile sınırlıdır. D. H. Lawrence, eserinde modern yaşamın köksüzlüğünü ve güvensizliğini arketipler kullanarak ifade etmeye çalışmıştır. Kendisine ve doğaya yabancılaşan modern insanı mitolojik arketipler kullanarak gözler önüne sermiştir. Kullanılan yöntem arketipsel eleştiri metodudur. Arketipsel eleştiri, yüzyıllarca kültürden kültüre aktarılan ve artık hatırlayamadığımız dönemlere ait ortak bilinçaltımızdan bizlere miras olarak kalan ilk arketipleri ele alan bir eleştiri yöntemidir. Bir arketip, sıradan bir edebi sembolden farklı olarak bilinçaltımızın derinlikelerinde kökleşmiş, evrensel bir kimliği bulunan mitolojik bir semboldür.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-d-h-lawrencein-lady-chatterleyin-sevgilisi-adli-eserinde-arketipleri-kullanimi.pdf
  • 1
47
64
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

BULFINCH, Thomas (1979), Bulfinch's Mythology, Gramercy Books, New York.
GLOVER, Edward (1991), Freud or Jung, Northwestern University Press, Illinois.
GURUDEV, Sujata (2006) The Fiction of D. H. Lawrence, Atlantic Publishers and Distributors Ltd., New Delhi.
HALL, Calvin S. and VERNON J. Nordby (1973), A Primer of
Jungian Psychology, Taplinger Publishing Co., Inc., New York.
HINZ, Evelyn J. and TEUNISSEN, John J. "War, Love and
Industrialism: The Ares/Aphrodite/Hephaestus Complex in Lady Chatterley's Lover" in Jungian Literary Criticism. Edited by Richard Sugg (1992), Northwestern University Press, Illionis.
JUNG, Carl (1953), Two Essays on Analytical Psychology, Pantheon Books, London.
JUNG, Carl (1956), Symbols of Transformation, Princeton University Press, New York.
JUNG, Carl (1959), The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
LAWRENCE, D. H. (1997), Lady Chatterley's Lover, Penguin
Books, London.
LAWSON, Thomas T. (2008), Carl Jung, Darwin of the Mind,
Karnac Books Ltd., London.
MARCUS, Phillip L. (1985) "Lawrence, Yeats, and "the Resurrection of the Body" in D. H. Lawrence A Centenary Consideration Edited by Peter Balbert and Philip L. Marcus, Cornell University Press, London.
MELETINSKY, Elezar. M. (1998), The Poetics of Myth,. Trans. Guy Lavone and Alexander Sacletsky. Garland Publishing Inc., New
York.
THOMSON, George (1967), The Fiction of E. M. Forster, Wayne State University Press, Detroit.
SHAMDASANI, Sonu (2003) Jung and the Making of Modern Psychology The Dream of a Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
SUMMERS, Claude J. (1983), E. M. Forster, Frederick Ungan Publishing Co., New York.
WALKER, Steven F. (2002) Jung and Jungians on Myth: An Introduction, Routledge, New York.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com