You are here

Home » Content

The Application of the Triple Bottom Line Approach to Sustainability Assessment: the Case Study of the UK Automotive Supply Chain

Journal Name:

  • Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management

Publication Year:

  • 2017
DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1996

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The objective of this paper is to assess the level of sustainability of the UK automotive supply chain (SC) considering simultaneously the three dimensions of sustainability (economic, social and environmental) representing the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) approach. Design/methodology/approach: The assessment of the automotive SC’ sustainability is based on the framework proposed by Salvado, Azevedo, Matias and Ferreira (2015) and uses the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method to aggregate economic, environmental and social indicators into a unique index. A case study on the UK automotive industry is used and the data to perform this study is collected from the sustainability reports of the UK’ automotive companies from 1999 to 2014. Findings: The proposed framework represents an important benchmarking tool, offering managers the opportunity for assessing the sustainability behaviour of their supply chains and compare it with other supply chains. Once identified the dimension of sustainability where the supply chain is worst performer managers can work closer to their supply chain’ partners in order to improve the performance of those dimension of sustainability. Research limitations/implications: One limitation of the suggested approach is related to the ambiguity associated to the selection process of the sustainability’ indicators and the definition of weights for each sustainability’ dimension.Practical implications: The assessment of the SC sustainability by using the suggested framework to compute a SC sustainability index offers managers an opportunity for assessing the level of sustainability of each individual company and the corresponding SC in a very easy way. It also represents an opportunity for improving company performance. In this way managers can use the information on the sustainability index to help adjusting their company’s behaviour and improving their economic, social and environmental performance. Originality/value: The proposed framework represents a contribution in the area of index construction and a valuable component of organizational management systems and monitoring programs.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-application-triple-bottom-line-approach-sustainability-assessment-case-study-uk-automotive-supply-chain.pdf
  • 2
286
322
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2013). A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable
supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 329-341.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.018
Arndt, M., & Bigelow, B. (2000). Presenting structural innovation in an institutional environment:
Hospitals’ use of impression management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 494-522.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2667107
Automotive Council UK (2013) - Technology Work Groups, Consensus Roadmaps and workstream feedback.
Available online at: http://www.automotivecouncil.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/D1MPS3-Aut...
Tech-Group-2.pdf (Acessed: 22 may 2016).
Automotive Council UK (2015). UK Automotive International Competitiveness Report 2015: Driving
success – a strategy for growth and sustainability in the UK automotive sector.
Azapagic, A. (2004). Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and
minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(6), 639-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(03)00075-1
Azapagic, A., Stamford, L., Youds, L., & Barteczko-Hibbert, C. (2016) Towards sustainable production
and consumption: A novel DEcision-Support Framework IntegRating Economic, Environmental and
Social Sustainability (DESIRES). Computers and Chemical Engineering, 91, 93-103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.03.017Azevedo, S.G., Govindan, K., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2013). Ecosilient Index to assess the
greenness and resilience of the upstream automotive supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56,
131-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.011
Azevedo, S.G., Govindan, K., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2012). An integrated model to assess
the leanness and agility of the automotive industry. Resources Conservation Recycling, 66, 85-94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.013
Barr, P., Stimpert, J., & Huff, A.S. (1992). Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal.
Strategic Management Journal, 13, 15-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131004
Bautista, S., Enjolras, M., Narvaez, P., Camargo, M., & Morel, L. (2016). Biodiesel-triple bottom line
(TBL): A new hierarchical sustainability assessment framework of principles criteria & indicators
(PC&I) for biodiesel production. Part II-validation. Ecological Indicators, 69, 803-817.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.04.046
Beloff, B.R., & Tanzil, D. (2006). Assessing impacts: overview on sustainability indicators and metrics.
Environmental Quality Management, 15(4), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.20101
Berns, M., Townend, A., Khayat, Z., Balagopal, B., Reeves, M., Hopkins, M., & Kruschwitz, N. (2009).
Sustainability and Competitive Advantage. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(1), 19-26.
Beske, P., & Seuring, S. (2014). Putting sustainability into supply chain management. Supply Chain
Management, 19(3), 331-322. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0432
Camarillo, M., Stringfellow, W.T., Jue, M.B., & Hanlon, J.S. (2012). Economic sustainability of a biomass
energy project located at a dairy in California, USA. Energy Policy, 48, 790.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.020
Chan, A.P.C., Yung, E.H.K., Lam, P.T.I., Tam, C.M., & Cheung, S.O. (2001). Application of Delphi
method in selection of procurement systems for construction. Construction Management & Economics,
19(7), 699-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190110066128
Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., & Puyenbroeck, T.V. (2007). An Introduction to “Benefit of the
Doubt” Composite Indicators. Social Indicators Research, 82(1), 111-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-
9029-7
Christofi, A., Christofi, P., & Seleshi, S. (2012). Corporate sustainability: historical development and
reporting practices, Management Research Review, 35(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211195170Clivillé, V., & Berrah, L. (2012). Overall performance measurement in a supply chain: towards a
supplier-prime manufacturer based model. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23 (6), 2459-2469.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0512-x
Delai, I., & Takahashi, S. (2011). Sustainability measurement system: a reference model proposal. Social
Responsibility Journal, 7(3), 438-471. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111111154563
Dos Santos, S.F. & Brandi, H.S. (2015). Model framework to construct a single aggregate sustainability
indicator: an application to the biodiesel supply chain. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(7),
1963-1973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0919-8
Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women
International, 13, 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006
Erdener, C.B., & Dunn, C.P. (1990). Content analysis. In Huff A.S. (Ed.). Mapping strategic thought.
Chichester: Wiley. 291-300.
Erol, I., Sencer, S., & Sari, R. (2011). A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability
performance of a supply chain. Ecological. Economics, 70(6), 1088-1100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.001
Gasparatos, A., El-Haram, M., & Horner, M. (2008). A critical review of reductionist approaches for
assessing the progress towards sustainability. Environmental Impact Assess Review, 28(4-5), 286-311.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.09.002
Gimenez, C., & Tachizawa, E.M. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: A systematic literature
review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 531-543.
https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258591
Gopal, P.R.C., & Thakkar, J. (2012). A review on supply chain performance measures and metrics:
2000-2011. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(5), 518-547.
https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401211232957
Gray, R.H., Milne, M., & Buhr, N. (2014). Histories, Rationales, Voluntary Standards and Future Prospects
or Sustainability Reporting: CSR, GRI, IIRC and Beyond. In Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer,
B. (Eds.). Sustainability Accounting and Accountability. London: Routledge. 51-71.
GRI (2013). G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines – Reporting Principles and Standard Disclosures,
Global Reporting Initiate. www.gri.org

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com